Let's assume for argument's sake that Rittenhouse really did think that he was justified in shooting the first person.Two People, Murderer?
Someone attempting to shoot someone who got shot instead, is called the unfortunate attemted murderer killed by a victim.
Did you see the full video?
Did you see how he was twice attacked by someone attempting to shoot him?
How another man attacked him with a scateboard?
He did not shoot anyone else, eccept his assailents!
Not like BLM and ANTIFA activist, Reinoehl who killed Aaron J. Danielson, from Patriot Prayer in cold blood, when he was unarmed.
Remember how the leftist media tried to make Reinoehl out as non BLM?
Well, from where I am standing, the USA have huge problems with BLM and Antifa. They are terrorists, killers, and the Dem leaders never hesetated to use them to create chaos, and with your leftist media, tried to blame the Conservatists.
Anyhow, the evidence from the state witnesses already shows that Rittenhouse should be given a medal for his bravery and military skils.
Even when someone shoots in self-defense, he would be a fool to think that he wouldn't be disarmed, detained, and questioned by the police until they were satisfied that the shooting really was in self-defense. Shooting someone in self-defense doesn't give you the right to shoot your way out.
OTOH, put yourself in Grosskreutz's shoes: you know that Rittenhouse has just killed two people and has the means to kill again. It would have been entirely justified for Grosskreutz to shoot Rittenhouse.