Yet you have an opinion. Other peoples' beliefs don't meet with your own world view, so you deny that it's possible.
Deny what's possible? Any chance of clarifying how or where I've done whatever it is you're rabbiting on about? Or do you just act cantankerously towards atheists on principal?
You're the one insisting that because you're an atheist, self-evident facts, whether I point them out or not, aren't clear.
'Self-evident' is a value judgement. And the way you use the word, so is 'fact'. My point is that your suggesting certainty without evidence and using value laden-language to suggest anyone disagreeing is disagreeing with 'clear and self evident facts'. Which is bunkum. They are disagreeing with your opinion.
You are completely entitled to your opinion. Passing it off as fact is not something you should expect others to stand by and nod at.
Unless you want to have a go at defining 'self-evident' and 'facts' and let me know how the heck they apply to the OP of course.
That's circular logic. Whether it's a judgment of yours, I can't say. Probably.
Yeah, so do you need me to help you with what 'circular logic' means? I'm not the one trying to tell people they need to agree with me.