I'd call your language poetic.Is it hyperbole....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd call your language poetic.Is it hyperbole....
Actualy every single western democracy is founded on the principle of seperation of powers and individual rights.
The ones like Pence, yes. Not beyond words, but he's a great example of Christians enforcing their own morality and religious beliefs upon others, and to discriminatory and damaging ends.I take it all back. You're right. THEY are truly horrible beyond words.
Since when has this been mandatory?More than that, you do not even address American exceptionalism.
Democracy is antithetical to individual rights.
More than that, you do not even address American exceptionalism. It is not separation of unlimited powers but the notion of limited government that separates America from the rest of the world.
its a gray area but no. Not in my opinion. They just seem like they want to turn this prayer spot into a farce as part of a protest against religion in government. Separation of church and state is the issue. They don't like that there is prayer instituted over the meeting. That's what its about. They want to protest, sue to stop the prayers I'd support it. Satanists praying just to make fun of prayer? Not. Don't care. May as well have a comedian come in and do a fake prayer in protest to the religious prayers Same thing to me.Satanic Temple Sues Boston Over Opening Prayer Policy
I'd rather see no prayer in government institutions, but am not against traditional practices.
I do side with the Satanists that it is religious discrimination solely on the basis they are not aligned with Abrahamic doctrines.
Otherwise I think the policy should end.
Should they be allowed opening prayer?
I think so.
Hey, now!America is supposed to be a shining beacon to the rest of the world?
Oh I hate to be the bearer of bad news guys.
Yes, he is. At issue is whether or not he's a great example of Christians, particularly those seeking to implement the guidelines of the Council. Perhaps he is, but I've seen no evidence that this is true. I'm open to being persuaded.The ones like Pence, yes. Not beyond words, but he's a great example of Christians enforcing their own morality and religious beliefs upon others, and to discriminatory and damaging ends.
Satanic Temple Sues Boston Over Opening Prayer Policy
I'd rather see no prayer in government institutions, but am not against traditional practices.
I do side with the Satanists that it is religious discrimination solely on the basis they are not aligned with Abrahamic doctrines.
Otherwise I think the policy should end.
Should they be allowed opening prayer?
I think so.
Why? I am betting that you have zero understanding of their beliefs.Pure insanity to side with Satanists.
THE PERVERSION OF EQUALITY strikes again.
Here's a group who had to be ordered out of the room because they were that explicitly opposed to Constitutional rights being extended to others.Yes, he is. At issue is whether or not he's a great example of Christians, particularly those seeking to implement the guidelines of the Council. Perhaps he is, but I've seen no evidence that this is true. I'm open to being persuaded.
That is why we are a secular democratic republic. A country with a guarantee of personal rights, even if you do disagree with some of them. America was not based upon Christianity.Actually, you are confusing a nations current form of government with it's founding principles. Democracy is antithetical to individual rights. More than that, you do not even address American exceptionalism. It is not separation of unlimited powers but the notion of limited government that separates America from the rest of the world.
I am sorry but you just don't get it. If anything the "hate group" would be the Christians. They are trying to hold illegal prayers. That they know prayers are not part pf the process is shown by the trying to ban others from leading prayers. The negative imagery is coming from the Christians.If they really wanted to be something positive in the world then their message wouldn't play off of negative imagery from Christian perspective. They're anti-Christian political entity backed by donations from people who have whatever reason to hate Christianity. All that nonsense about benevolence is spin.
They're a hate group. They chose to embrace that image and so can't complain for being in that category.
They claim they don't even believe in Satan. So their prayer is a farce. If they can't take it serious they shouldn't be involved. And even if they do believe in satan; then that's even more disturbing ... so I guess we can be thankful for that at least.I am sorry but you just don't get it. If anything the "hate group" would be the Christians. They are trying to hold illegal prayers. That they know prayers are not part pf the process is shown by the trying to ban others from leading prayers. The negative imagery is coming from the Christians.
Why does not make their prayer a farce. You really have no clue what Satanism is. You have a wrong impression of it. They do not have prayer services to the devil.They claim they don't even believe in Satan. So their prayer is a farce. If they can't take it serious they shouldn't be involved. And even if they do believe in satan; then that's even more disturbing ... so I guess we can be thankful for that at least.
Legitimate religions wanting to pray is one thing but it's just that people are disturbed by satanists and their farcical prayer services to the devil. There is no reason for anyone to stand for it.
A lot of us don't. We're often atheist or agnostic. Sometimes theist, but not often. And the Satanic Temple does lean towards atheism and agnosticism.They claim they don't even believe in Satan.
Ya know, I'm pretty sure most of this post violates RF rules. I didn't report, because I want this to be emphasized and focused. All this coming a "love your neighbor as thyself" Christian.So their prayer is a farce.
Who says they aren't taking it seriously? What makes you say this?If they can't take it serious they shouldn't be involved.
Why?And even if they do believe in satan; then that's even more disturbing
Legitimate religions?Legitimate religions wanting to pray is one thing but it's just that people are disturbed by satanists and their farcical prayer services to the devil.
You stand confident in your response, but all you've done is show a flash of brilliance in ignorance. Throwing out wild accusations, and nothing of substance to support these claims.There is no reason for anyone to stand for it.
The lady doth protest too much. Perhaps he sees how week the prayers that Christians try to foist off on others is. This sort of display only underscores that fact. The Satanists are ruining their cherished fantasy.A lot of us don't. We're often atheist or agnostic. Sometimes theist, but not often. And the Satanic Temple does lean towards atheism and agnosticism.
Ya know, I'm pretty sure most of this post violates RF rules. I didn't report, because I want this to be emphasized and focused. All this coming a "love your neighbor as thyself" Christian.
Who says they aren't taking it seriously? What makes you say this?
Why?
Legitimate religions?
Farcical Prayer?
Disturbed?
You stand confident in your response, but all you've done is show a flash of brilliance in ignorance. Throwing out wild accusations, and nothing of substance to support these claims.
You've not even quoted any Satanic or LHP literature.
I doubt it.Perhaps he sees how week the prayers that Christians try to foist off on others is.
Fundamentalists and Evangelicals are often frightened of Satanists (and atheists). In one Pensacola video, we can hear a man protesting the Satanist, claiming the Satanist will throw out curses. They literally believe he will summon demons, and bring forth a demonic presence with his invocation.The Satanists are ruining their cherished fantasy.