And what was his name and address?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
I am still waiting . . .
Hydrothermal vents over 3.7 billion years ago near the spreading zone of the early continental drift.
https://www.science.org/content/art...-fossils-stake-new-claim-oldest-evidence-life: Hematite filament fossils
Last edited:
They're not going to coincide with any definition when they're wrong. Rabbits don't chew their cud. No amount of apologetics can change that. It would be much more dignified to admit the error but instead you choose deception.
I escaped and am back home in the AC. I'm much better evolved for that.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
How many friends did it have?
what was its favorite color?
how old was its spouse?
did it know its mothers maiden name?
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Really need a cricket frubal....
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I am glad to see others fighting fire with fire. Or should I say lunacy with lunacy?
McBell
Admiral Obvious
If he does not answer with the official answers ALL of them then evolution is proven wrong and therefore by default GodDidIt!!!!!!!!!!!
and you know it is true cause of all the exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@SavedByTheLord already declared he would accept any scientific answer to any of his questions. like AIG.
Last edited:
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
Would you mind telling me what your academic and professional credentials are?
Asking about a person's academic and professional credentials appears to be an important question to ask since it's been asked more than once.
I think you failed to pick the sarcasm of his posts.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Nope, not at all.
Except the one who asks it the most has not revealed theirs even after being flat out asked to numerous times in numerous threads.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
The carrying of sin and death is the outcome of Adam and Eve's sin. That's the penalty we face as children of Adam and Eve. It's not personal but can be devastating. Just as Jesus healed many, so those with faith in the future will also be healed.
That story has no basis in fact. There’s no reason to assume it’s true or relevant to anyone. This is a fatal problem for those who believe the Jesus story since sin is not a credible phenomenon.
Why believe in these ideas? They are implausible.
What a sad way of looking at life. We're all punished from something our ancestors did many generations ago.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
One would think that Christians would be happy when they learned that a large number, if not all, of the evil deeds that the Bible claims that their God did never happened.
People are weird sometimes.
McBell
Admiral Obvious
Ezekiel 18:20
The person who sins will die. A son will not be punished for his father’s sins, and a father will not be punished for his son’s sins. The righteousness of the righteous person will be his own, and the wickedness of the wicked person will be his own.
Original sin seems like a cop out to me, that and free will cover everything that can't be explained. Fortunately it only seems to be a minority of Christians who resort to such tactics. Most of my family and friends are Christians and I don't recall any of them ever saying it.