Raging hypocrisy if the Left

[Truth in love]

You were referring to crimes, so it is not out of order for me to expect examples of crimes. I have no idea what you are talking about regarding 10,000 crimes.

There is no evidence of fraud on any scale that would have resulted in an outcome different than the one that we have. I cannot dislike what is not there. Believing it is there is not evidence.

That is absolutely not true.

did you totally miss Clinton’s illegal server.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Me too went full tent on Gorsuch and then McGowen set her sites on Biden and found herself very alone as the movement was unwilling to take him on.

You may be correct on how it is an example of a double standard. But does one example make your case that it is persistent throughout or that impeachment of Trump should have been quashed as a result?

 

[Truth in love]

You may be correct on how it is an example of a double standard. But does one example make your case that it is persistent throughout or that impeachment of Trump should have been quashed as a result?

The entire point is that the double standards are harmful. If person A commits and crime and person B does they should be treated the same by the justice system. They are not.


The more concentrated the power in the hands of a few the more dangerous this becomes. We have many people in high offices who will not be held accountable for their actions simply because they have connections and people by the tens of millions go along with it. This will doom our nation.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

That is absolutely not true.

did you totally miss Clinton’s illegal server.

That is absolutely true that there is no evidence of widespread impact of voter fraud. I have seen no such evidence, though I have seen a lot of people that believe without ever being able to demonstrate more than belief.

I'm not up on all my conspiracy theories. How is the Clinton server issue supposed to be related to the outcome of the last election. Dare I ask.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The entire point is that the double standards are harmful. If person A commits and crime and person B does they should be treated the same by the justice system. They are not.


The more concentrated the power in the hands of a few the more dangerous this becomes. We have many people in high offices who will not be held accountable for their actions simply because they have connections and people by the tens of millions go along with it. This will doom our nation.

I see what you say as true, but that does not mean that Trump wasn't guilty.

 

[Yerda]

So why does a sitting VP threaten to without a billion or so bucks from a a nation over a an internal investigation????

Could be for any number of dubious reasons but if the investigation doesn't cover his son's time there it can't have been for his son, can it? I mean Hunter Biden wasn't facing investigations for any part in whatever fraud went on.

It still sounds awfy dodgy though.

 

[Truth in love]

That is absolutely true that there is no evidence of widespread impact of voter fraud. I have seen no such evidence, though I have seen a lot of people that believe without ever being able to demonstrate more than belief.

I'm not up on all my conspiracy theories. How is the Clinton server issue supposed to be related to the outcome of the last election. Dare I ask.

The sever did not but she blatantly broke the law and was given a pass.


There is evidence of fraud. Now we don’t have any convictions, but we have clear indications of it.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...nds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html#!

 

[Truth in love]

I see what you say as true, but that does not mean that Trump wasn't guilty.

No it does not. And I want him held accountable for his actions. I have several major gripes with him, but if the law is selectively enforced we are a banana republic and that’s not okay.

 

[Truth in love]

Could be for any number of dubious reasons but if the investigation doesn't cover his son's time there it can't have been for his son, can it? I mean Hunter Biden wasn't facing investigations for any part in whatever fraud went on.

It still sounds awfy dodgy though.

Well Hunters in bed with whoever is doing crud in the company. The company is being investigated. “Hey hunter if we go down so do you” or something to that effect would not be shocking. It’s not smoking gun, but far less of a streaky than strangers on a train.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The sever did not but she blatantly broke the law and was given a pass.


There is evidence of fraud. Now we don’t have any convictions, but we have clear indications of it.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...nds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html#!

What evidence is there that the existence would have radically altered the outcome of the election. Just repeating that isn't evidence or evidence that other evidence exists.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

No it does not. And I want him held accountable for his actions. I have several major gripes with him, but if the law is selectively enforced we are a banana republic and that’s not okay.

On that, I can agree.

 

[tytlyf]

did you totally miss Clinton’s illegal server.

Did you forget the FBI investigation into the server and the conclusion?
I understand your media doesn't want you to know those things.

 

[Willamena]

Pelosi et. al said that Trump needed to be impeached for threatening to withhold funds from the Ukraine.

They then preceded to push for Joe Biden to be president.

So is there a more clear example of raging double standards and denial of fact on the left?

What Trump did is wrong. What does that have to do with Biden?

 

[The Hammer]

Justifying being ethically as low as the Pubs?
Oh, dear.

Sometimes one must fight fire with fire.

 

[Revoltingest]

Sometimes one must fight fire with fire.

You 2 kids playing with fire will burn down the house.

 

[danieldemol]

The more concentrated the power in the hands of a few the more dangerous this becomes

Sounds like its time to give Kamala Harris a go at president, unless you'd prefer that power remains in the hands of the few.

In my opinion.

 

[The Hammer]

You 2 kids playing with fire will burn down the house.

It works for forest fires.

Edit: in the realm of politics, the Dems have been playing the "higher" road for too long, and letting way too much slide. If that destroys the union, well I won't be blaming them for it.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

That is absolutely not true.

did you totally miss Clinton’s illegal server.

Unfortunately for you the real law found that was irresponsible but not illegal.

 

[Revoltingest]

It works for forest fires.

Edit: in the realm of politics, the Dems have been playing the "higher" road for too long, and letting way too much slide. If that destroys the union, well I won't be blaming them for it.

Democrats think they take the high road, eh.
Self delusion is a very tribal thing.

 

[Truth in love]

What evidence is there that the existence would have radically altered the outcome of the election. Just repeating that isn't evidence or evidence that other evidence exists.

If you read the article it reports the numbers of highly suspicious votes that in the key swing states would be enough to change the outcome. You can watch 2000 miles and many other reports of fraud. Like the 100,000 votes in Georgia that went 100% for Biden.

I moved a fair bit over the years I’ve been in red, blue and purple counties. 100% for one side is not a real thing.