Interesting clip. I can sort of see his point, since I'm a bit Taoish, and he's talking about a very Taoist principle - i.e. that ugliness arises when beauty is over-esteemed, etc. (Before anyone has an aneurysm, I'm talking about conceptual opposites in general, not saying some race is beautiful and some other race is ugly.)
From my perspective, this is a fundamental truth. Wealth breeds poverty. Misery breeds happiness. So this guy saying the
idea of "whiteness" creates racial oppression makes sense to me. Part of me is going "Well what about the Irish, and the Poles", but I also see this is missing the point. He's not talking about actual whiteness, or people of European descent. (Let's face it. Nobody is white or black. We are
all varying shades of brown.) He's talking about the
concept of whiteness. In the case of the Irish, that would be the British, since they always depicted the Irish as less white. The Irish were dark, monkey-like creatures in all the British cartoons, so it's pretty clear the Brits thought they were "more white" than the Irish, and that
idea made them feel justified for discriminatory and oppressive policies.
Even still, I'd need to hear him hold forth for a while longer and develop his ideas before I make up my mind whether or not I agree. That clip is obviously just looking for snippets that could make the neo-Nazis hysterical, provided they don't listen too closely and are quick to judge.
Anyway, with respect to Noah's "white heterosexual male history month", I say go for it. I've got no problem with it. I hope you don't mind if I pass on joining in the festivities, though. I don't think I'd like to be within three states of the type of people a thing like that would attract. On top of that, I already celebrated "white heterosexual male history month" for 12 consecutive years at school (Granted, I think we took a day off in about grade 11 to talk about Nellie McClung). I'm still trying to catch up on what has been going on with everybody else since the dawn of time.