Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

[james blunt]

How did you verify this?

Hint: Guessing is not a valid answer.

Pause motion, time stops, no distinguishable change.

 

[Darkstorn]

Pause motion, time stops, no distinguishable change.

How did you verify this? I wasn't asking for more description of your idea of what's going to happen. I'm asking, how did you verify this?

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Here is a rough version View attachment 22389

Nope.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

How did you verify this? I wasn't asking for more description of your idea of what's going to happen. I'm asking, how did you verify this?

I dare you to try explaining Zeno's paradox and quantum packets to him.

 

[james blunt]

How did you verify this? I wasn't asking for more description of your idea of what's going to happen. I'm asking, how did you verify this?

Well, ''he'' told me this , ''he'' is wisdom and insight, ''he'' is intuitive, ''he'' is calculations and thoughts, ''he'' is critical thinking.

 

[Polymath257]

Without getting into philosophy, the universe is the observer.

No valid reference frame here.

 

[Darkstorn]

Well, ''he'' told me this , he is wisdom and insight, he is intuitive, he is calculations and thoughts, he is critical thinking.

Ah, so you're proselytizing. You might want to read the forum rules again. No, you cannot assert that as truth in these debate forums.

I literally can't tell that you're wrong there without making claims regarding your beliefs. So it has no place on a thread like this.

I dare you to try explaining Zeno's paradox and quantum packets to him.

I think we should first try to explain to him that the voices he hears might not be "god" or even "gods." They might in fact be a sign of delusion.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Well, ''he'' told me this , he is wisdom and insight, he is intuitive, he is calculations and thoughts, he is critical thinking.

Cool. Well that should be enough to dismantle a hundred years of multi disciplinary, evidence supported by multiple lines, theory. We'll just ring up CERN and tell them they're wrong because "Sustainer said God told him so" I'm sure they'll accept that without evidence.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

Ah, so you're proselytizing. You might want to read the forum rules again. No, you cannot assert that as truth in these debate forums.

I literally can't tell that you're wrong there without making claims regarding your beliefs. So it has no place on a thread like this.



I think we should first try to explain to him that the voices he hears might not be "god" or even "gods." They might in fact be a sign of delusion.

trying to explain to delusional people that they're delusional rarely works well. But hey, the real worry is if he DOES start to get this stuff, then someone gets to explain to him that not only does time slow as velocity increases, but mass increases too!

 

[james blunt]

I think we should first try to explain to him that the voices he hears might not be "god" or even "gods." They might in fact be a sign of delusion.

Hmmm, quite clearly you can't read English if you read that . For he is him who is not subjective and does not involve belief or personal feelings.

 

[Darkstorn]

Hmmm, quite clearly you can't read English if you read that . For he is him who is not subjective and does not involve belief or personal feelings.

Very convenient. You get to decide what's objective and what's not. You could just have started this thread with that and saved a bunch of people a lot of time.

I'm going to stick by my original claim. You are actually acting delusional now.

You can at the very least see that even if you were talking the truth, which is very unlikely, I can't see inside your brain to confirm this. I would need to trust your word.

I really don't think you understand objectivity.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

What if we considered the entire observable ''universe'' in being a single enormous photon? ( A light sphere)

What if we pretend that planets are pink unicorns? I don't see the point of fantastical scenarios.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

I understand what you guys have been saying. I'm just not sure I believe it is true, that light doesn't experience time or distance. But, if it is true, then I think the light has to go from origin to destination instantaneously no matter what the distance.

And if that is the case, then it can't be used in any way to verify age of the earth.

You are moving between frames of reference again. For any frame of reference (that is, for any object not moving at the speed of light) you will see that light takes time to move from one position in space to another. This is experimentally verifiable, and has been verified. Even the GPS you use for navigating around a city depends on the measured speed of light.

 

[james blunt]

What if we pretend that planets are pink unicorns? I don't see the point of fantastical scenarios.

There is no pretend to it , the observable Universe is a consequent of visible light points.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

There is no pretend to it , the observable Universe is a consequent of visible light points.

What's that got to do with the universe being a single photon?

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

If you understood it so well, why didn't you answer my questions when given the opportunity?

You have a habit of ignoring the answers or proclaiming the answers to be impossible for no apparent reason.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

There is no pretend to it , the observable Universe is a consequent of visible light points.

But the universe is not a light sphere, as you claimed.

 

[dfnj]

Another artwork thread. The author's intent is just to get people to post comments.

 

[james blunt]

But the universe is not a light sphere, as you claimed.

You really need to understand the concept of things that are invisible. It is an invisible light sphere, highlighted by substance interaction .

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

You really need to understand the concept of things that are invisible. It is an invisible light sphere, highlighted by substance interaction .

That is made up, not invisible. There's a difference.