firedragon
Veteran Member
Verse 3:7 says some of its verses are mutishabihat (allegorical, unclear), and none knows their interpretation, except those who are well-grounded in knowledge. According to Quran and hadithes, Muhammad and His successors are well grounded in knowledge. How could God leave a people with a Book, but does not provide its interpretation? Thus, the hadithes of prophet and imams must have sufficient information to interpret Quran. We cannot understand quran without hadithes of the prophet and imams, because no body can claim they he is well grounded in knowledge, and knows its interpretations.
rejecting the hadithes of imams, which clearly say Qaim comes with a new book, and a new islam does not seem compatible with Islam, because these hadithes are compatible with Quran. Quran also confirms Torah being from God, and no where Quran says the Torah got corrupted. Peace.
Yes. We hear this quite often. But you reject the Quran. You put more value in the hadith. And you still have not given the source of the hadith even to explore. I ask because I dont know the source of the hadith you have provided. The book is written in 17th century or early 18th century. the prophet lived a millennium ago. So for a 1000 years where did the hadith exist? Thats my question. You have avoided that question many times.
So peace.