• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Seeing That Women Can Go Topless Now Do You Suppose A Lot More Rapes Will Happen?

What the thread title says


  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
Titanic13 cited an interview and yet you come out with "are you trying to say Henry Lee Lucas raped and murdered people because he had a high libido?" And then you had the audacity to tell him to "think a little deeper about what you are saying here". It's obvious to all English readers that he quoted a source, he wasn't the one making the actual claim. :facepalm:
Do you know how to follow a conversation? Titanic said he believes a minority of rapists rape with the motivation of satisfying their sexual urges. Then he used Henry Lee Lucas as proof that some rapists rape because they have high libidos.
So yes he did make the claim.
 

Titanic

Well-Known Member
Do you know how to follow a conversation? Titanic said he believes a minority of rapists rape with the motivation of satisfying their sexual urges. Then he used Henry Lee Lucas as proof that some rapists rape because they have high libidos.
So yes he did make the claim.

I got myself in a bind.
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
I believe he was lying. Back when I was a teen I believed it was true when I first heard about it. I have matured since then and I have changed my views. I guess I could be wrong and he really did tell the truth. Only he knows.
Ok I don't get you. First you are saying there is a minority of rapists who rape because of sexual urges due to the evidence you have read and used Henry Lee Lucas as an example...
and now you are saying he was probably lying?
So where is this minority that rapes due to sexual urges then?
 

ignition

Active Member
Do you know how to follow a conversation? Titanic said he believes a minority of rapists rape with the motivation of satisfying their sexual urges. Then he used Henry Lee Lucas as proof that some rapists rape because they have high libidos.
So yes he did make the claim.
No, the question is; do you know how to read?

Titanic13 said: "He actually said in a interview sex was always his biggest downfall and it was the reason he started his killing spree."

And then you came out with: "are you trying say Henry Lee Lucas raped and murdered people because he had a high libido?" I'll give you a clue. Answer: Yes, because apparently Henry himself said that.

And to make matters worse you said: "Can you just please think a little deeper about what you are saying here".

What does that even mean? Think a little deeper about what? You have a problem with somebody referring to an interview or something? :facepalm:
 

Titanic

Well-Known Member
Ok I don't get you. First you are saying there is a minority of rapists who rape because of sexual urges due to the evidence you have read and used Henry Lee Lucas as an example...
and now you are saying he was probably lying?
So where is this minority that rapes due to sexual urges then?

I do not know for sure if he was lying. He could have been telling the truth. Only Henry Lee Lucas knew. Albert De Salvo perhaps? or Ted Bundy?
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
No, the question is; do you know how to read?

Titanic13 said: "He actually said in a interview sex was always his biggest downfall and it was the reason he started his killing spree."

And then you came out with: "are you trying say Henry Lee Lucas raped and murdered people because he had a high libido?" I'll give you a clue. Answer: Yes, because apparently Henry himself said that.

And to make matters worse you said: "Can you just please think a little deeper about what you are saying here".

What does that even mean? Think a little deeper about what? You have a problem with somebody referring to an interview or something? :facepalm:
Yeah you have a problem with following a conversation
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
I do not know for sure if he was lying. He could have been telling the truth. Only Henry Lee Lucas knew. Albert De Salvo perhaps? or Ted Bundy?
Look at his back story he was abused by his mother as a child, but somehow a high libido has something to do with it?
Just face it no one is raping anybody because they have a high libido.
Ted Bundy said he hates women so how is that because of a high libido?
 

Titanic

Well-Known Member
Look at his back story he was abused by his mother as a child, but somehow a high libido has something to do with it?
Just face it no one is raping anybody because they have a high libido.
Ted Bundy said he hates women so how is that because of a high libido?

Ted Bundy did say violent porn made him rape and kill women. He was also not know as a fibber like Henry Lee Lucas was.
 

Titanic

Well-Known Member
So basically there is no minority that is raping people because they are horny and paying for sex in no way decreases rape.
Cheers
I'm glad we cleared that up.
P.s I'm not offended or angry at you.

Thanks for not being offended or angry at me. I guess that its for me on this thread. peace.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
I'm not even sure what the argument is anymore.

But I do think that its not even "high libido" but a guy that is horny might force sex on his GF or wife or date believing hes "entitled" /"owed" and she's not giving it.But that would have to start with some underlying belief again that women are on earth for his sexual gratification .So she's "cheating" him out of what belongs to him.Throw in if she acts flirty and or dresses in a manner he thinks she is trying to attract him then tells him NO?O.K then hes "angry" because she is deliberately teasing him.So he might "take what is his" and "teach her" who's the boss.Who's really "in control" and has the power".Even if a guy never resorts to rape...know how many times I've heard the following from married men??

Why is it up to HER if we have sex or not?

Yeah I got angry and frustrated over her constant "witholding of the "sex".(get that ?"the sex" his belonging).

Why should I even have to ask?

I think there is an "underlying" resentment that women even have the "power" of consent by certain men.So they feel controlled by her.Because she has what they "want" and they feel weak and vulnerable having to get her "permission" and then if she rejects him he feels humiliated.

"She controls "the sex".

"She uses sex as a weapon".(weapon being saying no).

That's only ONE angle. Feeling entitled and resentment .And yes to satisfy sexual urges not simply "hatred of women".

So from that one angle (in OUR society) I can imagine if suddenly women are bouncing around happily topless you might see more sexual assaults.As it is "cleavage" is taunting them.Unfortunately ...

We would have to wait about 100 years before it wouldn't give a guy another "excuse" to rape her.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Also as far as the "paying for sex" aspect"? Prostitutes are routinely raped.By Johns and Pimps.Its common.They in fact are more likely to be raped than a non prostitute.
 

DallasApple

Depends Upon My Mood..
Do you suppose more guys like a Ted Bundy or a Gary Ridgeway will be on the prowl?

Oh and Titanic LOL>>>as to answer this specific question not necessarily guys like that.I don't know about the second one but Ted Bundy was a sociopathic serial rapist.Who actually got turned on by a woman being terrified and he wasn't just a rapist he was a murderer.

Far more rapes occur just going on a date by someone who never raped before and may never again and no one is murdered either.
 

Kerr

Well-Known Member
I dont buy the idea that a high libado makes anyone a rapist. It may contribute in some cases, but in the end its their attitudes and values that allows them to do it.
 
Top