Alex_G
Enlightner of the Senses
I thought we see color because of cones in our eyes and such. Most people with normal vision can identify the color green, obviously there is something objective going on. Not understanding it currently does not mean we will never, but also realize that color relies on light, and light is not created by the mind so it must objectively exist. My argument is not for no subjectivity, it is against pure subjectivity.
Actually the qualitative experience of colour for you is ultimately a construct of your brain. Your cones in your eyes don’t themselves 'see' colour.
Ye there is likely something objective going on as you suspect, but i don’t think it’s proven simply by an appeal to the fact that individuals demonstrate an apparent lack of control over such perceptions.
I could see an argument like depression causes subjective changes in the way we view the world, and we cannot simply choose to not suffer from depression. However, that argument implies that depression has an objective cause; the brain. The brain must objectively exist for us to have depression we cannot choose to get rid of.
This is all actually quite an interesting subject, 'brain in a vat' theories and their objections/retorts etc. Its way too late here for me to stay up and dive into this stuff so im bowing out now im afraid. So im just going to lazily link to something and come back tomorrow.
Skepticism and Content Externalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)