Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Just like a Pokemon, it's all about the EXP.
...uh, what?
EXP is a term common in all RPGs; Pokemon wasn't even the first to use it. AD&D was.
What do experience points have to do with faith?
Lol, calm down, EXP stands for experience, that's all I meant. It's about personal experience.
What, all of it? Has this sort of media nothing to say, at all. And what makes the written word any more believable.?It would seem that you do not like the thought of theocratic encroachment on your way of thinking , but as a theist I prefer to avoid atheistic encroachment into my life , therefore I do not read newspapers or watch telivision and am selective about what radio I listen to!No luck there then. But why? Are you not interested in the whole of the world? Or if only the religious is there no doubt at all in the spiritual world?I started reading this forum out of interest and a wish to make my own assumptions about the world in which I live . I had allso chosen to read it because it is titled ' Religious forum ' I had hoped to escape atheistic scepticism !!!!!
What, all of it? Has this sort of media nothing to say, at all. And what makes the written word any more believable.?
I am very interested in the whole world , but as a religious practitioner I am of course interested in not only my own beleifs but the religious and spiritual beleifs of others .No luck there then. But why? Are you not interested in the whole of the world? Or if only the religious is there no doubt at all in the spiritual world?
All I meant was to be a Christian, one must believe in Christ, that's all. I believe God will restore the earth soon and there will be no more sin, death, tears or suffering.It doesn't matter if it was 98,000 years, 10,000 years or 2,000 years it's still proven suffering beyond anything we can imagine. And for what?
And what makes you think it's not going to continue?
Why did Jesus die? In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; Ephesians 1:7Either way...scapegoating doesn't work.
Originally Posted by ryanam All I meant was to be a Christian, one must believe in Christ, that's all. I believe God will restore the earth soon and there will be no more sin, death, tears or suffering.
All this (all reality for all time) can't be for nothing.What are the reasons for your belief in your faith and God?
All I meant was to be a Christian, one must believe in Christ, that's all. I believe God will restore the earth soon and there will be no more sin, death, tears or suffering.
Flesh cannot inherit the kingdom.
Why did Jesus die? In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; Ephesians 1:7
He died for the redemption of the human race.He didn't die to save anyone.
His salvation is found in His teachings...His parables.
He died for objection to His speech making.
From the moment he pronounced....
'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.'......
the pharisees sought to have Him dead.
Agreed.It may interest you to know, the 'golden rule' was not authored by the Carpenter.
It was written in stone, hundreds of years before Him.
No one knows who wrote it, first.
I don't think we are on the same page.But it was not considered law, by Moses.
Nobody is asking you to believe in the pain and suffering which occurred in the centuries before the human sacrifice. It happened. There is proof to support it in both science and scripture and due to the fact that it's still happening today.
The point is that you believe what you believe in spite of the known facts. Because of this, it makes God seem either unbelievably callous, capricious and lazy or unbelievably incompetent.
People are the only way that this planet is going to improve. Sin, death and tears are an integral part of being a human being by the way. I'd hate to live forever and never cry.
My Bible says, and I believe:He didn't die to save anyone. His salvation is found in His teachings...His parables.
All evidence points to something greater than ourselves. I made sure I found out what it was.
He died for the redemption of the human race.
The pharisees sought his death for claiming to be the Son of God.
Agreed.
Matthew 22:36-40
Nay...
36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” 37 And He said to him, “ ‘YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND.’ 38 This is the great and [a]foremost commandment. 39 The second is like it, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.’ 40 On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.”
Had you kept reading you would know...
'from this hour that sought to have Him dead.'
I don't think we are on the same page.
Originally Posted by ryanam
Nobody is asking you to believe in the pain and suffering which occurred in the centuries before the human sacrifice. It happened. There is proof to support it in both science and scripture and due to the fact that it's still happening today.
The point is that you believe what you believe in spite of the known facts. Because of this, it makes God seem either unbelievably callous, capricious and lazy or unbelievably incompetent.
People are the only way that this planet is going to improve. Sin, death and tears are an integral part of being a human being by the way. I'd hate to live forever and never cry.
I think you're forgetting the fact that, according to the Tanakh, God provided other ways for people to be alleviated from suffering.
It might help if you take a long close look at the poster's religion.If you do recognize it, take a long close look at your scripture and your god.
It might help if you take a long close look at the poster's religion.
I'll give you a hint: they aren't Christian or Jewish.
Are you saying the poster you quoted and responded to is Christian or Jewish, or you were not speaking to the poster you quoted?I already responded to the initial post. This was obviously in response to the person who was quoted... kinda how the whole forum method works.