• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Wow. Your post is a great example of circular reasoning.
Click to expand...

How so? An inability to support a claim that needs support is evidence that it is wrong. That is not circular reasoning. You simply do not understand that concept at all.
SavedByTheLord said:
How many amino acids did the first living creature have?
Click to expand...
Oh no, you have to own up to your errors first. Did you forget already? How old are you? You appear to be very very forgetful. You might want to talk to a medical specialist.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
How so? An inability to support a claim that needs support is evidence that it is wrong. That is not circular reasoning. You simply do not understand that concept at all.

Oh no, you have to own up to your errors first. Did you forget already? How old are you? You appear to be very very forgetful. You might want to talk to a medical specialist.
Click to expand...
Because you are using debate 101 techniques to avoid a simple discussion where I will ask you questions and you should be able to provide real rationale answers.

All reasoning for evolution and billions of years is circular reasoning and not science.
This is it in a nutshell.
We know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and since we know evolution and billions of years are true (conclusion is the assumption) and such and such exists, it must have evolved because we know evolution and billions of years are true (restating the assumption as the conclusion).
Furthermore, any evidence that contradicts evolution and billions of years must be false because we know evolution and billions of years are true.
Furthermore, they have no real rational answer to the origin of anything. But they know it must have happened because it must have happened by evolution because they know that evolution and billions of years are true. And they are absolutely sure that the answers will one day be found because they know that evolution and billions of years are true.
Some will even use all debate 101 techniques to keep from answering the questions because they have no real rational answer to the origin of anything.

what was the first living thing and what features did it have?
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Because you are using debate 101 techniques to avoid a simple discussion where I will ask you questions and you should be able to provide real rationale answers.
Click to expand...

Where be specific? I have pointed out verry clearly how you are guilty of that sin.
Oh noes! For some reason the nonsense that you keep repeating did not come through . I guess even my computer has had it with your ignorant nonsense and false claims.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Subduction Zone said:
Where be specific? I have pointed out verry clearly how you are guilty of that sin.

Oh noes! For some reason the nonsense that you keep repeating did not come through . I guess even my computer has had it with your ignorant nonsense and false claims.
Click to expand...
Stop the false accusations if you can.

Where and when did the first living creature come into beinG?
 
ratiocinator

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
SavedByTheLord said:
Stop the false accusations if you can.
Click to expand...
irony.gif

Matthew 7:5
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord said:
Stop the false accusations if you can.

Where and when did the first living creature come into beinG?
Click to expand...
Oh my! There were not any accusations false or not.

By the way, new rule for you. Any time you use the phrase "false accusations" and do not support it in that post that will be seen as an admission that you got caught saying something ignorant and wrong.
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
SavedByTheLord said:
It is the very calculation. So you do Not understand probability and statistics.
What was the first living thing and how many amino acids did it have ?
Click to expand...

You have not shown your calculation .. despite being asked numerous times so perhaps it is you who "do not understand probability and statistics" - I happen to be a scientist - Chemist - Microbiology - with a stellar understanding of probability and statistics.

You were asked to provide the calculation .. .. thats what us scientists and mathematicians do .. to show that a claim is true. Picking random numbers out of the air .. and asking me questions that you are supposed to know the answer to in order to do the calculation ... is not proof of claim Brother SBTL

and last -- state your assumptions .. such as how many amino acids the first living thing had .. rather than asking the crowd to help you figure out the calculation you claim to already know.
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Sargonski said:
You have not shown your calculation .. despite being asked numerous times so perhaps it is you who "do not understand probability and statistics" - I happen to be a scientist - Chemist - Microbiology - with a stellar understanding of probability and statistics.

You were asked to provide the calculation .. .. thats what us scientists and mathematicians do .. to show that a claim is true. Picking random numbers out of the air .. and asking me questions that you are supposed to know the answer to in order to do the calculation ... is not proof of claim Brother SBTL

and last -- state your assumptions .. such as how many amino acids the first living thing had .. rather than asking the crowd to help you figure out the calculation you claim to already know.
Click to expand...
I have of course.

And your circular reasoning indoctrination is very very strong in you.

What caused the Big Bang and where did the finely tuned orderly laws of nature come from.
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
SavedByTheLord said:
I have of course.

And your circular reasoning indoctrination is very very strong in you.

What caused the Big Bang and where did the finely tuned orderly laws of nature come from.
Click to expand...

Asking you to show your calcultion is not "circular reasoning indoctrination" friend. It is you failing to support your claim .. and thus put forth a valid argument.

Why are you asking me the assumptions you are supposed to provide for your calculation of the probability humans existing. How would I know what assumptions you made .. without you providing the calculation. Asking silly questions and name calling will not help resurrect crucified position friend.. ?!
 
SavedByTheLord

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Sargonski said:
Asking you to show your calcultion is not "circular reasoning indoctrination" friend. It is you failing to support your claim .. and thus put forth a valid argument.

Why are you asking me the assumptions you are supposed to provide for your calculation of the probability humans existing. How would I know what assumptions you made .. without you providing the calculation. Asking silly questions is not help resurrect crucified position.
Click to expand...
What pray tell was wrong with my calculation?
Dismissing it without actually addressing it is circular reasoning because you dismissed it since its refutes evolution and billons of years.

What was the first living creature?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top