How many “kinds” were on the Ark? Explain how this number resulted in 8.7 million species in 4500 years. Show us the work.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That is a claim. It is not a definition. What makes dogs dogs? What makes people people?
I do remember you claiming to be a giraffe or something like that in one of your posts. You did actually deny that you are a human being.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Read the Bible. Do cats and dogs produce offspring?
It is real science not fake science,
A man only fathers a child through a woman and no other kind.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Sorry, but the Bible is a religious book. It is not a science book.
Real science follows the scientific method. Show how evolution does not do that.
When you run away you admit that you are wrong. And everyone can see it.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Evolution is against the scientific method,
And for origins, the Bible is the very word of God, who created all things.
Evolutionists just have already proven false assumptions and get everything wrong based on those.
I already proved that God Almighty created all things about 6000 years ago in 6 days and the Bible is the true word of God,
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Again, you have to prove it. If you only claim it and do nothing then you are admitting that you are wrong. I do not think that you even understand the scientific method.
No, with all of its errors in it the Bible is clearly the work of man. You would need to prove this too, but we know that you can't. We know that you never did. You keep forgetting that you admitted that you were wrong in those debates by running away.
Once again, you need to name those assumptions and prove that they are false. If you do not even try you lose be default.
No, you never did. That is clearly not true. You ran away from the discussion on your flaws in your inductive proof. In other words, you admitted that you were wrong.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I dd and you waving your hands does not make it go away.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Where did I do any handwaving? This appears to be another false claim that you need to justify. You may not even understand the phrase. You are must mimicking it as you tried to mimic logical fallacies in the past.
I have and will support my claims that need support. You one the other hand never do so properly.
Esteban X
Active Member
This seems to be some novel and unique use of the term 'proved'
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
How did the citrus cycle evolve?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The citrus cycle? LOL!! Oh that began in Florida. They had a regular bicycle and they cleaned it with lemon.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Why is it a bad answer? If you cannot explain why then you just refuted yourself again.
I already told you. If you do not understand you should be asking questions. Unlike you I do not run away from legitimate questions.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You answer was nonsense/
How did the citrus cycle evolve?
Can you at least show what steps, what proteins and catalysts are involved in each steps, and what genes are involved in each step and show how each of these evolved
McBell
Unbound
That is rather rude.
Calling an answer nonsense simply because you can not understand it..
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, it is very correct. Have you ever considered that you my have made a very humorous mistake? I am only answering your questions. If the answers seem to be nonsense to you it is your fault. not mine.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
See @SavedByTheLord , he got it.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No answer from the official mouth of the evolutionists and billions of years crowd.
There are many reports of miraculous cures, especially from bad medical conditions. How do you explain them all?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Answers for what? You do not know how to ask proper questions. In fact technically until you deal with the serious answers given to you you have lost and no one needs to answer any of your questions.
Easy, anecdotes are not evidence. Too bad that you refuse to understand the concept of evidence. Without evidence all that you have are unrelated stories.
Acceptance
This view is generally accepted by major Christian churches, including the Catholic Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Episcopal Church (United States), and some other mainline Protestant denominations; virtually all Jewish denominations; and other religious groups that lack a literalist stance concerningWith this approach toward evolution, scriptural creation stories are typically interpreted as being allegorical in nature. Both Jews and Christians had considered the idea of the Genesis creation history as an allegory (rather than as an historical description) long before the development of Darwin's theory.