Wut?
@SoyLeche looks like a bear to you? That's who I was quoting.
He looks more like me, to me. Based on his avatar.
When you start referring to me as a Bible tote'n fundie I know you've given up.
Tom
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
She's Baaaaaaaack....Or Is She?
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
@SoyLeche looks like a bear to you? That's who I was quoting.
He looks more like me, to me. Based on his avatar.
When you start referring to me as a Bible tote'n fundie I know you've given up.
Tom
Compared to me, you're the creationist (the term you brought up).
Wait a darned minute.
From your belief, indistinguishable from Scripture, that human beings don't matter until they draw breath to your belief that Trump is president regardless of the American people voting, indistinguishable from the Divine Right of Kings, you look like the creationist to me.
I believe in biological science and democracy. You don't.
Tom
Keep our roles straight.....I'm the atheist, you're the believer.
Don't try sucking up to me now.
I'm kinda in the mood to earn an infraction point.
Tom
I think you're safe so long as you're currying
Digital's favor with anti-business rhetoric.
But I've been tweaking the wrong noses.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
I was referring to a mountain of BS.
Humor should not require an explanation.
Also, those in glass houses shouldn't be slinging feces....or consuming them.
Last edited:
I'm not anti-business.
I'm anti-corruption. Like when huge corporations buy government officials.
Here, follow the money.
Eli Lilly produces anxiety drugs and sells them for 1000× what they cost to produce.
Eli Lilly then invests a fraction of the profits in "tough on crime" politicians who then invest in high performance policing that results in people incarcerated in private prisons.
And then the investors in the private prisons give kick backs to the judges who send the most people to jail. Heck, nothing illegal about a judge investing in a for-profit prison. They'd never even have to admit to doing so if they set up their financial records as well as Trump set up his before running for office.
Tom
And then people like you vote for tough-on-crime politicians.
I assume you're pulling Clinton out of your *** again?
I know what actually happened back in the 90s concerning "superpredators".
But I'm not even sure what your talking about, you're just dodging and flailing incomprehensibly.
Tom
Ya know what's one of the things I despise the most about Trump?
That the Democratic party will have to join his race to the bottom.
They'll have to get even better at lying and cheating and treason and media manipulation to have a chance in this election. And I already despise them, as a group. But they have to get even worse or Trump will outgame them again!
Tom
That the Democratic party will have to join his race to the bottom.
They'll have to get even better at lying and cheating and treason and media manipulation to have a chance in this election. And I already despise them, as a group. But they have to get even worse or Trump will outgame them again!
Tom
Wu Wei
ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
There was actually a discussion on NPR, I cannot find and I cannot give source, other that NPR. Where th statement was made that the Democratic party did not quite understand. It was not so much that everyone liked Trump more, it was they liked Hillary less. This was based on statistics not the votes themselves. I am neither Democrat or Republican so party affiliations mean nothing to me. I just found it interesting. There was also one that discussed how the Republican candidates missed the boat too. They kept trying to play up how they were of the Republican establishment and Trump was not, he was an outsider, therefore they should get the nomination not this outsider. They did not quite get that many Americans were fed up with the Republican establishment/insiders, or any political establishment in general and Trump was not part of any political establishment and therefore we got Trump
Wu Wei
ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Deplorables....really...... why, because I don't agree with Democrat OR Republican...because I am not a rabid fan of Hillary or Trump....because I am cable of coming up with my own views and not letting some political party tell me how I should think......frankly the problem in Government at the moment is both parties do not see beyond their party affiliation and don't give a hoot about the country or the people in it beyond a vote... Kind of agreeing with George Washington who is being proven correct, based on the goings on in DC today. Political parties are a bad thing because those in them will vote for what's best for the party over what is best for the country...if that's what makes me deplorable...well then I guess I am....r
Ummmm...
Perhaps you could learn to type with claws better?
You don't sound very different from me. I certainly didn't refer to you as part of the Basket of Deplorables, that was @Revoltingest. He proudly claimed the label, he put it on his RF description.
Until, IIRC, Trump dumped the peace treaty with Iran. Then Rev didn't feel so Deplorable.
I could be wrong.
What did I say that gave you to think I was referring to you?
Tom
ETA ~ Oh wait.
I think I understand now.
You've got @SoyLeche on <ignore>. So you posted something even more stupid than anything he ever considered posting.
Is that right?
I'm asking.
~
Last edited:
That post (not entirely serious) was about playing your game.
You're my special friend.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
I was just observing them this time.
Popular vote was meaningless. We’ve been down this road before.The fact remains, Clinton was the American electorate's top choice in 2016.
And that was despite the fact that "Sanders the spoiler" gave zillions of people an excuse to stay home and assume that Clinton was going to rescue the USA from Trump. Because that's what all the polls indicated.
I don't think that will be the case in 2020.
Tom
If "observing" means consuming & upchucking'm.
You worked tirelessly & in concert with your ilk to shift
the thread to Drudge instead of Bloomberg & Clinton.
Your crew's deflection & denial are legendary on RF.
Last edited: