Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
That's easy, I fellowship with God every day and therefore know the truth. You have yet to tell any.
Does this apply to those who enjoy fellowship with other Gods, or only you with yours?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's easy, I fellowship with God every day and therefore know the truth. You have yet to tell any.
Spin doctoring will get you into Hell just as quickly as you could ever desire.
You have a computer connected to the internet and you can't find a dictionary?
No, but you do lack the ability to properly express yourself! If I claim that this, posting of messages, on the internet proves that Engyo exists, I have a serious mental problem. i.e. This exchange between you and I proves that some coward, hiding behind his or her keyboard, calling themselves Engyo exists somewhere in the world. If I hold a close and personal conversation with whoever you really are, then I have firm proof that you are a person.
In the same manor, because there is an active and ongoing conversation with God "I," not you, have complete proof that God is! You can dance around 'til the cows come home, son, but all you're doing is demonstrating your lack of education when you misuse the already over worked expression, circular logic.
Then apparently you don't know anything about modern Biology.I gave you the most comprehensive reference I know of in the second paragraph of the OP. I'm sorry to have to mention it but reading and thought is required!
Even a man like myself that carries a government GED can answer that, and you don't know?Are you even aware of what a scientific theory actually is?[/color]
You make these grand sounding generalized statements that add uyp to excessive use of hot humid air and yet offer nothing?
You're not very good at baiting a trap, are you? I am aware that since I left school there has been a redefining of terms and insertion of others to attempt to confuse and mislead. I am very much aware that you kids have decided to call adaptation Micro-evolution in a stupid and foolish attempt to make, what you now call Macro-evolution look more possible.
Your problem is that for a single cell creature to rise out of that, theoretical, slime pool it must then grow, evolve, into thousands and thousands of highly specialized animals. And for man to have "evolved" from a monkey that evolved from several lessor species involves the complete change of species over several different "major" generational changes. But there is absolutely no evidence available that has stood the tests of time and repeated examination. Every example put forward at this time has fallen victim to the truth,l the same truth that Nebraska Man fell to, the scientists lied!
You need to get busy writing a new text book, that message is not being taught anywhere that I know of.