From a scriptural standpoint (assigning a timeline to the Gospel description of the crucifixion) Jesus seems to have died in about a three hour period. This was highly unusual by Roman practice. Death usually took 24-48 hours, even with both legs broken to deny the victim to relieve the slow suffocation by taking on his body's weight by pressing his feet against the cross to support his weight.
One can compare the descriptions of the crucifixion of Jesus with the stories of the crucifixion of the Spartacus rebels, or other cases and see that it is not an ordinary event.
Jesus died quickly in an execution where the suffering dragged on for days.
This gives me reason to believe that God reduced the sufferings of Christ by taking Him quickly.
From Wikipedia:
"
The goal of Roman crucifixion was not just to kill the criminal, but also to mutilate and dishonour the body of the condemned. In ancient tradition, an honourable death required burial; leaving a body on the cross, so as to mutilate it and prevent its burial, was a grave dishonour.
Under ancient Roman penal practice, crucifixion was also a means of exhibiting the criminal’s low social status. It was the most dishonourable death imaginable, originally reserved for slaves, hence still called "supplicium servile" by
Seneca, later extended to provincial freedmen of obscure station ('humiles'). The elite of Roman society (only about 10% of the population) were almost never subject to capital punishments; instead, they were fined or exiled. Josephus mentions Jews of high rank who were crucified, but this was to point out that their status had been taken away from them. Control of one’s own body was vital in the ancient world.
Capital punishment took away control over one’s own body, thereby implying a loss of status and honour. The Romans often broke the prisoner's legs to hasten death and usually forbade burial."
Regards,
Scott