Yes, it's clear that the Russian government (or certain elements within it) has committed crimes. I would not say that they're "Russia's crimes," although I guess that's just a matter of perception.
Without dodging or handwaving anything, I might question what kind of conclusions we can draw from outlining these specific crimes under discussion. Could it be Russian mafia at work, international organized crime? If that's the case, that would be bad enough, but would it be enough to prove some sort of nationalistic agenda which could threaten global security and the balance of power?
I'd concede that the Russians are no choir boys, but the fact is that they don't see the world as we do in the West. Sure, we can call them a bunch of dirty dogs and impose sanctions on them, which might make our government look good and noble in doing the right thing. But then what? Another Cold War?
I doubt that Russia will do anything too overtly aggressive. They'll play the waiting game and watch US allies as they slowly drop out of the fold. If the US pushes against Russia too hard, then countries on the fence may vacillate. That's what happened in the first Cold War when Britain and France were ready to bail in the 1950s because the US was too harsh and rigid in its policies. They felt the US was acting too unilaterally and not being a team player, and Putin's hope may be that the Western alliance system may eventually implode.
And that may yet happen, especially now, what with all the talk about Trump alienating our allies and so forth. Europe may have to stand against Russia alone (especially if the US government is weakened or paralyzed by political infighting).
There are other wild cards in this, such as India and China. India has been a longtime friend of Russia, and China could go either way at this point. A lot of Westerners seem oblivious to the fact that huge parts of the world are kind of fed up with the sanctimonious West and the prevailing attitude that we know what's best for the rest of the world.