Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

[Subduction Zone]

No logic or science in your post.

You do not know what either is. I have offered to go over both with you but you do exactly what a person guilty of not knowing and being afraid would do, you run away.

Why are you so afraid? If you are not then it would be very easy to prove me wrong. Let's have a discussion about evidence, science, and logic until it is clear that you do understand those topics.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You do not know what either is. I have offered to go over both with you but you do exactly what a person guilty of not knowing and being afraid would do, you run away.

Why are you so afraid? If you are not then it would be very easy to prove me wrong. Let's have a discussion about evidence, science, and logic until it is clear that you do understand those topics.

Why not refute the 5 proofs I have given.
More are coming.

The Bible predicted these with exact timing in the last days.
When are you predicting that you guys will have the answer to the origin of anything?

Explosion of knowledge in the last days. – Dan 12:4

Explosion in worldwide travel in the last days. – Daniel 12:4

Population explosion in the last days to the levels of today. – Rev 9:6

The technology to implement the mark of the beast available in the last days. – Rev 14-16

The technology to implement worldwide surveillance available in the last days. – Rev 14-16

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why not refute the 5 proofs I have given.
More are coming.

You did not give any proofs so how can I refute them? If you copied and pasted your bad arguments those could be easily refued.

The Bible predicted these with exact timing in the last days.
When are you predicting that you guys will have the answer to the origin of anything?

Explosion of knowledge in the last days. – Dan 12:4

Sorry it does not predict that:

"4 But you, Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end. Many will go here and there to increase knowledge.”

There is nothing there about an "explosion of knowledge" it is not even about the future. We need to go over the rules for a valid prophecy. That is not even a prophecy.

Explosion in worldwide travel in the last days. – Daniel 12:4

That verse does not say or imply that either. You are still wrong.

Population explosion in the last days to the levels of today. – Rev 9:6

Nope, that does not predict that either. You should not take your verses out of context. You misunderstand their meaning when you do that.

The technology to implement the mark of the beast available in the last days. – Rev 14-16

Nope:

So he who was seated on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the earth was harvested.

Here is something you should never do. You should never quote mine the Bible. I can do the same. There are at least 20 different places that the Bible says "There is no God". By quoting just that part does that prove that there is no God? By your standards it seems that it does.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You did not give any proofs so how can I refute them? If you copied and pasted your bad arguments those could be easily refued.

Sorry it does not predict that:

"4 But you, Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end. Many will go here and there to increase knowledge.”

There is nothing there about an "explosion of knowledge" it is not even about the future. We need to go over the rules for a valid prophecy. That is not even a prophecy.


That verse does not say or imply that either. You are still wrong.


Nope, that does not predict that either. You should not take your verses out of context. You misunderstand their meaning when you do that.


Nope:

So he who was seated on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the earth was harvested.

Here is something you should never do. You should never quote mine the Bible. I can do the same. There are at least 20 different places that the Bible says "There is no God". By quoting just that part does that prove that there is no God? By your standards it seems that it does.

And you are a prediction from the word of God come true with exact timing and detail.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And you are a prediction from the word of God come true with exact timing and detail.

Really? Then why can't you find any such predictions? There have been crazies claiming that Jesus would be back soon even shortly after he died. They have all been wrong. And they at least understood the Bible.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Really? Then why can't you find any such predictions? There have been crazies claiming that Jesus would be back soon even shortly after he died. They have all been wrong. And they at least understood the Bible.

They were misinformed and did not understand scripture.
The Bible predicted the Inquisitions and the Black Death

 

[John53]

They were misinformed and did not understand scripture.
The Bible predicted the Inquisitions and the Black Death

Provide the evidence instead of making claims.

 

[Subduction Zone]

They were misinformed and did not understand scripture.
The Bible predicted the Inquisitions and the Black Death

That sounds like you too. You repeatedly demonstrate that you re misinformed and it is rather clear that you mot understand scripture either.

And no the Bible did not predict either of those. Before you post some nonsense here are some basic rules that any religion has to follow, though this list is specifically for Christians:

Criteria for a true prophecy[edit]​

For a statement to be Biblical foreknowledge, it must fit all of the five following criteria:

1. It must be accurate. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not accurate, because knowledge (and thus foreknowledge) excludes inaccurate statements. TLDR: It's true.
2. It must be in the Bible. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it is not in the Bible, because Biblical by definition foreknowledge can only come from the Bible itself, rather than modern reinterpretations of the text. TLDR: It's in plain words in the Bible.
3. It must be precise and unambiguous. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if meaningless philosophical musings or multiple possible ideas could fulfill the foreknowledge, because ambiguity prevents one from knowing whether the foreknowledge was intentional rather than accidental. TLDR: Vague "predictions" don't count.
4. It must be improbable. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of a pure guess, because foreknowledge requires a person to actually know something true, while a correct guess doesn't mean that the guesser knows anything. This also excludes contemporary beliefs that happened be true but were believed to be true without solid evidence. TLDR: Lucky guesses don't count.
5. It must have been unknown. A statement cannot be Biblical foreknowledge if it reasonably could be the result of an educated guess based off contemporary knowledge, because foreknowledge requires a person to know a statement when it would have been impossible, outside of supernatural power, for that person to know it. TLDR: Ideas of the time don't count.

 

[McBell]

No logic or science in your post.

There was more than enough truth and facts for the need of logic of science to be a requirement.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

There was more than enough truth and facts for the need of logic of science to be a requirement.

But you no truth or facts.
what was the first living creature?

 

[McBell]

But you no truth or facts.
what was the first living creature?

Seems I need to add a few more words to that list....

 

[Subduction Zone]

But you no truth or facts.
what was the first living creature?

Your questions refute your claims. Do you want to learn how!

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Your questions refute your claims. Do you want to learn how!

So no answer to a fundamental question.
Evolution is just circular reasoning and the theory of nothing because it answers nothing about the origin of anything.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So no answer to a fundamental question.
Evolution is just circular reasoning and the theory of nothing because it answers nothing about the origin of anything.

Thank you for admitting that you are wrong.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What is your academic and professional credentials if I may ask?

What are your academic and professional credentials?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

So no answer to a fundamental question.

Who asked a fundamental question?

Evolution is just circular reasoning

Show us. Explain it. Where is the circular reasoning?

and the theory of nothing because it answers nothing about the origin of anything.

It isn't a theory about the origin of life. Good grief!

You have what is known as a straw man here. I don't think you created it intentionally. I don't think you understand the science at all and are so confused about it so deeply that you don't understand what you are claiming.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Actually I understand it very well better than blinded evolutionists.

No you don't. The evidence of these threads you made demonstrate that without any doubts.

That is why I have refuted it using its weak links which is almost everything.

You haven't refuted anything.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Why not refute the 5 proofs I have given.
More are coming.

The Bible predicted these with exact timing in the last days.
When are you predicting that you guys will have the answer to the origin of anything?

Explosion of knowledge in the last days. – Dan 12:4

Explosion in worldwide travel in the last days. – Daniel 12:4

Population explosion in the last days to the levels of today. – Rev 9:6

The technology to implement the mark of the beast available in the last days. – Rev 14-16

The technology to implement worldwide surveillance available in the last days. – Rev 14-16

Where are these proofs?

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Where are these proofs?

I asked him a question earlier, and he answered by asking another question.

Do you honestly believe that God-fearing Christians could never be deceived or would never lie?

Do you believe that there are God fearing atheists?

 

[Valjean]

So no answer to a fundamental question.
Evolution is just circular reasoning and the theory of nothing because it answers nothing about the origin of anything.

It doesn't claim to explain origins. It explains change.
How is it circular? Do you understand what a circular argument is? The mechanisms of evolution are pretty much common sense. People have been using selection in agriculture and animal husbandry for thousands of years. Selection works.

The mechanisms of evolution are observable and demonstrable. What, exactly, are your objections to them?