Seeing things in their past? You are full of beans!

[Thermos aquaticus]

Misrepresented by the wrong wording causing confusion for the person learning the subject. You ever wondered why people disagree with you?

I don't wonder why you disagree with me. You refuse to accept reality. You think making up words somehow changes reality.

 

[james blunt]

It is time itself that runs at a different speed as shown by every single experiment that has tested the idea. We can even see supernovae that move in slow motion for high red shift type Ia supernovae:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.3595.pdf

No, it is the caesium frequency that slows down. Are you trying to absurdly claim the caesium is time itself?
A measurement is a measurement , you are practically trying to say that 30 mph is a car.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

No, it is the caesium frequency that slows down.

The caesium frequency does not slow down for observers in the same reference frame as the atomic clocks.

Are you trying to absurdly claim the caesium is time itself?

You are absurdly claiming that caesium frequencies change when we put them on airplanes, for no apparent reason. What mechanism would cause these frequencies to change? We use them to measure time for a reason: they are a physical constant.

 

[james blunt]

The caesium frequency does not slow down for observers in the same reference frame as the atomic clocks.



You are absurdly claiming that caesium frequencies change when we put them on airplanes, for no apparent reason. What mechanism would cause these frequencies to change? We use them to measure time for a reason: they are a physical constant.

Oh boy , why don't you go learn some physics?

Doppler affect, due to direction . West to East is travelling into the Sun and vice versus .

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

Oh boy , why don't you go learn some physics?

Doppler affect, due to direction . West to East is travelling into the Sun and vice versus .

The Doppler effect doesn't apply to the vibrations of a caesium atom. Please learn some physics.

 

[james blunt]

The Doppler effect doesn't apply to the vibrations of a caesium atom. Please learn some physics.

A change in entropy by spacial field directional interference is .
That may be beyond your comprehension, I tried the simple version.

 

[james blunt]

Δ S = Δ f where S is entropy and f is frequency and Δ is change.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

A change in entropy by spacial field directional interference is .
That may be beyond your comprehension, I tried the simple version.

It isn't beyond my comprehension. It is just made up. It isn't supported by a shred of evidence.

 

[james blunt]

It isn't beyond my comprehension. It is just made up. It isn't supported by a shred of evidence.

I have demonstrated it in maths and I have provided a model falsifying the twin paradox. I have supported it.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

I have demonstrated it in maths and I have provided a model falsifying the twin paradox. I have supported it.

What maths?

 

[Polymath257]

Δ S = Δ f where S is entropy and f is frequency and Δ is change.

Not even close to the same *type* of objects on each side. The left hand side has entropy, which is J/K and the right hand side has frequency, which is 1/s.

And you are saying someone else has to learn some physics???

 

[Polymath257]

What maths?

he thinks post #967 made sense and answered your objections.

 

[james blunt]

What maths?

The simple change of entropy equals to a change of frequency formula.

 

[james blunt]

he thinks post #967 made sense and answered your objections.

It did , don't you know maths formula?

It is simple , I defined the parameters.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

he thinks post #967 made sense and answered your objections.

Hehehe, that's hilarious. It's cracks me up when people think they can change reality by writing a math equation.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

The simple change of entropy equals to a change of frequency formula.

Based on what evidence? Where are the experiments showing this relationship?

 

[Polymath257]

It did , don't you know maths formula?

It is simple , I defined the parameters.

Yes, I know math. I also know physics. And chemistry. And biology.

What you wrote isn't worth the electrons it was transmitted by.

 

[james blunt]

Not even close to the same *type* of objects on each side. The left hand side has entropy, which is J/K and the right hand side has frequency, which is 1/s.

And you are saying someone else has to learn some physics???

What ? can't you read ? Honestly you are being really obtuse if you cannot read that .

Entropy can change in many ways the same as frequency can change in many ways proportional to the change of entropy.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

What ? can't you read ? Honestly you are being really obtuse if you cannot read that .

Entropy can change in many ways the same as frequency can change in many ways proportional to the change of entropy.

Again, where are the experiments?

 

[Polymath257]

Hehehe, that's hilarious. It's cracks me up when people think they can change reality by writing a math equation.

Especially a math equation whose units are not in agreement. But then, he thinks light years are not a measure of distance, so what do you expect?