kejos
Active Member
Unless someone's keen to change the subject.This is a switch for you...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Unless someone's keen to change the subject.This is a switch for you...
Meaning...?Unless someone's keen to change the subject.
Like the love he showed for the millions he purposely drowned in the flood.There are many stories of the bible, places, things, people that can be historically proven by scholars. Yes, some are quite scary to put it bluntly; yet overall, the message God sends through His word is LOVE - LOVE another random stranger as much as we love ourselves, children, etc.
Fundie alert.Like the love he showed for the millions he purposely drowned in the flood.
Calling up the reserves, are you. To the walls, men. To the walls.Fundie alert.
AH, so slavery is ok, but homosexuality is out.
Gotcha.
Ah, so you are free of sin then?
Or is it just this particular sin that one HAS to be completely free from?
You at least seem to be consistent.
You seem to apply your pick and choose logic to all the Bible....
It depends on what is meant by 'believes in'. If it is an intellectual belief that Jesus died for one's sins, it's not enough. The Greek and Hebrew words for 'believe' also mean 'trust'- so one cannot divorce belief from trust when it comes to Christianity, though a major difference grew up in the centuries following Christ, when nominalism led to intellectual faith without personal trust. It also involves love- 'we love because he first loved us,' John wrote, and if the threat of eternal hell is not enough, the love of Jesus through the cross is sufficient. Personal trust and love is what Paul referred to when he wrote that some of the saints had been homosexuals, but were no longer so. There are reformed drunks, druggies, thieves, fornicators, and yes, homosexuals, and some of them are able to give up their practices immediately on conversion. Others need help, but complete change is possible in time, and persons with homosexual desires before conversion can have satisfying heterosexual marriages after conversion. The important thing, and a rather rare thing in the West, is genuine conversion, which involves taking sides with God against oneself- hating one's sins, and loving God in Christ enough to put them into the past.
Say away- to the wall, because others don't see it in those terms- those less-than-impartial terms, perhaps.That first line, you know, I don't know about anyone else, but generally speaking, threats of torture usually don't go together very well with "love". Just saying.
All of them?That second part there, has it occurred to you that perhaps these folks were bi
Let me challenge you with this.
When people sin, they know they are sinning and do it anyways, correct?
Why is it then that most homosexuals do not feel they are sinning? I am speaking of Christian homosexuals here btw. Why will God not make their conscious aware that what they are doing is wrong?
As allegory, in Christianity. Noah and family are the saved; the flood is the last judgement, and the ark is Christ. 'There is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus.'The flood is believed in many religions.
The flood is believed in many religions. Almost all of them have some sort of story about it. I could go on about how much God loves us. One theory on what He did in the flood, was protect genealogy. You see, prior to the flood, angels were coming down to earth and fornicating with women. These women had babies in some instances, possibly. When Noah is described, it is stressed about his pure, clean (using my own words). Perhaps it was because he had no angels in his lineage. His lineage had to be preserved all the way to Jesus. Who knows. I will ask one day when I am with my Father.
It's allegory, as CoE 'priests' realise.How did Noah get around the world to pick up two of each species not native to the Middle East, and how did he have enough room in the ark to house them all.
So what?The flood is believed in many religions. Almost all of them have some sort of story about it.
And he would do this because . . . ? It certainly didn't result in a sinless population following the flood.One theory on what He did in the flood, was protect genealogy.
"possibly," "perhaps." Sorry, but your speculation is meaningless.You see, prior to the flood, angels were coming down to earth and fornicating with women. These women had babies in some instances, possibly. When Noah is described, it is stressed about his pure, clean (using my own words). Perhaps it was because he had no angels in his lineage. His lineage had to be preserved all the way to Jesus. Who knows. I will ask one day when I am with my Father.
So what?
And he would do this because . . . ? It certainly didn't result in a sinless population following the flood.
"possibly," "perhaps." Sorry, but your speculation is meaningless.