Science cannot solve the final mystery

[cladking]

Than why even bring up Hancock. Whether the pyramid was built for a tomb is not an issue as to how it was built, Nonetheless the pyramids were used as tombs.

I didn't bring up Hancock. You did.

I can't recreate an entire thread in response to a single post.

The builders said numerous times that the PYRAMID WAS NOT A TOMB and they said many many dozens of times that the pyramid was the dead king himself. By this it is quite apparent that they meant the pyramid served as a mnemonic to remember the dead king by day. They also said that he was remembered by a star at night when the pyramid was invisible.

Akhification/ transmogrification was the process by which the dead king was changed into a living star and a living pyramid. This is quite clear if you believe the builders, the Pyramid Texts, and don't first assume they were superstitious. Egyptologists never did this. They knew their progeny was superstitious so they assumed the builders were as well. So now we've had 4,000 years of detour and science against religion.

 

[shunyadragon]

I didn't bring up Hancock. You did.

Actually you did here:

There are many dozens of threads where I've clearly shown the pyramid is NOT A TOMB. Here is one where I show what the pyramid actually is in the builders' own words;

The King as Pyramid - Graham Hancock Official Website

The builders said over and over and over that the pyramid is not a tomb and the king's tomb was in the sky. Egyptologists simply dismiss all this as nonsense, metaphor, and symbolism. The builders never once said or implied that any king was entombed in any great pyramid. This is all in the minds of modern people. Even Herodotus said repeatedly that the pyramid was not a tomb and Khufu was buried elsewhere.

There is no evidence to support the beliefs that moribund and changeless stinky footed bumpkins dragged tombs up ramps.

Nobody seems to have a problem with the mystery of why we see what we expect to see.

I can't recreate an entire thread in response to a single post.

The builders said numerous times that the PYRAMID WAS NOT A TOMB and they said many many dozens of times that the pyramid was the dead king himself. By this it is quite apparent that they meant the pyramid served as a mnemonic to remember the dead king by day. They also said that he was remembered by a star at night when the pyramid was invisible.

Akhification/ transmogrification was the process by which the dead king was changed into a living star and a living pyramid. This is quite clear if you believe the builders, the Pyramid Texts, and don't first assume they were superstitious. Egyptologists never did this. They knew their progeny was superstitious so they assumed the builders were as well. So now we've had 4,000 years of detour and science against religion.

 

[Thief]

In many different religions, languages and cultures. Everyone who recites I AM, in every culture and religion believes they have what is necessary to show for it.

think.....
God.....then creation

I AM!

 

[shunyadragon]

think.....
God.....then creation

I AM!

My thinking goes beyond any one set of scriptures, nor ancient world view, though I take them all in the context of the time they were revealed.

So!?!?!!? Does not address the question.

 

[Thief]

So!?!?!!? Does not address the question.

you mean to say....it does not give you a response you can use
to counter my post

 

[shunyadragon]

you mean to say....it does not give you a response you can use
to counter my post

No in context your posts, plural, were countered, because your posts are repetitive brief sound bites from a very narrow personal perspective.

 

[Thief]

No in context your posts, plural, were countered, because your posts are repetitive brief sound bites from a very narrow personal perspective.

no need to take my words personally

But I suspect God will do so

and any nay saying as well

 

[shunyadragon]

no need to take my words personally.

I do not take your words personally, but apparently you do.

But I suspect God will do so.

That is likely IF God exists God is likely not your God nor any other human image of God.

. . . and any nay saying as well

From your part also . . .

 

[Thief]

I do not take your words personally, but apparently you do.



That is likely IF God exists God is likely not your God nor any other human image of God.



From your part also . . .

you assume too much of me

 

[shunyadragon]

you assume too much of me

All I can go by is the content of your posts, and I assume nothing beyond that.

 

[Thief]

your posts are repetitive brief sound bites from a very narrow personal perspective.

I do not take your words personally, but apparently you do.

All I can go by is the content of your posts, and I assume nothing beyond that.

no really.....waaaaaaay too many assumptions on your part

and my perspective does not hold myself at center

when you say nay to me...….
I don't care

I have been speaking of Something Greater than myself

 

[shunyadragon]

no really.....waaaaaaay too many assumptions on your part.

Absolutely No assumptions, only based on your posts. Be specific as what assumptions you believe I am making.

. . . and my perspective does not hold myself at center.

Never claimed you did.

when you say nay to me...….
I don't care.

I do not say nay to you.

I have been speaking of Something Greater than myself

. . . but none the less you have referred firmly concerning your assertions of specific belief concerning what you describe as 'Something Greater than myself.'

You are still not responding coherently defending your own posts.

 

[Thief]

You are still not responding coherently defending your own posts.

this is not a word game

and I suspect.....you do understand my postwork

 

[shunyadragon]

this is not a word game

and I suspect.....you do understand my postwork

Yes I do understand! You are the one playing word games

Again . . . Absolutely No assumptions, only based on your posts. Be specific as what assumptions you believe I am making.

 

[Thief]

how about...…..?
I believe in science
and because I do

I believe in God

I believe in cause and effect

so.....I believe in God

Spirit first

 

[Phaedrus]

how about...…..?
I believe in science
and because I do

I believe in God

I believe in cause and effect

so.....I believe in God

Spirit first

I notice that you post a lot, but you don't actually say anything.

 

[Thief]

I notice that you post a lot, but you don't actually say anything.

sit still and think about it

 

[Valjean]

how about...…..?
I believe in science
and because I do

I believe in God

I believe in cause and effect

so.....I believe in God

Spirit first

Non sequitur

 

[tas8831]

There are many dozens of threads where I've clearly shown the pyramid is NOT A TOMB.

Yeah, sure... You've been making these grand claims for like at least 7 years - found your exact same posts on at least 3 different forums.Yet, all you ever present is your opinion.

Here is one where I show what the pyramid actually is in the builders' own words;

The King as Pyramid - Graham Hancock Official Website

Ah - crank conspiracy nut Hancock - the guy that claims south is "down".


No thanks.

 

[tas8831]

Haven't seen this debunking - citations/references please.

There's a great deal of illogic in the interpretation of the data and in our estimation of the ancients. These non-sequiturs are inconsistent with nature and the physical evidence.



I'm not sure which question you consider inadequately addressed. There is a huge amount of data that supports ....

I make a simple request:

"Haven't seen this debunking - citations/references please."

And I get paragraph after paragraph of innuendo, assertion, story-telling.

Not 1 citation.

Not 1 reference.

Just mountains of assertions.