Me Myself
Back to my username
Well that's reasonable.But that is not what they are advocating in marriage.That's called compromise and it doesn't seem that's expected of Joe.Only Melissa .She wrote how if she is really not in the mood she does it anyway.If she said its a 'hard no" (sounds like its the exception) she describes how to be 'nice" about it.But that sounds like based on her account that she will have to pay for that the next day by him being less tolerant if she talks back they get in a "huge fight".OR he rips her clothes and does it anyway."Fights her " until 'he wins."
But on the 'mood" thing if its been 2 whole days ..Why should she be held accountable for HIS behavior ?Why is it up to her to regulate his moods ?He sounds like a big fat man child.Stomping around because he didn't get what he wanted when he wanted it.
Again, I am not defending a relationship I dont know. He does sound like a bravado attitude silly man child, but I cant pretend I know them.
I dont see anything wrong about having sex when you are not in the mood, my first time was like that. I wasnt in the mood and she was, and I noticed I would have really hurt her ego if I kept saying no, so we did it.
By what she said, you could call it "blackmail rape" but instead of anger feeling hurt. Its barely different. She has the right to feel however she wants, I can do however I please if I care for her emotions.
In any case, yeah, in general I believe a couple should both be willing to change to please each other and for the betterment of both learn to deal with their stuff, talk a lot, etc.
Again, what I am emphasising is that people have the right to feel however the feel, even if the feeling is not PC, because honestly, intense feelings can get very unPC. Its what you do with them where you start having limits into where the other person's rights start.