Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have a question for my fellow Shaktas about Durga's Umbrella. Often she is depicted with an umbrella or other canopy over her head in temples. Why is it that she is depicted this way but other Goddesses are not? I know all murtis get an umbrella when they paraded for special celebrations, but Durga Maa seems to be the only one who has one all the time. What is it's significance to her? Perhaps it's meaningless and just an affect of tradition but if there is a reason behind it I'm curious to know.
I think the canopy (chhatra) is there is case of all the deities. It is gifted by the devotees to honor them. So, a temple may have many 'chhatras' - small ones made of gold and larger many made of silver. Even in private shrines, people will buy 'chhatras' for their 'ishata' if they strike their fancy. Our family shrine had a small gold 'chhatra', in addition to the regular silver 'chhatra', which has gone to the person who bought our ancestral home - for free (his parents worshiped our shrine for 40 years and were loath to part with it. We accepted their request. Now we have only a photograph of that shrine to remember. All things change and one should not rue changes). Gold and silver prices have gone up recently, so will not buy any in near future.I have a question for my fellow Shaktas about Durga's Umbrella. Often she is depicted with an umbrella or other canopy over her head in temples. Why is it that she is depicted this way but other Goddesses are not? I know all murtis get an umbrella when they paraded for special celebrations, but Durga Maa seems to be the only one who has one all the time. What is it's significance to her? Perhaps it's meaningless and just an affect of tradition but if there is a reason behind it I'm curious to know.
I have a question for my fellow Shaktas about Durga's Umbrella. Often she is depicted with an umbrella or other canopy over her head in temples. Why is it that she is depicted this way but other Goddesses are not? I know all murtis get an umbrella when they paraded for special celebrations, but Durga Maa seems to be the only one who has one all the time. What is it's significance to her? Perhaps it's meaningless and just an affect of tradition but if there is a reason behind it I'm curious to know.
We must not forget that if Kali Maa is our mother, she is mother to others too (does not matter if they do not know or accept it).
Why is it so hard to find Shakta (Sri Vidya) teachers or organizations where gaining boons isn't the primary goal?
I mean, I guess I understand that is a part of Shaktism (and is where the stereotype comes from), but I'm pretty sure there a plenty of Shaktas where devotion and self-realization are the goals of this life.
What boons a Shakta will like to have? He has all that he requires in the mother. Worship of the Mother is the primary goal of a Shata (more like worship of Krishna among Hare-Krishnas).Why is it so hard to find Shakta (Sri Vidya) teachers or organizations where gaining boons isn't the primary goal?
What boons a Shakta will like to have? He has all that he requires in the mother. Worship of the Mother is the primary goal of a Shata (more like worship of Krishna among Hare-Krishnas).
IMHO, there are more Shaktas than Vaishnavas and Shaivas. Take for example the women. So, half the population is Shakta that way. Those who equally worship all deities, the Smartas, add them to the Shaktas, and then there are male Shaktas. Take for example Bengal, Tamilnadu, Gujarat. Yes, they may not be vocal, but do they need to be?
Why is it so hard to find Shakta (Sri Vidya) teachers or organizations where gaining boons isn't the primary goal?
I mean, I guess I understand that is a part of Shaktism (and is where the stereotype comes from), but I'm pretty sure there a plenty of Shaktas where devotion and self-realization are the goals of this life.
Of the 13 temples we visited in Vancouver, 3 were Shakta, a Thurga (South Indian spelling) a Durga, and a Mahalakshmi. Most were Sanatan I think, although its hard to tell some days. Two were Saiva, and one pure Vaishnava.I mean those outside India being more vocal. When I visited India last year the Mother was everywhere I looked! =) She is an integral part there and people know her significance. (Though of course society does not always reflect that reverence) But in the US, people don't consider Goddess worship "Real". So it ends up being practiced in isolation, out of the public eye and often times it's easy for people to take erroneous information about the Goddess to heart and then there's confusion about Shakta worship, vs. let's say, Wiccan or Neo-Goddess worship.
JMD, It also has to do with Hindu psyche. If their 'ishta' is honored, they do not mind the presence of other deities. It is not that they do not respect them. This happens only in some sects. Yes, I would also have liked to go to the Hinglaj Mata shrine being from Rajasthan (which borders Sindh), but my travelling days are over, and then the Pakistan-India relations.The other issue is that many mandirs in the US needs must cater to a wide spectrum, the number of local Hindus being small and across the board regarding Smarta, Vaisnava, Saiva, etc.
On another note, one place I would love to visit in person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinglaj_Mata.
JMD, It also has to do with Hindu psyche. If their 'ishta' is honored, they do not mind the presence of other deities..
Most Hindu Native kings (Rajputs, warrior clans) were Shaktas. Most City Goddesses in Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh are various forms of the Mother Goddess. Jodhpur, Bikaner and Jaipur had Mother Goddesses (Chamunda, Karni and Shila Devi). People in that city have a reverence for the royal deity.... and then there are male Shaktas.
It may not look like that the temple has given importance to the Mother Goddess, but no one will try to miss her. The temple in our neighborhood is one such. But everyone makes it a point to go to her shrine. And then, her presence is everywhere - as Parvati with Shiva, as Lakshmi with Vishnu, as Sita with Rama and as Radha with Krishna. She is an inseparable part of them. Can you imagine them without Shakti?Sometimes though, Mata ji's presence in a temple feels like an afterthought. It's hard to feel her energy in a place where she is rarely celebrated specifically.