Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'll see your looney man child claim and look meaningfully at the incumbent national leader of the only nation on the planet to have ever used nuclear arms in anger. Further, Marvin Jimmyjab is no longer the President of Iran, and even if he were, it's highly arguable as to whether his finger would have ever been "on the button", as it were.Yet they haven't fired in 60 years. I'd worry more about the tantrums of a loony manchild with nukes than this.
Clinton and Obama initiated plenty of military action of questionable legitimacy, legality and efficacy. Let's not play semantics based on the word "invasion".
- Republican R. Reagan, with nothing better to do, went to war in Grenada.
- Republican G. Bush Sr. invaded Iraq (perhaps justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Afghanistan (justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Iraq (totally unjustifiable).
- Republican D. Trump threatened NK:
- "The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea."
Your comment about Democrats "leading the war cry these days" is truly mystifying to me.
- Democrat W. Clinton invaded no Country.
- Democrat B. Obama invaded no Country.
- Republican R. Reagan, with nothing better to do, went to war in Grenada.
- Republican G. Bush Sr. invaded Iraq (perhaps justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Afghanistan (justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Iraq (totally unjustifiable).
- Republican D. Trump threatened NK:
- "The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea."
Your comment about Democrats "leading the war cry these days" is truly mystifying to me.
- Democrat W. Clinton invaded no Country.
- Democrat B. Obama invaded no Country.
You intentionally bolded only that part that suited your argument and completely ignored the operative word which I will now put in RED for you.Oxford English Dictionary defines return as,
“Give, put, or send (something) back to a place or person.”
return | Definition of return in English by Oxford Dictionaries
More insults rather than straight answers? Why? How do you think that helps anyone?Well if you can not tell the difference between what is real and what is not real.
really feel sorry for you.
Um... no. Just about all of this is wrong. But whatever. Clearly you're more interested in insulting people than learning anything contrary to your established world view.In case you miss it ,bill Clinton and Obama did nothing but try to appease other countries and it didn't work, that's why President Trump is having to clean up the mess they left behind.
Democrats are always trying to buy people, in given away in hand outs.
Not like what liberal democrats used to be.
Take for instance liberal democrat President JFK said ( Ask not what your country can do for you, But ask what you can do for your Country)
A big, big, big difference between what democrats once stood for, than what democrats of to day are doing., Nothing but hand outs, and trying to buy off other countries, but as it is, It didn't work and we have North Korea for that proof of evidence.
More insults rather than straight answers? Why? How do you think that helps anyone?
I'm pretty sure I can tell real news from fake, but YOU'RE the one making the claims here, so I'm asking YOU how YOU do it. See the difference? I'm trying to have a polite conversation with you, I'm at a loss as to why you feel the need to insult and obfuscate.
Last time I'll ask, how do YOU determine who's lying and who's telling the truth? Perhaps you'd like to give some specific examples of news networks "lying", and the evidence you used to determine it?What do you mean by insults, there's no insults in saying to check out the Media News Networks. See who's lying and who's telling the truth.
Let's clarify a few things about the "$400 million"... (my emphases)I don't like false dichotomies, but in this case "either give Iran their money back (or something of similar value), OR be prepared to deal with a nuclear armed Iran in the near future" seem the two likely options. If you can think of another option, I'm interested to hear it.
Yes, but let's not run before we can walk here, huh?Let's clarify a few things about the "$400 million"... (my emphases)
5 Things You Need to Know About the $400 Million America Sent to IranBetter yet, read the entire article.
A stronger argument is that the U.S. had to make a big payment to Iran because of a 35-year-old deal for weapons that were never received. It wasn’t a matter of if, but when and how much. Washington was worried that the tribunal would impose a payment of several billion dollars, as Tehran demanded, and grabbed the opportunity to settle for the $1.7 billion as part of a overall pact at the same time Iran was benefiting from the nuclear agreement.
...
Sick concedes that the deal did “let the Iranian hardliners say they got something in the nuclear deal. Iran was happy to get the cash back. Perhaps that made it easier for them to give up the prisoners, I don’t know.” He doesn’t believe the three teams of negotiators were working together. “The negotiations for the hostages were totally separate channels, and handled by the Swiss,” he says.
Clinton and Obama initiated plenty of military action of questionable legitimacy, legality and efficacy. Let's not play semantics based on the word "invasion".
See post #132 above.In case you miss it ,bill Clinton and Obama did nothing but try to appease other countries and it didn't work, that's why President Trump is having to clean up the mess they left behind.
<snip>
Nothing but hand outs, and trying to buy off other countries, but as it is, It didn't work and we have North Korea for that proof of evidence.
Huh?Yes, but let's not run before we can walk here, huh?
Please, give me an example of this real news.You might had you been watching the real news
I already asked his real news sources and he answered.Please, give me an example of this real news.
The news that does not bear false witness like CNN, NBC, CBS.
I definitely consider that, but the problem simply is that even if this is the case he operates out of a double-standard.Perhaps. Do consider Trump is attempting to play to Kim's ego with that video.
Please, give me an example of this real news.
Goal post shifting. But feel free to count Americans that died in Iraq and Afghanistan under Obama if it makes you feel better.How many Americans died as a result of those "military action of questionable legitimacy, legality and efficacy." initiated by Democratic Presidents?
How many Americans died as a result of the "invasions" initiated by Republican Presidents?
Counting dead Americans is not semantics.
- Republican R. Reagan, with nothing better to do, went to war in Grenada.
- Republican G. Bush Sr. invaded Iraq (perhaps justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Afghanistan (justifiably).
- Republican G. Bush Jr. invaded Iraq (totally unjustifiable).
- Republican D. Trump threatened NK:
- "The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea."
Your comment about Democrats "leading the war cry these days" is truly mystifying to me.
- Democrat W. Clinton invaded no Country.
- Democrat B. Obama invaded no Country.