All of theory is based solely on experiment. It follows that you can't know the effects of consciousness, the cause, or how it arose. you also can't calculate all of the forces and their interactions on a rocket's trajectory.
And yet, rockets arrive at their destination pretty precisely as per the calculations. So it doesn't seem like this supposed "variable" of consciousness, which you assert without evidence, has much of an impact on anything.
The rocket works not because you are so smarter that you know everything but because individuals worked out the bugs for the last century; many many individuals with many of them a lot smarter than you or me.
Ok. I don't remember claiming that rockets work because of me, but ok.
All ideas are individual and every individual is standing on the shoulders of giants but this doesn't mean any of them know or knew everything.
Ok. I don't remember claiming that someone, or anyone, knows everything, but ok.
Just like you and most people they thought they knew everything or at least knew how to google it. Every one of them could lecture on the the importance of fuel for rockets and good calculations for consumption and trajectory. Not one of them in 1925 or today could do it all. Not one of them could successfully perform brain surgery. Not one of them understood the interactions in the elemental forces involved in the launch of a rocket. Not one of them knew what every caveman knew.
Ok. I don't remember making any of these claims either, but ok.
Meanwhile: newtonian physics still works very well to get rockets into space.
Even though not a single rocket scientists, rocket mathematician, rocket programmer, or rocket designer knew much of anything at all most of them were sure they knew most everything and they were all members of the species "homo omnisciencis".
Everything has everything to do with everything.
I mean the bolded sentence literally. Every experiment, every everything affects the trajectory of a rocket and this certainly includes every single thing that science has failed to reduce to experiment such as consciousness.
The tide imparted by the most distant galaxies affect the rocket. The ambient temperature at launch affects the trajectory of a rocket. A butterfly in China can bring down a space shuttle.
Despite the impossible complexity of reality most individuals just shrug it off because they know everything. You don't need to see a big picture when you think you can see every puzzle piece with a microscope.
Cool. And yet, rockets arrive at their destination with pretty awesome precision.
So these mysterious unevidenced variables you claim play a role... it doesn't seem to be that big of a role.
You couldn't possibly be more wrong.
Ow, we could be very much more wrong. We could be so wrong that rockets simply don't work and never get to their destination.
But clearly they do. So it can't be
that wrong.
You think you don't need to see anything but you are wrong. Without the big picture you are as blind as a bat
So blind that rockets nevertheless arrive at their destination with more then enough precision.
that can see only what it knows or cricket or even a cricket bat that sees nothing at all. But you can only assume an appliance isn't conscious because you have no definition for it.
Sure, sure.
Call us when you have worked out the "conscious" variable in how it affects rocket trajectories and then upgrade the equations and demonstrate how they are now more precise.
Until then, newtonian physics seems to work just fine to get rockets into orbit.
