I think that research I just made up indicates that 99% of people could not maintain strict abstinence for numerous reasons. The study also found that the other one percent were liars.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sex strike
- Thread starter Enoch07
- Start date
Meh your opinion will change on that after you've been married for over 5 years. Sex becomes less and less important as a relationship matures.
Hey oral, mutual, are fine alternatives if you can't resist the need for the release.
Hey sterilization is fine. That's your choice.
I just celebrated my 8th anniversary. Sex is just as important as it has ever been. If it isn't for you, I have to admit I feel sorry for you and your spouse.
I'm not demanding anything.
Alyssa Milano is but meh.
I just think she inadvertently made a good point is all. And I fully support her sex strike. You should be proud of me, I'm openly supporting a well known feminist!
As is sex with birth control, potentially backed up by abortion if the BC fails.
Ok try 20 years then, it doesn't matter. It's only a matter of time.
Have you ever read Lysistrata? Sex strikes have been failing for thousands of years.
And to get to that point, I suspect a fair amount of sex is done to make that bond.
Yeah, but you're not killing anyone with oral or mutual.
And I am not killing *anyone* with abortion either.
Let me be clear, I have reservations about late-term abortion. I feel that abortions should be done as early as possible. I don't have any problem up to about the 4th month.
After that, I do think there is a moral issue, but the right of a woman to have control of her own body still takes precedence. She, at the very least, has the right to have *anyone* who has taken over her body removed. Period. So, even if I agree that a fetus deserves the same rights as a newborn (which I don't think), I still think that abortion is a necessary fallback for some people.
If the relationship is healthy, 20 years is not some sort of automatic embargo period for sex.
Killing someone? What kind of sex are you talking about? Are you bragging or is this a Henry Lee Lucas confessional?Yeah, but you're not killing anyone with oral or mutual.
Oh. I see. Abortion. Of course. His post was just worded poorly.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
As far as "morality" and "purity" goes, anyone who believes that anal is a loophole needs to drop the pretense. It's still ****ing.
That is the painful reality of it.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Next time use adequate lube.
Last edited:
Once again, the point is to get a conversation going. As a liberal man, I have taken responsibility and insured I can't get someone pregnant. I've also committed to not having sex with pro-lifers (even if there isn't a possibility of pregnancy).
I agree, like if the Mother and Childs life is both in immediate danger, or rape/incest/molestation cases, etc.
What I don't believe is this notion that people cannot control themselves and have to have sex. It's a ridiculous and dangerous idea. If that was really the case rape would not be a thing.
People can control their sexual desires they just refuse to.