Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LMAO! Oh my, you have to be kidding me. That means that Bilbo Baggins wrote the Hobbit. You really need to think things over when you claim things to be "rubbish". By the way, in those days it appears that people were not so offended when someone else wrote in a person's name, as long as they accurately reflected that person's beliefs. Do you want to discuss the evidence? Right now you are just arguing for Bilbo.
Do you want to give specific examples of "a treatment for an illness that was only possible to develop using scientific knowledge from biological evolution"?
When you ask improper questions no one needs to answer them. There is no "doctrine" of evolution.
I am honestly surprised that you can't realize the stark, almost comic, stupidity of that statement.
... deep breaths ... deep breaths.
Mislabeling or misunderstanding of scientific knowledge regarding evolution as a "doctrine" aside, I think I already covered this adequately in the OP.
You can.
So you don't have any specific examples. Thanks for confirming what I already knew.
Since it is taught in schools as if it were a fact, IT IS A DOCTRINE ... and since those who believe it do not have enough proof to fully demonstrate it, it is evident that they have been INDOCTRINATED.
No, it is demonstrably a fact. You probably have this mistaken concept because you have been indoctrinated yourself. There are religious doctrines. Some of them demonstrably wrong. And yet because the believers were indoctrinated as children and due to threats of endless torture and threats from their own church they will continue to beleive.Since it is taught in schools as if it were a fact, IT IS A DOCTRINE ... and since those who believe it do not have enough proof to fully demonstrate it, it is evident that they have been INDOCTRINATED.
If you don't like, you can delete my post as you've done before. But you cannot erase the truth that has been told.
I'm so sorry. I looked and looked, but could find nothing that was limited to a single paragraph of single syllable words. And, having nothing akin to holy writ at my disposal, I simply failed to find text capable of dispelling willful ignorance.
That was what I asked. Was it too much?
You made an improper challenge. No illness has only one treatment. What he showed is that the best treatment of some diseases rely upon evolution.That was what I asked. Was it too much?
It seems that the one who said there were some illnesses which treatment "was only possible to develop using scientific knowledge from biological evolution" exagerated or purposedly lied about this.
Apparently the doctrine of evolution is not as useful as some would have us believe.
What is taught in schools in science courses are discoveries and observations, such as the fossil record; this is something that is not only told, it is something that can be shown. These discoveries and observations get presented as evidence. It's why we have things like field trips and museums. It's why we have documentation of those discoveries and observations.Since it is taught in schools as if it were a fact, IT IS A DOCTRINE ... and since those who believe it do not have enough proof to fully demonstrate it, it is evident that they have been INDOCTRINATED.
I don't know what this is about. Perhaps you have me confused with someone else, or this is purely an intentional attempt at defamation of my character.
Personal ego-integrity often takes precedence over personal safety or well-being.
simple people who dont now how to do basic research come up with statements like yours above...
| John Greets the Seven Churches 4John, To the seven churches in the province of Asia:b John’s Vision on Patmos 9I, John, your brother and partner in the tribulation and kingdom and perseverance that are in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and my testimony about Jesus. |
Stupid is as stupid does...you follow in the footsteps of those who dont know the basic principles of collating evidence.
Absolutely! The Gospel of James is one of my particular favorites.
Oh my. Such poor poor reasoning. Once again, just because a book says that it was written by someone does not necessarily mean that it was written by someone. Let's take Paul. He was a historical figure, he was well educated. He had the ability to write, so when quite a bit of work with his name attached to it claims to have been written by him and was well accepted by others, then yes we can reasonable accept that it was written by him. But not even all of "Paul's letters" are thought to be by Paul. If someone wrote in my place or someone wrote in your place using our names it would be obvious after a while that it was not us. The same happened to some of the writings of Paul. The differences in writing style is too great. There are at least 6 of "Paul's letters" that scholars of the Bible are very sure were not written by Paul:
www.mdpi.com
I learned certain things in school about evolution that were eventually changed. They weren't taught as possibilities in school, but as facts. And as students, no one expressed the thought that these things can change. Neither did the teachers I studied with.Since it is taught in schools as if it were a fact, IT IS A DOCTRINE ... and since those who believe it do not have enough proof to fully demonstrate it, it is evident that they have been INDOCTRINATED.
If you don't like, you can delete my post as you've done before. But you cannot erase the truth that has been told.
