So did lynching black people.Not in reality, but it does have a basis in the law.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So did lynching black people.Not in reality, but it does have a basis in the law.
Does a fetus have volition and self-awareness? Is it capable of making decisions? Does it act on its own? Does it even know it is in a womb?
That is not proof of self-awareness or agency but only that of a nervous system developing. Flatworms react to touch and sound but I don't consider them persons.A baby in mothers womb react to sound touch and it remember this voices when it get born so yes they can think, feel. it does not just happen in the moment it get born that it suddenly start to hear, smell, see and feel.
You're barking up the wrong tree here. I don't believe in such an entity as a soulYou do realize, don't you? ... that volition, self-awareness, making decisions, acting on its own, and even knowing it is in a womb, are irrelevant. Animals have all that and have long been disposable throughout the U.S. The real question is: When does it have a soul?
So when in your view does it become a life?That is not proof of self-awareness or agency but only that of a nervous system developing. Flatworms react to touch and sound but I don't consider them persons.
It's alive but I don't believe it is a person and that is not to say I don't believe that a human fetus isn't human, it is human but not a human person, it is not an individual yetSowhen in your view does it become a life?
I don't believe in such an entity as a soul
So when does it become a individual? and what is the criteria for it to be a life?It's alive but I don't believe it is a person and that is not to say I don't believe that a human fetus isn't human, it is human but not a human person, it is not an individual yet
Pro-Choice really means Pro-deathThere is a tremendous difference in the two meanings. The diffetence is seen after the birth occurs and into childhood. The politicians are getting closer to the Death Penalty for abortion providers and some states have jail time on the books for the woman getting the abortion.
Look closer at how these states allocate funds for those born into poverty. It pretty much says it all.
The Jewish religious leaders in the time of Jesus who behaved the same way as our Republican politicians of today, also clocked their evil behaviour in righteousness.
Why shouldn´t a baby be described as a baby ? Oh, the other sounds so much more clinical and innocuous, got it.
I am pro-women have a right to body autonomyNot a problem for me. Now, are you pro-choice or pro-life?
I never said a fetus isn't alive. It's alive unless it is not. It becomes an individual when it is out of its mother's womb and takes its first breath.So when does it become a individual? and what is the criteria for it to be a life?
So until the baby is out of the mothers womb, there is no individual? even the same baby has been in the mothers womb for 9 months? But there is or is not a lifeform ??I never said a fetus isn't alive. It's alive unless it is not. It becomes an individual when it is out of its mother's womb and takes its first breath.
I never said a fetus isn't a lifeform. How many times do I have to repeat that? And yes when the offspring is out of her mother's womb and she takes her first breath she is an individual.So until the baby is out of the mothers womb, there is no individual? even the same baby has been in the mothers womb for 9 months? But there is or is not a lifeform ??
So until the baby is out of the mothers womb, there is no individual? even the same baby has been in the mothers womb for 9 months? But there is or is not a lifeform ??
Frankly, I can´t find anywhere in the Constitution where this general kill order is found.
I pretty much use the dictionary when it comes to defining terms.
No All form of abortion is in my understanding against the law of dhamma. I do not judge those woman who do chose to take abortion, because they can have their reasons. But as a buddhist i would say it is not a moral rightroues thing to do. But again, i can not say what other should say or mean.Hej
Well, there is a big difference between a one hour old fetus and a nine months old fetus.
Do you agree that aborting a one hour old fetus is less of a problem?
And what about the day after pill, where you do not even know if you are disposing some duplicating human cells or not?
Ciao
- viole
Not in reality, but it does have a basis in the law.