Scientific Evidence Supporting Intelligent Design

[Kilgore Trout]

They come up with any yet?

There's got to be something by now, right?

 

[linwood]

This is going to be a really really short thread

 

[Storm]

Do I hear crickets?

 

[invisible chzbrgr]

LOL linwood

:ignore: Intelligent Design is only a theory!*



*(it hopes to be one one day, though!)

 

[Nepenthe]

I read something about "bananas" in some scientific journal. I think it was peer reviewed in the Cameron-Comfort Journal of Pathetic Arguments For Design.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Hmmm, how disappointing, I was sure there would be something this time.

Oh well, guess I'll check back next year - Keep plugging away ID researchers!

 

[The Duke of Vandals]

Ever notice how theists will leap at any tiny bit of science that supports their views, yet do their best to tell us things like "science can't prove god"?

It's not unlike the Bush administration's 2002 policy towards WMD's in Iraq where any report that shows there may be WMD's is gospel and any report showing the truth, that there are no WMD's, was discarded as "wrong".

 

[painted wolf]

There have been a few half-hearted attempts... but mostly they are mucked up by the fact that they don't seem to understand scientific procedure.

I don't expect the big shots of ID to do any research in the area... As working scientists they know what will happen if they do. It's better to protect the cause than try to evidence it.

wa:do

 

[Jose Fly]

I read something about "bananas" in some scientific journal. I think it was peer reviewed in the Cameron-Comfort Journal of Pathetic Arguments For Design.

LOL! Frubals comin' your way!!!

 

[tumbleweed41]

:sleep:Just came by to check......nothing yet........

 

[Valjean]

Post this thread in a Christian chatroom and see what response you get.

 

[Jose Fly]

My guess is, you'll get a lot of "God of the Gaps" arguments, and arguments from personal incredulity....and maybe a bunch of links from the Disco Toot. ;-)

 

[Twilight Hue]

You would think a YEC would've showed up by now.

I'll put the kettle on.

 

[Yerda]

What what evidence for ID be likely to look like?

 

[Alceste]

The other day I bought a jar of peanut butter and there was no new life inside. If that doesn't convince you, I don't know what would.

 

[painted wolf]

Are you sure? Did you check it under a high powered microscope and genetic testing?

What if new life does show up in peanut butter, but it's so microscopic that no one ever notices?

wa:do

 

[angellous_evangellous]

What what evidence for ID be likely to look like?

 

[Alceste]

Are you sure? Did you check it under a high powered microscope and genetic testing?

What if new life does show up in peanut butter, but it's so microscopic that no one ever notices?

wa:do

Psh. If it's not visible to the naked eye and /or written in the Bible, it doesn't exist. Microscopism is an atheist conspiracy.

 

[angellous_evangellous]

Psh. If it's not visible to the naked eye and /or written in the Bible, it doesn't exist. Microscopism is an atheist conspiracy.

Yet the best atheist conspiracy of all is Angellous.

 

[rockondon]

if stuff is really complex then that proves stuff like Jonah living in a whale for 3 days and millons of animals can fit on the ark...right?