• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Praying to god for help, does it really make any sense?

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Praying to get something strikes me as absurd for various reasons already mentioned in this thread by others.
.
Praying to give thanks strikes me as unnecessary -- does one really need to pray to feel gratitude? And if one does, isn't the gratitude a tad bit constructed and artificial?

Praying as a form of contemplation strikes me as having potential.
But they are all one in the same. Prayer is in fact a form of meditation. It has to do with accessing your own self though the symbol of the transcendent other. In so doing, you find yourself, your find your own salvation or release from yourself. People are so damned literal they miss the beauty in themselves that the actions of gratitude release from ourselves, to ourselves. Literalism kills symbolism, and thus our own freedom. We live in a symbolic world, and through symbol we liberate ourselves from it.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
But they are all one in the same. Prayer is in fact a form of meditation. It has to do with accessing your own self though the symbol of the transcendent other. In so doing, you find yourself, your find your own salvation or release from yourself. People are so damned literal they miss the beauty in themselves that the actions of gratitude release from ourselves, to ourselves. Literalism kills symbolism, and thus our own freedom. We live in a symbolic world, and through symbol we liberate ourselves from it.

I often find myself in agreement with you, but on this point that is simply not the case. What you say makes little sense to me. In fact, the notion that they are all one and the same puts me in mind of something James Dobson once said about prayer.

He wrote of a vice president of his at Focus on the Family who Dobson praised for his devoutness. As an example of that devoutness, Dobson related that his VP would bring donuts to their Monday morning executive meetings and that he (the VP) would pray for a parking space near the donut shop he frequented. According to Dobson, this showed the man's excellence because he trusted in God not merely to deliver on the "big things", but also on the "little things" as well. But to me the same story illustrates how spiritually superficial and shallow praying to get something is. I simply cannot conceive how the man's prayers were in any appreciable way about finding yourself, or finding your own salvation, or release from yourself.

As for your conflation of prayer and meditation, that is not an equivalence I would easily draw. At the very best, I would call some forms of prayer -- and only some forms -- "contemplative meditation", with a very heavy emphasis on "contemplative" and almost no emphasis on meditation. When I meditate it is the very antithesis of prayer, and while there are other forms of meditation than the sort I engage in, even those other forms seem in many ways fundamentally alien to prayer.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I often find myself in agreement with you, but on this point that is simply not the case. What you say makes little sense to me. In fact, the notion that they are all one and the same puts me in mind of something James Dobson once said about prayer.

He wrote of a vice president of his at Focus on the Family who Dobson praised for his devoutness. As an example of that devoutness, Dobson related that his VP would bring donuts to their Monday morning executive meetings and that he (the VP) would pray for a parking space near the donut shop he frequented. According to Dobson, this showed the man's excellence because he trusted in God not merely to deliver on the "big things", but also on the "little things" as well. But to me the same story illustrates how spiritually superficial and shallow praying to get something is. I simply cannot conceive how the man's prayers were in any appreciable way about finding yourself, or finding your own salvation, or release from yourself.

As for your conflation of prayer and meditation, that is not an equivalence I would easily draw. At the very best, I would call some forms of prayer -- and only some forms -- "contemplative meditation", with a very heavy emphasis on "contemplative" and almost no emphasis on meditation. When I meditate it is the very antithesis of prayer, and while there are other forms of meditation than the sort I engage in, even those other forms seem in many ways fundamentally alien to prayer.

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
I always hope for someone to open a can of worms. Are you ready to go deep diving? :) With you this would be a great pleasure. I trust you know behind what I say there is some considerable thought. It's clear I'll need to flesh this out some. I think you may appreciate it, hopefully.

You touched on a couple forms of prayer in your post. Petitionary prayer, and thanksgiving or gratitude. First, let's look at meditation and those who mediate. Even in meditation you have narcissists such as you described, and genuine seekers who are willing to give everything as the Buddha said you should to seek Enlightenment like one whose hair is on fire seeks a river. The latter is approaching it as a means to overcome the obstacles of the ego. The former is seeking God to help them find one! That's radically different. I'm sure you'd agree.

The narcissists who use various forms of meditation are often referred to as 'Wave jumpers', seeking one peak experience to the next to try to find some sense of self through thrilling experiences of, like of surfer riding one crest of the wave to the next. They are not meditating to discover Truth, they are in search of some sort of meaning they can latch on to. In reality it's a form of avoidance of actual spiritual realization which requires a death to everything you aspire towards.

So to the two types of prayer and the effects they have. With the narcissists who pray or meditate they really are not approaching it the same at all as one who is at the door of overcoming the ego. The narcissist have yet to actually find the ego! That has to come first before you lay it all down at the door of Enlightenment itself. So the way in which the latter approaches prayer and mediation is entirely different. And that type of prayer and mediation is specifically what I am talking about, not those who have yet to have any sense of stable ego to work with who pray for parking spaces and God filling their bank accounts with gold and whatnot. They are not doing the same things.

Why I say prayer is in fact of form of meditation is because in prayer there is a directed intention towards the image of a transcendent Self. The One that lays beyond the ego, that which exists beyond all that we aspire to, hope for, and identify with in the ego-self. "If this is not who I am, than who am I"?, is the true hope to find release from the limits of egoic self-identification. In meditation there are two basic principles which it all hinges on and those are Intention and a lack of expectation, or a specific outcome.

To pray to a deity figure is to focus ones intention "upwards" beyond oneself. That is principle number one. It moves your intention beyond the ego to in the face of the "Holy Other". It is a 2nd person perspective of Spirit, in which there is no place for ego to hide. So you have two things going on in that. One of course is directed focus of intention, which is key to any and all forms of meditation, and the second is seeing your own ego and laying it bare before your own eyes where you then as a result become able to see what you normally inhabit as the "self" as an object of your own awareness, thus transforming the subject of self, into an object of your own awareness. That action in itself leads to self-transformation. It leads to growth. It lead to spiritual development.

In a word, prayer is a form of focused meditation.

Now to thanksgiving. Gratitude is no small thing whatsoever to spiritual growth and development, not to mention a sense of overall general well being! To feel a sense of gratitude is a sense of overflowing love and joy! It connects us with to the world and to ourselves. And through that to all others! In meditation practice there are multiple aspects of it, and not the least of which is grounding. At the end of meditation it is probably the most important part of it to take what was opened to and bring it into your body, into your life, pulling it down, rooting it and grounding it. And when you release that back, it is Love, Joy, and Gratitude.

The simply action of "Thanksgiving" in the simplest prayers are a direction of that "outward" movement of inward joy. To receive and not to give is to make to break the cycle, it's to make the waters stagnant. What you receive is returned. In my way of putting it, the whole a healthy meditation practice can be summarized as an exchange.

I want to quote a couple things that may help explain and reinforce what I attempted to explain here. The first has to do with what I call that "exchange". It's from a 9th century Sufi mystic.

“There are lights which ascend and lights which descend. The ascending lights are the lights of the heart; the descending lights are those of the Throne. The false self is the veil between the Throne and the heart. When this veil is torn, and a door opens in the heart, like springs towards like. Light ascends toward light and light descends upon light, and it is ‘light upon light’.

When each time the heart sighs for the throne the throne sighs for the heart, so they come to meet. Each time a light ascends from you, a light descends toward you. If their energies are equal, then they meet halfway. But when the substance of light has grown in you, then this makes up a whole in relation to what is in the same nature in Heaven. Then, it is the substance of light in Heaven that longs for you, and is drawn to your light, and it descends toward you. This is the secret of the mystical journey.”

9th Century Sufi mystic, Najim al-Din Hubra
This exchange of light and life is what I see as Creation itself. And that lives within us. So any means we find to realize that in ourselves symbolically helps us to realize who and what we truly are.

The 2nd part of this is the idea of prayers of supplication, to "worship" as it were. For this I'll pull out a quote from Ken Wilber I found nailed it on the head.

"But this is not God as an ontological other, set apart from the cosmos, from humans, and from creation at large. Rather, it is God as an archetypal summit of one's own Consciousness. ... By visualizing that identification 'we actually do become the deity. The subject is identified with the object of faith. The worship, the worshiper, and the worshiped, those three are not separate'. At its peak, the soul becomes one, literally one, with the deity-form, with the dhyani-buddha, with (choose whatever term one prefers) God. One dissolves into Deity, as Deity - that Deity which, from the beginning, has been one's own Self or highest Archetype."

~Ken Wilber, Eye to Eye, pg. 85
There's a ton of stuff to penetrate in this, and when people reduce the value of symbolic forms, which I could say considerably more about, to the likes of broken individuals like Pat Robertson and other narcissists, they truly are not beginning to understand the true nature of these things.

I keep promising a book... at what point will I write this? :) I hope this helps clarify some. It's hard to make it concise.

BTW, please don't every say "we agree to disagree" with me. It's seriously my most hated phrase as it's ultimately meaningless. We're far from disagreement here.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
What I've always found peculiar about prayers asking for assistance is that they assume god is either

1) unaware that help is needed, which if true certainly doesn't speak well for his omniscience. So prayer is sort of a wake-up call to god to tend to business. OR. . . . . . .

2) he is aware, but has decided not to help until ask, which to me is kind of petty to say the least. "If you don't ask me nicely, yes, I will let little Johnny die."

Both of which touch on the question of why god supposedly helps some and not others. Got any clue?

So, am I missing something here, or in the end is god simply fickle?

.

I tend to put prayer into 2 buckets, and then not pay it a lot of thought to be honest;

1) It's simplistic thinking. I've seen examples of people who have very literal beliefs around prayer, and to me, at least, these seem to reduce God to some sort of all powerful servant, or someone who needs help prioritizing his actions. That may be what you're referring to in the OP I guess.
2) It's a structured method of mindfulness. A form of keeping God in mind, as well as keeping in mind those around you in need, etc. These examples of prayer are rarely about any sort of personal gain, and certainly not ONLY about personal gain (eg. praying for a sick relative may very well be beneficial to me, but that's not the point of the prayer).

So, as an outsider who doesn't think much about it, that's how I rationalise prayer.
 

Gyrannon

Agnostic Necromancer
Even when I WAS a Christian/Catholic, I never saw the point of prayer.
"God only helps those who helps themselves" thats like a homeless guy asking for a buck & God says "get a job".

Seriously though - God knows everything in advance, he knows what you need & what you deserve before you're even born, and if he's already planned everything out, then those prayers of yours aren't gonna do anything.

You might as well make friends with a Wall & try to get to know it better.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Possibly, but it's a quite a stretch. My premise was about assumptions people would likely make to justify prayers for help, and I don't think they'd do so if they thought god would undermine his plan just because they asked..
I agree that they wouldn't put it that way, but there's a logical disconnect in their thinking somewhere.

If someone agrees that God's plan is perfect as-is, and they agree that they hope their intercessory prayer will change something in a way that they want, then it's hard to say that the person isn't asking God to undermine their plan.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
I agree that they wouldn't put it that way, but there's a logical disconnect in their thinking somewhere.

If someone agrees that God's plan is perfect as-is, and they agree that they hope their intercessory prayer will change something in a way that they want, then it's hard to say that the person isn't asking God to undermine their plan.
His plan?


.
 

james bond

Well-Known Member
seems like a legitimate question to me.....would you like to take a stab at answering it?

I didn't get an answer from Milton Platt (whom I think is a believer), so my question still is why does the OP use the small 'g' to refer to God? If they do not believe in God, then why pray? Isn't that what atheists believe? They dislike people saying our thoughts and prayers for you in times of grief or trouble. So don't pray or else you're not being an atheist. Should you pray to a small 'g,' then your prayers would not be answered so you get the same results by praying or not praying. This is why I question what is the point of the OP?

Now if a believer posted it with a 'G,' it would be different. Then I know they were being sincere. I was taught that one prays to God as others have stated. It's in the Bible. He is the one who grants us our prayers and not anyone else, especially not the small 'g.' What about these prayers on the religious candles and such? I think they're more placebos than anything else, but praying to a saint or angel to communicate with them would be okay. It would mean that you think about them and know about them and what they signify or maybe you think a particular saint is a role model.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
I didn't get an answer from Milton Platt (whom I think is a believer), so my question still is why does the OP use the small 'g' to refer to God? If they do not believe in God, then why pray? Isn't that what atheists believe? They dislike people saying our thoughts and prayers for you in times of grief or trouble. So don't pray or else you're not being an atheist. Should you pray to a small 'g,' then your prayers would not be answered so you get the same results by praying or not praying. This is why I question what is the point of the OP?

Now if a believer posted it with a 'G,' it would be different. Then I know they were being sincere. I was taught that one prays to God as others have stated. It's in the Bible. He is the one who grants us our prayers and not anyone else, especially not the small 'g.' What about these prayers on the religious candles and such? I think they're more placebos than anything else, but praying to a saint or angel to communicate with them would be okay. It would mean that you think about them and know about them and what they signify or maybe you think a particular saint is a role model.

I do not see any statistical deviation between the success rate of praying to someone whose name start with G of g.

Ciao

- viole
 

james bond

Well-Known Member
I do not see any statistical deviation between the success rate of praying to someone whose name start with G of g.

Ciao

- viole

Viole, if you were writing a book like Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion and you used a small g, you would be laughed off the stage. Serious philosophy debates use the big G and are referring to the big G. Some atheists use the small g and I know they're not sophisticated philosophers.

"‘Atheism’ means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God. I shall here assume that the God in question is that of a sophisticated monotheism. The tribal gods of the early inhabitants of Palestine are of little or no philosophical interest. They were essentially finite beings, and the god of one tribe or collection of tribes was regarded as good in that it enabled victory in war against tribes with less powerful gods. Similarly the Greek and Roman gods were more like mythical heroes and heroines than like the omnipotent, omniscient and good God postulated in mediaeval and modern philosophy. As the Romans used the word, ‘atheist’ could be used to refer to theists of another religion, notably the Christians, and so merely to signify disbelief in their own mythical heroes."

Atheism and Agnosticism
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/

>>I do not see any statistical deviation between the success rate of praying to someone whose name start with G of g.<<

What statistical example or source are you using?
 
Last edited:

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
What statistical example or source are you using?

I am not aware of any. And that is the point. I think that this is something neasurable. And if we have not read on any newspaper something like "statistical analysis shows that praying to God is more effective than praying to a can of beer!" then there must be a reason.

And by the way, several, mutually incompatible religions claim answers to prayers and miracles, with the same evidence and conviction. The only rational conclusion we can draw from this is that they annihilate each others, in terms of plausibility.

Ciao

- viole
 

james bond

Well-Known Member
I am not aware of any. And that is the point. I think that this is something neasurable. And if we have not read on any newspaper something like "statistical analysis shows that praying to God is more effective than praying to a can of beer!" then there must be a reason.

And by the way, several, mutually incompatible religions claim answers to prayers and miracles, with the same evidence and conviction. The only rational conclusion we can draw from this is that they annihilate each others, in terms of plausibility.

Ciao

- viole

So you stated your opinion. MARVELous.
 

Jonathan Ainsley Bain

Logical Positivist
So you're saying that this would be something god doesn't know, and something he needs to be convinced of. Doesn't sound like an omniscient god to me at all.

Its not God that requires the convincing, its the person praying that needs to be convinced
(of the meaning of life and death)

but

Herein is the paradox:
If God knows everything, then he does not know what it is like not to know.

So which do you think is a better state? Knowing everything or uncovering mysteries?
Do you enjoy movies that you have seen 10 times, more so than those you have never seen?

Surely a universe with mysteries in it would be more enjoyable for God, than one without mystery?
If he is all-powerful then he can choose to 'not know' in order to know what that feels like.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Its not God that requires the convincing, its the person praying that needs to be convinced
(of the meaning of life and death)
Excuse me! You're the one who said,

"By praying deeply you perhaps may convince God that your need of his spirit is greater than
whatever need is pulling his spirit elsewhere."


.
 

Jonathan Ainsley Bain

Logical Positivist
Excuse me! You're the one who said,
"By praying deeply you perhaps may convince God that your need of his spirit is greater than
whatever need is pulling his spirit elsewhere."
.

Which is why I offer the possibility of God choosing a state of un-knowing in order to know all states.
God gives us free-will. The very concept of our free-will IS paradoxical to God knowing all.
This is not a contradiction because: That God can know all, does not mean that he actually chooses to do so.

A parent can stop a child from eating too much ice-cream, but gives the child the choice of deciding for himself
so that the child can know for himself.

He willfully gives up some of his essence so that we may freely choose to influence the situation.
If he remained all-knowing, we would not have free-will. That he can know all, is not the same as actually knowing all.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Which is why I offer the possibility of God choosing a state of un-knowing in order to know all states.
So, when you say,

"So by contemplating death in the light of prayer one sees beyond one's own ego.
God is logical. So Johnny's spirit is either here or not here. By praying deeply

you perhaps may convince God that your need of his spirit is greater than
whatever need is pulling his spirit elsewhere."

You've assumed that God has actually chosen to be in a state of un-knowing in order to know all states, and needs to bring himself back to a state of knowing. An interesting notion---one needs to make sure God is in his all-knowing state---but highly outside of mainstream Christian theology.


God gives us free-will. The very concept of our free-will IS paradoxical to God knowing all.
Just as an FYI, I don't believe there's such a thing as free will, therefore no need to waste time trying to make any kind of point using it.

This is not a contradiction because: That God can know all, does not mean that he actually chooses to do so.
Sorry but omniscient does not mean "Can know everything," but means "Does know everything."

Omniscient
adjective
1.having complete or unlimited knowledge, awareness, or understanding; perceiving all things.
(Dictionary.com)


Omniscient

  1. having infinite awareness, understanding, and insight
  2. possessed of universal or complete knowledge
    1. (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

om·nis·cient
(ŏm-nĭsh′ənt)
adj.
Having total knowledge; knowing everything: an omniscient deity;
n.
1. One having total knowledge.
(Free Dictionary)



.

 

Jonathan Ainsley Bain

Logical Positivist
Sorry but omniscient does not mean "Can know everything," but means "Does know everything."

But if one does know everything then one does not know what it is like to be in a state of un-knowing.
So in order to know ignorance, it would be a greater state of knowing to choose not to know some things.

Regardless of dictionary definitions of a word I have chosen not to actually use,
it is a Greater God that chooses not to know some things in order to know all things. (Including un-knowing)
 
Top