I think this is appropriate.
What about the social sciences, which explicitly study things like human beliefs, cultures, and ideas?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think this is appropriate.
Not caring for anything whatsoever is of course what evolutionists teach.
What about the social sciences, which explicitly study things like human beliefs, cultures, and ideas?
Isn't that a bit of a stretch?
I like science. I believe in evolution.
I believe God is stirring the chemistry.
I am not entirely apathetic.
It is vastly more surprisingly true than that it is a stretch.
Apparently I have more respect for people who hold the notion of evolution as true.
I care.
Can you give us some examples, please ?
Isn't that a bit of a stretch?
I like science. I believe in evolution.
I believe God is stirring the chemistry.
I am not entirely apathetic.
Short answer ... tradition and the reluctance to change/progress has caused this split.I think that science and religion are allies and not enemies. The confusion stems from what they do, and from the fact they look at issues from a different perspective.
Science is based on observation, experience and experiments. It can tell how things, the way they work. It Is good for independently verifying facts, extrapolating from an experience.
Religion is good at moral questions and setting up a system of thought that is consistent.
They are not the enemies of each other. Each plays a part in society, and one should not be seen better then the other. They play, in fact, a complimentary role to each other, in a way one hand washes the other.
Why has religion and science been placed in an adversarial role ? Why do some religions suggest and propose absurd thins, stop progress and act in a manner that is the opposite that human beings want to live ? What can we, personally do, to erase the so called " War", and help religion and science see they compliment each other, and should not be turned into enemies ?
Please, teacher, teach us all about ourselves. We'd never know what with living with ourselves and all. We rely on your superior knowledge of what we are more than the actual experience of being ourselves. We shine only under your superior tutelage.Not caring for anything whatsoever is of course what evolutionists teach.
Please, teacher, teach us all about ourselves. We'd never know what with living with ourselves and all. We rely on your superior knowledge of what we are more than the actual experience of being ourselves. We shine only under your superior tutelage.
I think this is appropriate.
What about them?
I'm assuming you are classifying the social sciences in with the hard sciences as if they were they were the same thing.
And besides, the study of people doing things doesn't make the things that they do any more legitimate, right?
There can of course never be any peace with such a view. Love is a matter of opinion, not fact, and any who advertises the view that it is fact is an enemy of Islam, democracy and just civilization in general.
Which isn't something Christianity can say.To be fair, there hardly seems like there is anything that isn't an enemy of Islam, except Islam itself.
Which isn't something Christianity can say.
Please, teacher, teach us all about ourselves. We'd never know what with living with ourselves and all. We rely on your superior knowledge of what we are more than the actual experience of being ourselves. We shine only under your superior tutelage.
I humbly await your next instruction in what a pathetic human being those of us who understand science are. Perhaps, under your supreme tutelage, I shall come to understand that only you truly understand science, only you truly understand me, and that I can know these things only through you.Subjectivity is a creationist concept. And we can all see how evolutionists are on the forums, and in general, that they suck at subjectivity.
Social sciences study what people believe. A blanket statement that "science doesn't care what you believe" is simply incorrect. That, and the entire statement is something of an anthropomorphism. Sciences, not being persons, can neither "care" nor "not care" about anything. Kind of makes that entire poster/meme/whatever little more than a political statement designed to buttress personal values or point of view. I'm not really sure what the point of posting that was, actually.
Why would you make such an odd assumption? Curious.