ppp
Well-Known Member
And yet, they are more moral than their brethren. At least in that respect.To bless same-sex relationships as some German clerics are doing is to deny the teaching by act.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And yet, they are more moral than their brethren. At least in that respect.To bless same-sex relationships as some German clerics are doing is to deny the teaching by act.
Same-sex acts are not of my concern as long as it is consensual with those involved if they're adults. How God may judge them is of His concern.You dance around it but it is obvious you believe same-sex acts to be morally licit. That there are no ends by which human actions must be governed. Either God has changed his mind, or the Church is wrong. Either way, Catholicism is false.
Same-sex acts are not of my concern as long as it is consensual with those involved if they're adults. How God may judge them is of His concern.
Nor do I believe in biblical inerrancy, plus an overview of the Judeo-Christian scriptures makes it abundantly obvious that the cultural norms and folklore of 2000 years ago in eretz Israel permeates much of scripture.
OTOH, the Church has the right and obligation to teach what it believes is morally right, but we as Catholics also have the right of personal discernment. To put it bluntly another way: the Church is not the Gestapo.
Yet, Scripture is clear that sexual sin disqualifies a person from salvation.
Yet, Scripture is clear
I was Christian, I was born and baptized Roman Catholic, Italian-American, made sacraments up to Confirmation. I see Christianity far more clearly from the outside than I did as a Christian, or than many Christians do.
That and many Christians - particularly in the U.S. - presume Jesus to have been a lily white blue-eyed guy. Also, a lot of American Christians embrace a political ideology that's completely antithetical to the teachings and examples of Christ.
It's not my concern either. I don't care what people do in the privacy of their own homes. What I am concerned with is the integrity of Catholic teaching. I don't think the Church can change its teaching on this issue without defecting from the faith. I don't believe doctrine to be a Hegelian dialectic determined by the synthesis of ideas and historical circumstances.Same-sex acts are not of my concern as long as it is consensual with those involved if they're adults. How God may judge them is of His concern.
I do not accept this false dichotomy. A false and contrived dichotomy between Saint Paul and Our Lord. My canon does not start and end with the Gospels.Jesus in His Gospels was not obsessed with sex.
It is. But that won't stop the sophistry claiming otherwise. That the Bible doesn't say what it clearly says.Is it?
You're arguing against a phantom of your own imagining. I never denied the universality of disordered passions; concupiscence, nor have I denied the intrinsic human dignity of those with homosexual inclinations.Consequently, homosexual persons are not the only ones who have disordered inclinations.
I think the essence of basic Catholic teachings is intact, but I also know that there's been some changes on the details that includes some interpretations and/or applications. This is quite logical as the Church would have to make periodic adjustments because of changing conditions, plus revelation is not static but ongoing.It's not my concern either. I don't care what people do in the privacy of their own homes. What I am concerned with is the integrity of Catholic teaching. I don't think the Church can change its teaching on this issue without defecting from the faith. I don't believe doctrine to be a Hegelian dialectic determined by the synthesis of ideas and historical circumstances.