Reasons for believing in the Bible as the literal word of God.

[Trailblazer]

Now now, she was not really referring to you. And yes, she is right.

I was referring to you and I am right.

 

[ppp]

Yup. I knew there would be No comment on those verses found at Exodus 8:32 and 1st Samuel 6:6

You betcha. I don't take quotes as primary discussion. If you cannot speak for yourself, then there is no point in conversing with you.

 

[Trailblazer]

So what?

So nothing. I was just correcting your misconception regarding Baha'u'llah.

 

[Trailblazer]

Now if you could only show that you realize that you were wrong. You admit it often enough.

No, he does not admit it. You admit it for him.

 

[URAVIP2ME]

You betcha. I don't take quotes as primary discussion. If you cannot speak for yourself, then there is no point in conversing with you.

Right, if you are Not willing to discuss the Bible there is No common ground.
I did Not quote but made reference as to where in the Bible the information is located.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So nothing. I was just correcting your misconception regarding Baha'u'llah.

There was no misconception. You simply and irrationally refuse to understand the use of colloquial speech.
'
But since you do not understand the use of colloquial speech the writing of your fearless leader are just "So what?" evidence as well.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No, he does not admit it. You admit it for him.

Well someone has to. When he writes posts that are false on the face of them their true meaning must be made clear.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I was referring to you and I am right.

No, that describes you far better than me. You are another that refuses to argue rationally.

 

[Trailblazer]

There was no misconception. You simply and irrationally refuse to understand the use of colloquial speech.
'
But since you do not understand the use of colloquial speech the writing of your fearless leader are just "So what?" evidence as well.

Why are you evading what I said and changing the subject?
This has nothing to do with colloquial speech. That is just a smokescreen.
This is about what Baha'u'llah wrote, what are claims and what are Writings with no claims.

 

[ppp]

Right, if you are Not willing to discuss the Bible there is No common ground.

I just referenced passages from the Bible directly, so obviously I am willing to discuss it. And I used my own words, to express my own thoughts about those passages. That is what conversation is. Merely quoting (or refererencing) is of no interest to me. None. If it is to you, that is fine. I am sure you can find someone who will oblige you.

 

[dybmh]

No, I am merely stating that I am unaware of which of your countless errors that you are referring to. But it is nice that you still think that I can read your mind. Don't worry, I really cannot see all of your dirty little secrets.

I know you can't see them, SubD. I know. I've tried pointing them out. But they go into a void. And when you make claim, trying to have real discussion is useless. No, I am certain you cannot read my mind. No I don't have any dirty secrets. But I am not inviting you to into my personal life to find that out for yourself.

 

[Trailblazer]

Well someone has to. When he writes posts that are false on the face of them their true meaning must be made clear.

No, nobody has to and nobody should put words in others' mouths. People can speak for themselves.

 

[Audie]

You betcha. I don't take quotes as primary discussion. If you cannot speak for yourself, then there is no point in conversing with you.

Yup

 

[ppp]

No, nobody has to and nobody should put words in others' mouths. People can speak for themselves.

You have something against pointing out when one's interlocutor is being disingenous or irrational?

 

[dybmh]

However, some Egyptians did Not harden their hearts and left Egypt with the Israelites.

Really good point. If it was so unjust what happened with the plagues, the the mixed multitude would not have joined them. Brilliant!

At the time of Christ those Jewish citizens were blood guilty (Deut. 21:1-9) because they were culpable as to a community responsibility they failed to bring justice to Jesus.

Interesting. I had never considered that. I'd like to ponder before responding more. Thank you.

 

[Audie]

I just referenced passages from the Bible directly, so obviously I am willing to discuss it. And I used my own words, to express my own thoughts about those passages. That is what conversation is. Merely quoting (or refererencing) is of no interest to me. None. If it is to you, that is fine. I am sure you can find someone who will oblige you.

Better to just put two bibles together, walk off and
them have a nice private chat.

 

[ppp]

Better to just put two bibles together, walk off and
them have a nice private chat.

Hush! Someone at Pureflix will hear you and think that is a great idea!

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know you can't see them, SubD. I know. I've tried pointing them out. But they go into a void. And when you make claim, trying to have real discussion is useless. No, I am certain you cannot read my mind. No I don't have any dirty secrets. But I am not inviting you to into my personal life to find that out for yourself.

No, if you found actual errors of mine I could see them. You are once again projecting Or have you forgotten how you lost with the claim of "your evidence"? That was explained to you more than once. If there is a post that you wanted explained better you to be specific about which error of yours you were complaining about.

Once again, I am not a mind reader. And you seemed to not understand when I said that.

 

[dybmh]

No, if you found actual errors of mine I could see them.

its called a self-reinforcing delusion for a reason.

You are once again projecting Or have you forgotten how you lost with the claim of "your evidence"? That was explained to you more than once. If there is a post that you wanted explained better you to be specific about which error of yours you were complaining about.

Once again, I am not a mind reader. And you seemed to not understand when I said that.

you simply are not aware of how you flip everything around, and deny deny deny any rational discussion. and even if I do everything to make your job easier, to help you stay on track you sabatoge it.

I did this yesterday, I did what you said I quoted you, then I quoted ou again, and I quoted three times in a row, and you answer was.. "i didn't say that" then "I already said, you lose"

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why are you evading what I said and changing the subject?
This has nothing to do with colloquial speech. That is just a smokescreen.
This is about what Baha'u'llah wrote, what are claims and what are Writings with no claims.

Wow, do I have to hold your hand "What Baha . .. said" means his writings. I did not change the subject. And yes, colloquial speech applies because that was what I was using. Wow!