CG Didymus
Veteran Member
Who kept the records of all this? From Abraham to the guy who became Baha'u'llah? Wow"Baha'u'llah was descended from Abraham through both Sarah and Keturah"?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who kept the records of all this? From Abraham to the guy who became Baha'u'llah? Wow"Baha'u'llah was descended from Abraham through both Sarah and Keturah"?
So Baha'is believe all people descended from Adam and Eve... About 6000 years ago?Everything is not in the Bible but just because it is not in the Bible does not mean it is not true.
Take a look at this genealogy chart: The Divine Standard Unfurled : Genealogy of Baha'u'llah
I did not want to post it before because it is not from an official Baha’i website, but it is the most detailed genealogy chart I know of. The squabbles between the real Baha’is and the Covenant-breakers do not really matter... They got the genealogy which leads to Baha’u’llah...That is what matters....
I do not know if anyone has kept records of ALL of this but ALL the records certainly are not recorded in the Bible, since it stops with Jesus.Who kept the records of all this? From Abraham to the guy who became Baha'u'llah? Wow
No, we certainly do not believe that. Adam ushered in the Cycle of Prophecy, which is part of the present Universal Cycle of religion. Humans existed long before Adam and Eve. Before the present Universal Cycle there were many other Universal Cycles of religion.So Baha'is believe all people descended from Adam and Eve... About 6000 years ago?
I, at times, believed them both, but I see problems with both views now... and I see a ton of contradictions. You say you don't believe the Genesis Creation story, yet another Baha'i is claiming a genealogy that goes back to Adam thru Abraham on up to Baha'u'llah. So does that make Adam the first man? Did he live to be more than 900 years? Did he exist approximately 6000 years ago? Baha'is don't believe any of that. So when did the Bible get accurate on being historical? Or did it ever get accurate? Yet, you use prophesies that pin point exact dates?You are playing the devil's advocate (figure of speech, not literal). You believe in neither the view of the Baha'is, nor the evangelical Christians, yet use the Christian arguments against the Baha'is. Wouldn't it be a more meaningful conversation to argue from your perspective? Who are you and what do you believe? Do you not see the gospels as fabrications of fallible men in the absence of a God that for you probably doesn't exist? There is no contradiction but you need that contradiction to exist to legitimise your agnosticism.
In regards creation and genesis the Baha'is are not saying anything new. Science is on our side. In regards the symbolism and allegory within the sacred texts, modern scholarship largely supports the Baha'i view.
The issues at hand go way beyond either the Evangelical Christians or Baha'is.
Then how do we know this is the true genealogy? In fact, how many people believe Adam was really the first human? And then, all those people that lived hundreds of years? And then, Abraham didn't have his son Isaac until he was like a 100 years old or something? So what do Baha'is believe? All this is symbolic or these were real people?I do not know if anyone has kept records of ALL of this but ALL the records certainly are not recorded in the Bible, since it stops with Jesus.
Part of what I've been getting at is... Did Adam even exist? If he did, what in the Bible is true and what is myth? If Baha'is don't believe in the Creation Story, why believe in Adam? Why make him a manifestation? Why give him a "cycle"?No, we certainly do not believe that. Adam ushered in the Cycle of Prophecy, which is part of the present Universal Cycle of religion. Humans existed long before Adam and Eve. Before the present Universal Cycle there were many other Universal Cycles of religion.
TABLE: BAHA'I SACRED HISTORY
I. PREVIOUS UNIVERSAL CYCLES - of which no trace remains
II. PRESENT UNIVERSAL CYCLE
· A. ADAMIC CYCLE, CYCLE OF PROPHECY - lasted approximately 6,000 years
1. Adam 1. Indian religious figures
2. Noah - Krishna
3. Abraham
4. Moses 2. Zoroaster
5. Jesus 3. Buddha
6. Muhammad
+ Other unknown or unspecified prophets
· B. BAHA'I CYCLE, CYCLE OF FULFILLMENT - to last 500,000 years
1. The Bab
2. Bahá'u'lláh - Universal Manifestation for this Universal Cycle
a. Heroic, Primitive, or Apostolic Age - 1844-1921 (or 1932 - the death of Bahiyyih Khanum)
i. Ministry of the Bab (1844-53)
ii. Ministry of Bahá'u'lláh (1853-92)
iii. Ministry of `Abdu'l-Bahá (1892-1921)
b. Formative, Transitional, or Iron Age - 1921 -
i. First Epoch (1921-44/46) - Erection of the Administrative Order
ii. Second Epoch (1946-63) - spread of the Faith beyond the confines of the Western Hemisphere
iii. Third Epoch (1963-86) - emergence of the Faith from obscurity and initiation of social and economic development plans
iv. Fourth Epoch (1986- ) - national communities taking on the responsibility for their own development
v. Successive further Epochs
c. Golden Age
Successive Epochs leading to the Most Great Peace
3. Further Manifestations - under the shadow of Bahá'u'lláh
· END OF PRESENT UNIVERSAL CYCLE
III. FURTHER UNIVERSAL CYCLES
Ages and Cycles
I do not know how we know and I do not think it really matters if we can prove it. Christians challenge Baha's and say that Baha'ullah cannot be who He claimed to be, the Messiah, because He is not descended from David, that is how this all starts. I think it can be proven by a genealogist but that is not my field.Then how do we know this is the true genealogy? In fact, how many people believe Adam was really the first human? And then, all those people that lived hundreds of years? And then, Abraham didn't have his son Isaac until he was like a 100 years old or something? So what do Baha'is believe? All this is symbolic or these were real people?
I really do not know anything for sure but Baha'u'llah knew, because Baha'u'llah had the knowledge of God:Part of what I've been getting at is... Did Adam even exist? If he did, what in the Bible is true and what is myth? If Baha'is don't believe in the Creation Story, why believe in Adam? Why make him a manifestation? Why give him a "cycle"?
Rough Beast, of course I understood that KAP and KP were abbreviations of Caesar in Greek. You seem to get strange ideas popping up in your head in order to convince yourself that only you have studied the Jesus story.Why would they use upper case Alpha and Rho in a contraction, instead of the lower case letters as in the actual word?
BTW do you have a source for this? If you came up with it yourself it is quite creative. Especially since until recently you did not even know they were Greek letters.
Indeed! Thank goodness for that!Of course, it does not change my previous criticism that the Aramaic speaking and mostly illiterate population at large would have no concept of what it was supposed to mean and therefore not be upset about it.
This is what they mean by "PROGRESSIVE REVELATION"Who kept the records of all this? From Abraham to the guy who became Baha'u'llah? Wow
In relation to earth's 4.5 billion yearsDo you mean estimating the half life of argon or when argon came into existence?
This is Fake NewsYes, it split off. Look at the diagonal line on the genealogy chart:
Genealogy of The Báb and Bahá'u'lláh
If it's not in the Bible then why you insist that it's in the Bible when it's not.Everything is not in the Bible but just because it is not in the Bible does not mean it is not true.
Take a look at this genealogy chart: The Divine Standard Unfurled : Genealogy of Baha'u'llah
I did not want to post it before because it is not from an official Baha’i website, but it is the most detailed genealogy chart I know of. The squabbles between the real Baha’is and the Covenant-breakers do not really matter... They got the genealogy which leads to Baha’u’llah...That is what matters....
Calculation of the age of the earth's age is based on radiometric testing of a number of isotopes of which argon is just one. Analysis of meteorites is particularly important.In relation to earth's 4.5 billion years
In regards the resurrection consider modern biblical scholarship. Use of allegory and symbolism is well established throughout both the NT and OT. I don't believe there's anything Baha'is are saying that bible scholars are not.Then how do we know this is the true genealogy? In fact, how many people believe Adam was really the first human? And then, all those people that lived hundreds of years? And then, Abraham didn't have his son Isaac until he was like a 100 years old or something? So what do Baha'is believe? All this is symbolic or these were real people?
Everything is a fake to Christians except what they believe.This is Fake News
I never said that. Please quote me saying that the genealogy of Baha’u’llah is in the Bible.If it's not in the Bible then why you insist that it's in the Bible when it's not.
We do not adulterate anything. Baha’is have no doctrines. It is the Christians who adulterate the Bible to fit their doctrines. All we do is explain what the Bible means according to our own beliefs. Christians do not OWN the Bible. Funny thing, it is fine when scholars or anyone else explains what the Bible means, but it is not okay for Baha’is to have their own opinions.And as they move on to the next revelation they don’t have any choice but to alter or adulterate the word of God so it will fit into their doctrine, i.e., if they are preaching to Christians.
Nobody feeds us except the Original Writings of Baha’u’llah and Abdu’l-Baha. Baha’is have no leaders that tell us what to believe. Christians have leaders and they just follow those leaders, the Church, instead of thinking for themselves. They have just accepted the Church doctrines that were decided upon by councils of mere men, that have been fed to them for almost 2000 years.Just feed them with rhetoric to energize their thinking, without deducting, and they would follow their leaders no matter what. They don’t have to think, just follow the leaders.
https://www.religiousforums.com/bible/matthew/15:14/“So blind hath become the human heart that neither the disruption of the city, nor the reduction of the mountain in dust, nor even the cleaving of the earth, can shake off its torpor. The allusions made in the Scriptures have been unfolded, and the signs recorded therein have been revealed, and the prophetic cry is continually being raised. And yet all, except such as God was pleased to guide, are bewildered in the drunkenness of their heedlessness!” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 39“Let them alone: they are blind guides. And if the blind guide the blind, both shall fall into a pit.” Matthew 15:14
We do not adulterate anything.
Based on the Bible there is NO Baha'u'llah or the the son of Baha'u'llah that came from David but you insisted Baha'u'llah came from David through Sarah and Keturah. Isn't that twisting/adulterating the word of God?So anyway, the short answer is that yes, Baha'u'llah was a descendant of David.”
Is Baha'u'llah related to King David? | Interfaith forums