• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sexuality and Choice...

Kerr

Well-Known Member
They are free to marry any member of the opposite sex they choose, just like heterosexual couples.
Marriage without love is meaningless.

There are no privileges lost, they just don't get the same privileges because they wish to behave in a way that is contrary to why the extra privileges of marriage were given in the first place.
Then the system need to be changed, so that love is the most important aspect of it. And when love is, the kind of system you talk about only appear insane.
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
Only thing is that it does not damage the society nearly as much as the alternative, namely intolerance against what is different. Homophobia in this case. And does it matter if it is abnomal at all? I mean, if suddenly 99% of all hetrosexual men would become rapists, not being a rapist would be abnormal, still it would be the rapists that would have to be dealt with.
I never equated homosexual behavior to rape.
Abnormality (behavior) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
Marriage without love is meaningless.
Yes it is meaningless without Love

Then the system need to be changed, so that love is the most important aspect of it. And when love is, the kind of system you talk about only appear insane.
Are you asserting that homosexuals do not have the capacity to love a member of the opposite sex?
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
How about if i quote to you the entirety of the CIA statements.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2127rank.html

I don't care what your proposal is, the CIA World Fact-book trumps your ridiculous ideas.

do some research.... you'll find your ONE web source is poor at best and if you actually read it, is slanted to give a misinformed view...but there

The term world population commonly refers to the total number of living humans on Earth at a given time. As of 30 October 2009, the Earth's population is estimated by the United States Census Bureau to be 6.794 billion.[1] The world population has been growing continuously since the end of the Black Death around 1400.[2] There were also short term falls at other times due to plague, for example in the mid 17th century (see graph). The fastest rates of world population growth (above 1.8%) were seen briefly during the 1950s then for a longer period during the 1960s and 1970s (see graph). According to population projections, world population will continue to grow until around 2050. The 2008 rate of growth has almost halved since its peak of 2.2% per year, which was reached in 1963. World births have levelled off at about 134 million per year, since their peak at 163-million in the late 1990s, and are expected to remain constant. However, deaths are only around 57 million per year, and are expected to increase to 90 million by the year 2050. Because births outnumber deaths, the world's population is expected to reach about 9 billion by the year 2040


Whehter you are right or wrong on this issue, is rather irrelivant...
You are still denying people legal rights, because of what they do with their genitals
That is the bottom line:help:
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
so if two commited SAME sex couple want ot marry its tough baloney burgers...?
they can live together, cohabit, whatever you want to call it but that does not require us to provide them with privileges that were put in place as an investment in the future of the nation.

Same sex couples are denied basic human rights such as hospital visits and recognition after a partner dies.... not to mention tax benefits....

But really I am sure you are totally ignorant on these matters
The Hospital visitation rules are the ones that need changed, not marriage laws. Tax breaks were given to raise families as an investment int he future of the nation. It is quite simple really. Reproduction means more taxpayers and more work force, more GDP, more ideas ect... those ideas are not represented with homosexual couples.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
Reproduction means more taxpayers and more work force, more GDP, more ideas ect... those ideas are not represented with homosexual couples.


You are aware that american school children spend less time (hours) being educated than any other children in an industrialised nation on the planet?

I see your arguments are froma social darwinism stance....

thank gawd some people think there's more to life than breeding and making money...



Jesus really, simply isnt a part of your ethos is he....:facepalm:

"And Lo, Jesus said, go forth and breed so we can have a bigger GDP"
:foot:
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
You are aware that american school children spend less time (hours) being educated than any other children in an industrialised nation on the planet?

I see your arguments are froma social darwinism stance....

thank gawd some people think there's more to life than breeding and making money...

Jesus really, simply isnt a part of your ethos is he....:facepalm:

"And Lo, Jesus said, go forth and breed so we can have a bigger GDP"
:foot:
The reasons law makers put these privileges into place were the reasons i stated.

I know there are tons of other things associate with Life.
However, on this particular subject since you reject religious beliefs and morality claims by claiming "God made them this way, it's in their genes!" I am taking a different approach to show you that homosexual behavior is unnatural, flawed, and/or defective by your own logic.

If you wish to bring emotions and morality claims to the debate you cannot object to the other side doing the same or you make yourself a hypocrite.
 

Kerr

Well-Known Member
Love is love. you may claim there are different "kinds" of love, But that is false.

Sexual urges are separate and are controlled by different sections of the brain.
No, there are many forms of love. I do not love my brother as I loved my ex when we where together, I do not love my parents as I love my brother, I do not love my future girlfriend the same way as I would love my future children. I love my friends in another way then I love someone I am in a relationship. Yes, there are MANY forms of love, and that is the truth.
 

Kerr

Well-Known Member
I know there are tons of other things associate with Life.
However, on this particular subject since you reject religious beliefs and morality claims by claiming "God made them this way, it's in their genes!" I am taking a different approach to show you that homosexual behavior is unnatural, flawed, and/or defective by your own logic.
Something that you have failed at. Homosexuality does not harm society, it does not cost more, it is no threat to humanity what so ever. What does all that is intolerance. When people are beaten up and murdered because of their sexual preferences it is plain stupidity to claim that the sexual preference is the issue.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
The reasons law makes put them into place were these reasons.

I know there are tons of other things associate with Life.
However, on this particular subject since you reject religious beliefs and morality claims by claiming "God made them this way, it's in their genes!" I am taking a different approach to show you that homosexual behavior is unnatural, flawed, and/or defective by your own logic.

If you wish to bring emotions and morality claims to the debate you cannot object to the other side doing the same or you are a hypocrite.

Actually

The American laws were made to prevent religion encroaching on human rights

America has a concept, seperation of church and state

Law makers were actually RUNNING screaming from fundamnetalist views that wanted a theocracy...views such as YOURS

I reject bigotry

which is why IO mentioned rights,

how women were only recently allowed to vote
how black americans were only recently allowed in "white schools"
how asian americans were even considered homosapiens

Your arguemnts amount to the same thing

But then the Mormon church has been bigoted for a long time....
so I guess I should not be surprised

:facepalm:
If you want to change reality we can discuss bugs bunny if you prefer

Bugs-Bunny-Neener.jpg
 

madhatter85

Transhumanist
Homosexuality does not harm society, it does not cost more, it is no threat to humanity what so ever. What does all that is intolerance. When people are beaten up and murdered because of their sexual preferences it is plain stupidity to claim that the sexual preference is the issue.
to your bolded underlined statement, homosexuality itself may not cost more, but your insistence on trying to force people to accept it as "normal" cost hundreds of millions, even billions. Everything was great until you convinced yourselves homosexual behavior is normal.
Proposition 8 - Tracking the money -- latimes.com
 

Kerr

Well-Known Member
to your bolded underlined statement, homosexuality itself may not cost more, but your insistence on trying to force people to accept it as "normal" cost hundreds of millions, even billions. Everything was great until you convinced yourselves homosexual behavior is normal.
Proposition 8 - Tracking the money -- latimes.com
Same could be said about racism, but we only see racists whining about it. Truth is that if you want to change something it is going to cost. Does that mean we should never try and change anything for the better? Absolutely not.
 
Top