The young'ns who are so easily offended might simply
be so annoyingly noticeable that they appear to be
more representative than they really are.
be so annoyingly noticeable that they appear to be
more representative than they really are.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, even then, at least among the people I know and the general public, most people took it in stride. At least during my own lifetime, I've seen plenty of tantrums by people of all ages. These things happen, but most people have far more important things to worry about, such as the struggle to survive, pay bills, feed their families. Many people just don't have the time or energy to throw a tantrum - or worry about the tantrums of others.
Well, we're all human beings with many of the same faults and shortcomings. One can discern the same kind of generation gaps which existed in every era. Most of the time, it just seems tongue-in-cheek, light-hearted ribbing each other. But there are times when it comes across more serious.
SadnessYes, I think we have. We've wavered and lost our way. This is just as true for the Boomers as much as anyone.
I agree. But the news thinks I should care lol. I will admit that I derived a certain amount of
schadenfreude from watching the very people who spent years complaining about “snowflakes” become nothing more than, well, snowflakes. I realise it’s the bizarre fringe rather than an accurate representation of people. But I couldn’t help but notice all of them came from generations older than mine.
I find it to be just a perpetual cyclic thing, doomed to repeat itself. Like I dunno boy bands or something.
Sadness
I think the right-wing has some younger supporters, although I have no idea what the numbers might be. One of the more noticeable figures in the Capitol riots (the guy wearing the Viking helmet and furs) was in his 30s - not exactly a Boomer. I guess he would be a Millennial.
Yes. As they say, the more things change, the more they stay the same. When I was growing up, one of my favorite bands was The Who, who had a song called "My Generation" where there's the line "Hope I die before I get old." When the Boomers were in their teens and twenties, they said "Don't trust anyone over 30." Of course, during the Cold War and the threat of nuclear war, a lot of young people wondered if they'd even be alive by age 30. I'm not sure that today's younger generations really have that fear to contend with, or at least, they don't seem to think about it much.
True.One thing is certain: Time always marches on, and the younger generations will themselves grow older - and they'll probably look with disapproval on the generations that come after them. The cycle will continue, generation after generation.
Oh yeah there are definitely young conservatives. I was talking more about the “demagogues” I guess you’d call them. Most are at least Gen X if not older Millenials. Except for like I dunno that John Doyle guy.
Who is ironically mocked by the lefties I hang with as too young.
I guess I was using “boomer” more in the colloquial sense. Like an older person who is conservative, not necessarily an actual baby boomer.
Q Anon Shaman guy or Viking Helmet guy is umm, how’s he doing? Is...he okay?
There was recently some sort of (obviously sensationalist) “expose” of the Q-cult and its impact over here on our version of 60 minutes. Which is just wild to me because it’s such an American phenomenon in my head. But I suppose the wide reaching influence of the internet and all that.
Hmm well I think there was definite doom and gloom in the 90s with the scare of “global warming.” It was a threat that was sort of abstract but sort of apocalyptic. But I don’t think it went as far as thinking we’d be dead by age 30. It was more, wow our planet is probably gonna die.
That’s as close as my Gen got, I think. Don’t know about zoomers though. They might be more existential or less in their own generational crises. I dunno
True.
No doubts. I keep forgetting you're my dad's age.I'm technically a Boomer myself (born in '63), although those in Generation X were 1965 and after, so I probably identify more with that generation than the Boomers.
No doubts. I keep forgetting you're my dad's age.
But it's all whack anyways. I haven't argued against being Gen X, but millennial the biggest problem with that is I'm part of a group who had been at work long enough when the Recession hit we either got ahead or were basically unphased by the Recession. And, let's be honest, if someone born in '81 waited until around '08 to enter the workforce, there are some very serious problems there. And when I graduated we didn't yet have our first cell phone, we didn't have anything like Facebook, and we were crap at web searches (we had a younger teacher who amazed us at how he was able to find anything on the internet).
Terrorism and Iraq is another issue. We remember the Oklahoma City bombing, some of us even when Theodore Kaczynski resurfaced, and we remember Bush Sr. going to Iraq. Millennials are defines as 9/11 being their first dealings with national terrorism and the War Against Terror being their first thingy with Iraq. My friends and I, however, were discussing Bush Jr.'s invasion and thought it would be more like his dad's.
I'm sure there are in betweeners from Boomers to Gen X who sway more towards one or the other (my dad is more of Boomer). We just didn't have technology and then a Recession to help highlight the differences.
I don't think that the younger generations (those under 30) are more sensitive, I think that our generation (all the people living now) are more sensitive.Are those of younger generations too sensitive? Why or why not? Tagging as promised @Saint Frankenstein and @Israel Khan
By younger generations I mean born after 1997...yes I know that would include me. I meant younger as in compared to older generations not compared to my age.
I guess that could be said for liberals, too. After all, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton aren't exactly spring chickens. Even Obama was at the younger end of the Boomer generation. I'm technically a Boomer myself (born in '63), although those in Generation X were 1965 and after, so I probably identify more with that generation than the Boomers.
I have no idea. As far as I know, he's still in jail. I read somewhere recently that he claimed that his religious beliefs require him to eat organic food, so the jail accommodated his request and started giving him organic food.
The internet seems to have a plethora of various of echo chambers.
Interesting. I guess thanks to media/movies/tv I always assumed the 60s were full of hippies and social upheaval. But that might not be entirely accurate. Also what is NIMBY?I think the Boomers were also concerned about global warming and the environment in general. Most of the problems we're dealing with now - people knew about back then. I'm not sure what happened or what caused the change. Americans seemed become more self-centered, losing the sense of "social consciousness" they once had. There were more and more NIMBYs who became more materialistic and consumerist - more "plastic," which was once a term of derision. We also seemed to become more escapist. In the post-Vietnam, post-Watergate era, we didn't want realism anymore. People had grown weary of politics and "issues" - they wanted Star Wars and fantasy. They wanted Reagan.
Are those of younger generations too sensitive? Why or why not? Tagging as promised @Saint Frankenstein and @Israel Khan
By younger generations I mean born after 1997...yes I know that would include me. I meant younger as in compared to older generations not compared to my age.
I don't think the younger generation is any more sensitive than those who came before them. They might be qualified as more sensitive about certain subjects and behavior, but less about others.
You want to talk sensitivity?
How about when all the boomers and Gen Xers whine constantly about PC this and PC that? I have been watching (against my better judgement) the right wing cope on YouTube, as it’s called. My god what a bunch of sensitive snowflakes. And they’re all like 10 years older than I am.
(Please note I recognise that that will just be a concentrated minority. They don’t speak for their entire “side” or generation. I’m just saying, after the literal televised tantrum I saw American boomers have a couple months ago, which actually lasted like weeks, it’s a little rich to me to claim that Zoomers are the sensitive ones.)
Yes thank you!!! People complaining about “cancel culture” these days. I’m just like.....umm this has always been a thing, though???Like the 1950's and the Comics Code. They got rid of super hero comics mostly and replaced them with Barbie and Cowboy comics because they thought the other comics were immoral and corrupting the children.
Yes thank you!!! People complaining about “cancel culture” these days. I’m just like.....umm this has always been a thing, though???
Because they will always lose the so called “culture war” every time, imho. Because society always moves forward.The old timers were cancelling comics, Heavy Metal, anything they considered immoral and unchristian.
Here is a good example:
(37) Marilyn Manson Interview - Phil Donahue Show - 1995 HD REMASTERED (By me) - YouTube
Thanks for bringing up your point. For some reason I completely forgot how older generations literally cancelled non conservative media. I dunno why.
Because they will always lose the so called “culture war” every time, imho. Because society always moves forward.
(I have nothing against conservative beliefs, just for the record.)
Huh, it’s like Yin and YangIt seems like the conservatives and progressives exist for essential reasons. Progressives make society move forward but conservatives exist to make sure that the don't stray too far.