I do believe at 6'4", Jethro was highest in his class.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
I took it to be a sarcastic response evading a real response amid queries of the same to others.
You did not. You haven't done anything except declare victory for no observed reason.
If that is all it takes, then I have already refuted all the false claims declaring that the theory of evolution is false and has been refuted. And likewise to the claims that the age of the universe and the Earth are false and have been refuted.
Prove me wrong.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you were given answers.
I need to remind you that not getting the answers you want does not mean that no answers were given.
Shhhh it's a secret! To the cone of silence quick.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I find his debating style to be very useful. I used it to prove that there was no "Book of Genesis" in the Bible.
You're right. We need to "Get Smart". LOL!
Yes you did with a modern dino figurine you paid 1 peso for. The theory of evolution won't recover.
Using it, I determined "There can be only one" and I'm it. Christopher Lambert can just toddle off.
Gotta catch em all!
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
You have not refuted the theory of evolution by repeating the same rhetorical Gish gallop to the point of ad nauseam.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I used that in a VERY different thread today.
It has many applications apparently.
But, but, but, but...
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I thought that was Christopher Lloyd. Now what do I do with my DeLorean?
Not if a far more satisfactory explanation was available ─ as provided by the theory of evolution.
The trouble is ─ as I've mentioned before ─ that you haven't informed yourself about the what how and why of the modern theory of evolution or gained a working knowledge of the basics of genetics.
So the solution is in your hands, I'd say ─ the truth that will set you free.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Actually I understand it very well better than blinded evolutionists.
That is why I have refuted it using its weak links which is almost everything.
Then explain it so we can understand
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you really do not. Your own questions refute your claims. They demonstrate extreme ignorance on your part.
And then there is the question of why are you so afraid to learn what is and what is not evidence? And why are you so afraid to even learn what science is?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
No logic or science in your post.