George Washington
*banned*
Bill Maher is an old school Democrat. He's quite different from the Democrats we see in Portland for example, who defund police, decriminalize theft, etc.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Republicans consider removing Biden from state ballots. A new fad is born.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
George Washington
*banned*
Did Trump literally say that people should break into the Capital building? Or are we going off so called dog-whistle words that he might have said?
I believe you, but I hope the Supreme Court refuses to review the case. If it does I have to write 2 Trump's Wet Nose haikus."The Colorado Supreme Court decision was over 120 pages, and I read every word of every page, and I understood every single word because I’ve studied the issue. The Colorado Supreme Court addressed every single state law question and every single federal constitutional question as to the meaning and interpretation of the 14th Amendment. I know for a fact that it resolved each and every one of those questions as required not just under state law, but, more importantly, under federal constitutional law. That’s why I said that the opinion is unassailable in every respect. It is a masterful judicial opinion, and based on the objective law of the 14th, I believe that the Supreme Court should — and I believe it will — affirm the Colorado Supreme Court if given the opportunity."
-J. Michael Luttig... conservative legal scholar
‘The Opposite of Politics’: A Conservative Legal Scholar Says Kicking Trump Off the Ballot Is ‘Unassailable’
J. Michael Luttig explains why he thinks the 14th Amendment should prevent Trump from running for president again.www.politico.com
IndigoChild5559
Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
I'm not going to debate this with you. In testimony after testimony, insurrectionists said they did what they did because it was what Trump wanted. You can choose to ignore this if you wish, that's on you.
Someone has been watching Fox News.
George Washington
*banned*
No, these foolish people have never met Donald Trump. Alot of them were partaking in Qanan conspiracy nonsense, and also believed Hillary Clinton was drinking baby blood, straight from the vein, in the basement of a pizza parlor.
The insurrectionists were Qanan wacko's.
George Washington
*banned*
Not too often, but sometimes. Have you ever watched Fox News? I'm curious if it airs in other countries.
Heavens, not here in Brazil, despite the encouragement from Bozo.
But it has imitators among the humor-and-libel crowd out there. GB News for one.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Remember when I mentioned Democrats create their own monsters?
Welcome to the newest political fad to hit the scene!
The fine art of removing one's political opponents from state ballots. Convictions no longer required.
I suggest everyone now becomes only a write in candidate for all future elections henceforth , then nobody will have to deal with that pesky and irritating ballot list anymore.
So what you're saying is that we shouldn't hold republicans accountable because they'll throw temper tantrums? Also, doesn't matter if people write in Trump if the constitution forbids treasonous traitors from holding office.
IndigoChild5559
Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
I think that most people, at least once in their lives if not more, run into a person who, when CLEARLY caught in a wrong, continues to deny it absurdly, and who gets angry that you are exposing them. The very next thing they do is claim, "Well, but YOU do this or that." This is exactly how Trump responds when he is caught in crimes. He simply denies denies denies, despite being caught red handed. And the next thing he does is attack Joe Biden for imagined offenses. The GOP usually mimics this. I'm not at all surprised that the GOP is trying to impeach Biden, and to keep him off the ballot. But do I take it seriously? Hardly.
Remember when I mentioned Democrats create their own monsters?
Welcome to the newest political fad to hit the scene!
The fine art of removing one's political opponents from state ballots. Convictions no longer required.
I suggest everyone now becomes only a write in candidate for all future elections henceforth , then nobody will have to deal with that pesky and irritating ballot list anymore.
Last edited:
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Well that's the purpose of the trial in March in the matter of Trump.
President Biden alternatively will be handled in due time and the investigations and possibly Court actions will determine it just like they will with Trump.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
For what?
IndigoChild5559
Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
The many indictments against him.
This is click bait. The OP article doesn't support there being any significant Republican efforts to remove Biden from the ballot. It cites two Republicans that considered the idea and rejected it. It has but one lone example of a Republican candidate for Congress that made a social media posting to remove him from the Florida ballot. The article doesn't show any serious Republican attempts to remove Biden from the ballot.
Remember when I mentioned Democrats create their own monsters?
Welcome to the newest political fad to hit the scene!
The fine art of removing one's political opponents from state ballots. Convictions no longer required.
I suggest everyone now becomes only a write in candidate for all future elections henceforth , then nobody will have to deal with that pesky and irritating ballot list anymore.
That's Trump supporters. Not exactly the sharpest tools in the shed.
It's banned in France, which is a smart move on their part. There is plenty of reputable news sources, why allow fraudulent sources?
I do watch some of the right wing media just to see what they say, and it is exceptionally poor journalism. It's heavily biased based on the language they use.
It's an exceptionally strong case. If Trump thought he could mount a winning defence he wouldn't be trying to delay, or get the immunity appeal submitted. The guy is scared. His only hope is to dupe enough citizens to get re-elected (my a minority of voters, and via the electoral system).
Of course the difference is no evidence that Biden has done anything illegal. Comer gets his *** handed to him even in interviews on FOX.
George Washington
*banned*
Gee, thanks. I'm a Trump supporter, and you just basically called me stupid. Do you insult everyone you disagree with?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Perhaps you should ask yourself why you are a Trump voter.
George Washington
*banned*
I already know why. He represents my political preferences more than any other politician.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Does he though? He may be promising what he never delivered or hand any intention of delivering.
George Washington
*banned*
He made a lot of progress last time around. He built the wall, stopped funding terrorists in Iran, and began with the Chinese tariffs. These are the things that help America become better IMO. He has more plans as well, such as building 7 new American cities, and other good-for-America ideas.
I'm not sure what all he can do, but his ideas are in the right direction according to my own personal preferences. I'd like to give him another chance and see.