Besides the word God being a title so is the word Lord a title and Not a personal name. No kidding.You have got to be kidding me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Besides the word God being a title so is the word Lord a title and Not a personal name. No kidding.You have got to be kidding me.
If you were a small town employee and a corrupt employee caused the small town's business (which was the source of income for the people) to go bankrupt and No one was buying the company the people would Not only be loosing their job but could not now pay for bills or food.
A benevolvent benefactor read about the people's plight and decided to buy the company and care for the people.
God is our Benevolent Benefactor because Satan and Adam bankrupted us from everlasting life.
Because we can't stop sinning we die, so we needed someone who could resurrect us. Jesus can and will.
God bought out Satan's ' business of sin ' for us by sending heavenly pre-human sinless Jesus to Earth for us.
By sinless Jesus' dying a faithful death our sins can be blotted out - 1 John 1:7
In the Bible, God is Not only our Benevolent Benefactor but also Creator and heavenly Father.
( Father means: Life Giver and Not life taker - Revelation 4:11 - everlasting life from the God of the Bible )
If God thinks of himself as benevolent, it would not be either a mere opinion of his or a fact. It would be reality.Sure, but that is not what I am asking though.
That was an illustrative question to understand how you see morality.
Take it as a given that God exists. If God thinks of himself as benevolent, would that be a mere opinion of his or a fact? Could his own understanding of morality be something other than a personal opinion?
I guess you missed the point I was making in my previous post.Then the goal is also the journey itself.
If the goal was merely the end point, then omnipotence would be incompatible with it.
Using the cake analogy: An omnipotent entity may want to go through all the steps to bake a cake, and that is entirely compatible with omnipotence. The distinction though is that every step is willed rather than being done out of necessity. I wonder why you would see this as benevolent by the way.
Maybe spiritual qualities can be by some people without suffering but others need suffering to attain.If there is no logical constraint, there is no reason as to why spiritual qualities can't be attained without suffering.
So how do you decide when it's actually a reference to God?Besides the word God being a title so is the word Lord a title and Not a personal name. No kidding.
If God thinks of himself as benevolent, it would not be either a mere opinion of his or a fact. It would be reality.
I guess you missed the point I was making in my previous post.
God is not going through any steps, humans are going through the steps, and since humans are NOT omnipotent it is necessary for humans to go through all the steps in order to get to the end point. The steps are taken out of necessity because it is necessary for humans to go through the steps in order to get to the end point. God is not willing anything for us but rather God has given humans free will to complete our own journey.
Maybe spiritual qualities can be by some people without suffering but others need suffering to attain.
The world was created as it is for everyone with the idea that some people need suffering to attain so that is why there is suffering in the world.
Hope for better things to come and faith in God helps to sustain our lives. Psalm 37 is encouraging.You said you had emotional pain that caused you to consider taking your own life on several occasions. That is the definition of "mental health issues". With all due respect, accepting you have a problem is the first step in addressing the problem.
Religion will not address the cause of the problem. Like medication, it just addresses the symptoms. Counselling, therapy, etc are the only way to address the source. The fact that you say the issue is long-term and ongoing suggests that the Band Aid of religion keeps coming off.
Questions that believers cannot answer…. without resorting to a plethora of religious apologetics.
If God is loving, why did God ‘intentionally’ create a world that He knew would engender so much human and animal suffering?
If God is just, why did God create a world in which He knew some people would suffer so much more than others, many people hardly suffering at all? How is that fair?
I am not referring to suffering caused by our own choices we make that cause us to suffer, I am talking about suffering as the result of fate and predestination.
To clarify, I believe that some things that happen to us are subject to human free will and some things are not, because they were predestined by God and we have no control over them. That is called fate.
All things that are not chosen by virtue of our own free are beyond our control and I believe they are predestined by God. God is responsible for both the good and the bad things that happen to us, if those things were predestined.
“Some things are subject to the free will of man, such as justice, equity, tyranny and injustice, in other words, good and evil actions; it is evident and clear that these actions are, for the most part, left to the will of man. But there are certain things to which man is forced and compelled, such as sleep, death, sickness, decline of power, injuries and misfortunes; these are not subject to the will of man, and he is not responsible for them, for he is compelled to endure them. But in the choice of good and bad actions he is free, and he commits them according to his own will.”
Some Answered Questions, p. 248
Man is compelled to endure the bad things that happen because God set it up that way since we live in a material world where some of the Bad things happen are beyond our control. Some of these Bad things are caused by the free will decisions of other people that affect us and some of them are simply accidents, misfortunes and diseases. These are our fate, for which God is responsible.
Believers only want to look at the good things and thank God for those things, they do not want to look at the bad things for which God is responsible. Instead, they try to say that all the bad things are really good because suffering is good, and God can never be responsible for anything bad. This is a religious apologetic and Imo it is an attempt to gloss over all the suffering in the world and say God is not responsible for it.
It would be unfair to blame man for things that are beyond his control so who is responsible for all the suffering in the world that is not caused by man? Logically speaking, if God is responsible for 'everything' then God is responsible for 'both' the good and bad things that happen to us.
Isaiah 45:7 ESV
I form light and create darkness; I make well-being and create calamity; I am the Lord, who does all these things.
I rest my case.
A fact is something that can be proven whereas reality is what exists whether or not it can be proven to exist.What distinction are you drawing between 'fact' and 'reality'?
Why would it be reality rather than a fact or an opinion?
Just because God is omnipotent and can control everything that does not mean that God chooses to control everything. God allows humans free will and does not override that free will, so everything that happens is not what God wants, not unless it was predestined by God.Every actualized state of affairs must be God's will if we are talking about an omnipotent god. Assume that God has some sort of goal that he doesn't actualize instantly, but rather by going through many other actualized states of affairs: that is what I am calling 'steps'. And what I am saying is that every single 'step' (or allows to happen) God takes must necessarily be a goal in itself, since it would be pointless to actualize something contrary to what God wants. Therefore, every single time someone suffers, that is exactly what God wants to happen at that time.
It does not feel just to me. Didn't you see what I said in the OP?How is this just?
A fact is something that can be proven whereas reality is what exists whether or not it can be proven to exist.
An opinion is a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
Fact: something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information: fact
Opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=opinion+meaning
Reality:
1. the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.
2. the state or quality of having existence or substance.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=reality+means
Just because God is omnipotent and can control everything that does not mean that God chooses to control everything. God allows humans free will and does not override that free will, so everything that happens is not what God wants, not unless it was predestined by God.
I made that clear in my OP.
Questions that believers cannot answer
It does not feel just to me. Didn't you see what I said in the OP?
If God is just, why did God create a world in which He knew some people would suffer so much more than others, many people hardly suffering at all? How is that fair?
What is unjust is that some people suffer so much more than others for no apparent reason, not that people who don't need to suffer to grow spiritually also have to suffer, simply because God created this world to be a storehouse of suffering.
God could get what He wants because there is nothing preventing God from getting what He wants, but that does not mean that everything that happens in this world is what God wants. God can allow things to happen that He does not want to happen....Even if God chooses not to control everything he is getting exactly what he wants, all the time. Even when he does nothing. God can not want something and it not being actualized. That would contradict his omnipotence and omniscience since he has both the will to actualize a state of affairs and the power to do it, therefore nothing preventing him from getting what he wants.
I don't think so, but if it is for the sake of spiritual growth, that is not for no reason.They are both cases of being unjust.
Is it just to allow anyone to experience suffering for no reason?
Maybe spiritual qualities can be by some people without suffering but others need suffering to attain.
The world was created as it is for everyone with the idea that some people need suffering to attain so that is why there is suffering in the world.
God could get what He wants because there is nothing preventing God from getting what He wants, but that does not mean that everything that happens in this world is what God wants. God can allow things to happen that He does not want to happen....
I don't think so, but if it is for the sake of spiritual growth, that is not for no reason.
No, I do not believe that everyone will gain exaltation from suffering. That is a religious apolegetic.Do you believe everyone will gain the same exaltation? If suffering does not lead to exaltation, then no - suffering does not help.
I FULLY understand, but I still believe that God exists and is all-powerful, so I fear God even though I cannot love a God that created a world with so much suffering.I left God- hate the idea of God- because of suffering .
Beat someone up - don't expect them to love you for it. Abuse does not refine anyone, it gives you ptsd, many go insane- most homeless are there from mental illness from abuse as an example. Kicking and abusing people does not make them more loving.
I'll say it again - I hate the idea of God.
I have to agree. I cannot understand how anyone can love God and have compassion for humans at the same time.Little innocent kids, all the horror - and you think - they needed to be abused?? That abusing kids is good for them? You are ****ed up, you are as bad as the abusers. Sick.
Because God wants people to choose, but what they choose is not necessarily what God wants them to choose.Why would God allow something he doesn't want?
Why would he allow something contrary to his will?
True.Sure, but only if strictly necessary for such growth.
The context was lost... I meant Creator making a world without moral evil would be a world without free will.So if a person prevents a moral evil, free will doesn't exist?
No. If you have free choice for a good act then there is at least one evil alternative - refraining from a good act.No you don't. If I have a free choice between five different good acts, then I have free will.
By your argument, every imaginable action must be available to us at all times or we don't have free will. Which is obvious nonsense.
If you forcibly prevent someone doing evil then one is just a puppet not doing good by himself.How does the non existence of evil mean there can be no good?
Not really. A rational argument will stand up to independent scrutiny. It does not rely on opinion.As I read it, rational is a matter of opinion.
This is truly bizarre.Apparently you defined it yourself... well done.
With all due respect, it appears that you don't know what "wiser" means either.I have, and I am the wiser.
Have you though? Or did you read it simply to confirm your existing belief? Do you believe there is a real possibility that the whole god and Jesus thing is nothing more than ancient myth and superstition?Yes, although still have much to learn.
How? That's like saying that if you removed all the desserts, you wouldn't be able to choose a main from the menu.I agree with you. We would be puppets on a string.