One indirect proof of evolution, that is consistent with science and the bible, is animal and plant breeding. In this case, instead of natural selection setting the potentials for animal or plant selection, we have humans setting the potentials for selection.
In dog breeding, for example, the breeders may start with a litter of puppies. They will pick the ones that best represent the goal of the breeding project. This may be color, markings, temperament, athleticism, and health. Those puppies which best express the goal are then bred, thereby reinforcing these traits in the next generation, etc., until the best of the breed appears one day.
Other breeders of dogs may select differently. They may be looking for a unique spin on a breed, that is off the beaten path; new fur color. Once this secret project is finished, it will look like a missing link appears, as another separate breed of dog. There are now over 150 distinct breeds, all from wolves.
In the Bible, humans bred plants and animals for utility, so they could produce more and better food. The farmer may also save seeds to heirloom varieties. These are kept the same by choice and design; already perfect like Galapagos critters.
Even the Genealogy in the Bible is based on breeding humans true to a specific bloodline, which was the ancient way of saying the same maternal DNA, even before tools could see the DNA. Evolution is not new, except to the atheists. Ancient explorers would see new plants and animals that were restricted to, via selection within foreign lands. They may bring some home, and a missing link appears in their native country. It may be out of place, but it thrives; evasive species with selective advantages.
The most interesting evolutionary angle with the Bible, has to due with religions in general. Many of the world's religions are very old. They also have books that stay the same. They, in general, define moral and rules of behavior, with animal behavior part of animal DNA and selection.
The question is what has been the impact on human behavioral evolution, due to thousands of years of similar willful behavior; morals, and its self serving selection process? This practice and selection for behavior, should eventually become part of the DNA, thereby making a new version of humans.
It may not be coincidental that Christian countries have the most countries represented in the first world. Something is ingrained in their genes; behavioral traits, by natural selection, in the context of two thousand of years of consistent religious beliefs.
If a warrior religion had sustained for thousands of years, and the best of the best were selected each generation, the future of their group DNA would reflect this, making each new generation of humans, innate warriors. But such secular things, do not last long enough, to make this stick for all. Religions are unique to human evolution due to their longevity and selective behavioral consistency. The DNA is slow to change and needs time that only the main religions offer.
The Jews and Chinese are two of the most ancient of cultures. These belief systems have had, perhaps the longest impact on group DNA. This makes it easier to get with the program.
Civilization has not always been part of human evolution. This change is relatively new and offered more in the way of human selection. This changed the trajectory of human evolution, with the old religions of the world offering the longest consistent potential for this new form of selection. The Bible speaks of the first new human; Adam. The natural human, that came before, had a different and more natural selective path with different goals.
