leibowde84
Veteran Member
When did he claim that something was self evident?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Science, Metaphysics, and "God of the Gaps" Arguments
- Thread starter Gambit
- Start date
- Status
Thief
Rogue Theologian
stay with it.......keep focused
leibowde84
Veteran Member
Can you cite his comment where he claimed something was self-evident? I'm not seeing it.
McBell
Unbound
rotflmao
I have over 36,000 posts and not once have I made the claim that something is "self-evident".
Seems you really need to take a few moments and wash that egg off your face...
leibowde84
Veteran Member
or is this yet another cop out?
McBell
Unbound
put the mirror away...
Problem solved.
leibowde84
Veteran Member
You are refusing to answer our questions, then you try to personally insult us. So, you are the only one trolling. And your self-evident stuff is pretty laughable.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
your questions are less than well placed.....barely intelligent and only argumental...
I'm trying to be generous at this point
McBell
Unbound
an admission of trolling?
I mean, if you honestly thought the questions to be as unintelligent and argumentative as you claim, yet you still responded....
Makes a person wonder who it is you are trying to convince, everyone else or yourself?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Someone had to be first.....is a pivot point.
it's been ignored so far......
what do you think you are doing here?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
you too
leibowde84
Veteran Member
When have I ever insulted you personally?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
leibowde84
Veteran Member
This doesn't seem to make sense. Please rephrase.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
perhaps you should take a break and think about it
leibowde84
Veteran Member
That is merely an unsubstantiated claim. It is the same as me claiming that "someone didn't have to be first". Until you back up your claim that someone had to be first, there is nothing to rebut.
leibowde84
Veteran Member
I did. It is obviously incoherent.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Someone had to be first.....self evident
leibowde84
Veteran Member
Someone didn't have to be first ... Self evident.
See how that works? If you don't substantiate your claim at all, it is no more valid than any opposing claim. You have to back up your claim that "someone had to be first". Repeating it merely makes it look like you have no support for your claim and it is, in fact, fraudulent.
- Status