I just went back many posts, following the links.
It looks to me like you imagined the fecal thing.
Not that I'm asking why or anything. I don't want to know.
Jus' sayin'
Tom
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
She's Baaaaaaaack....Or Is She?
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
It looks to me like you imagined the fecal thing.
Not that I'm asking why or anything. I don't want to know.
Jus' sayin'
Tom
I thought you'd recognize the plural, &Huh? The last thing I remember saying is if there’s anything else about a BB-Hillary ticket I haven’t addressed, let me know, and I made a reference to a sundae. Now you’re babbling about me making things sexual and fecal (!)
Im just going to smile and back away slowly.
understand that I referred to your tribe.
Some of us are better readers.
Perhaps your home schooling was lacking.
Is Bloomberg's campaign focus moving from Trump to Democratic rivals?
In the news....
Bloomberg Takes on Sanders in New Ad Targeting His Supporters: 'Really?' (Video)
Sanders and Bloomberg exchange blows as Democratic race heats up
It seems he's really intent on winning the nomination.
In the news....
Bloomberg Takes on Sanders in New Ad Targeting His Supporters: 'Really?' (Video)
Sanders and Bloomberg exchange blows as Democratic race heats up
It seems he's really intent on winning the nomination.
Last edited:
Given the mess that is the current DNC, it really wouldn't surprise me if this was a surreptitious trial balloon being floated to see the general reaction.
Honestly, I do think the Bloomberg/Clinton combination has more going for it than most of the other options.
Tom
Wait....of all people on RF, you are the one taking this with a grain of seriousness.
I begin to suspect that you're not 100% a Bart Simpsonesque irascible scamp.
Uh oh....I now feel obliged to warn you about the Saran Wrap on the toilet seats
in the staff lavatories. (But don't alert the other staffers.)
More news (doomed to be branded as "fake" by the usual suspects)....
Michael Bloomberg Surges in Poll and Qualifies for Democratic Debate in Las Vegas
Yep.
I definitely see advantage in the combination of politically experienced billionaire and one of the most fearsome predators in the DC swamp.
Tom
I'm not.
I'm more like a cynical believer in realpolitik.
I don't want the powers of good to let the perfect become the enemy of the good,
Again.
I don't want a fluffy bunny of Self-righteouness and bipartisanship to get run over by The Swamp, like Carter and Obama did.
I want someone in the White House who is as mean and unprincipled as Trump, as willing to lie and steal to get what they want, but less beholden to foreign governments and the investment class.
So far, that looks like Bloomberg-Clinton.
Tom
The whispers of Hillary Clinton 2024 have started - CNNPolitics
Excerpted...
In the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court's monumental decision to overturn Roe v Wade, conservative writer John Ellis took to the internet to make a provocative case: It was time for Hillary Clinton to make a(nother) political comeback.
"Now is her moment," he wrote. "The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade creates the opening for Hillary Clinton to get out of stealth mode and start down the path toward declaring her candidacy for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination."
Ellis' argument is centered on the ideas that 1) President Joe Biden, who will be 82 shortly after the 2024 election, is simply too old to run again (Ellis is far from the only person making that case) and 2) The Democratic bench is not terribly strong
He's not the only person eyeing a Clinton re-emergence.
Writing in The Hill newspaper, Democratic pundit Juan Williams makes the case that Clinton should become a major figure on the campaign trail this year.
"Clinton is exactly the right person to put steel in the Democrats' spine and bring attention to the reality that 'ultra-MAGA' Republicans, as President Biden calls them, are tearing apart the nation," Williams writes, adding: "Keep talking and talk louder, Hillary!"
So, just how far-fetched is a Clinton candidacy?
Well, start here: That a conservative writer is leading the charge -- at least at the moment -- for another presidential bid by Clinton should be looked at with some healthy skepticism. No candidate unites the Republican party -- even with Donald Trump as the GOP's likely nominee -- like Clinton does. So, this may be a bit of wishful thinking by Ellis. Keep that in mind.
Then go to this: Biden is giving every indication that, even at his advance age, he is planning to run again. The New York Times posted a piece Monday night headlined "Biden Irked by Democrats Who Won't Take 'Yes' for an Answer on 2024" that included these lines:
"Facing intensifying skepticism about his capacity to run for re-election when he will be nearly 82, the president and his top aides have been stung by the questions about his plans, irritated at what they see as a lack of respect from their party and the press, and determined to tamp down suggestions that he's effectively a lame duck a year and a half into his administration."
And finish here: Clinton has been pretty close to Shermanesque in her denials about even considering another bid.
Excerpted...
In the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court's monumental decision to overturn Roe v Wade, conservative writer John Ellis took to the internet to make a provocative case: It was time for Hillary Clinton to make a(nother) political comeback.
"Now is her moment," he wrote. "The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade creates the opening for Hillary Clinton to get out of stealth mode and start down the path toward declaring her candidacy for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination."
Ellis' argument is centered on the ideas that 1) President Joe Biden, who will be 82 shortly after the 2024 election, is simply too old to run again (Ellis is far from the only person making that case) and 2) The Democratic bench is not terribly strong
He's not the only person eyeing a Clinton re-emergence.
Writing in The Hill newspaper, Democratic pundit Juan Williams makes the case that Clinton should become a major figure on the campaign trail this year.
"Clinton is exactly the right person to put steel in the Democrats' spine and bring attention to the reality that 'ultra-MAGA' Republicans, as President Biden calls them, are tearing apart the nation," Williams writes, adding: "Keep talking and talk louder, Hillary!"
So, just how far-fetched is a Clinton candidacy?
Well, start here: That a conservative writer is leading the charge -- at least at the moment -- for another presidential bid by Clinton should be looked at with some healthy skepticism. No candidate unites the Republican party -- even with Donald Trump as the GOP's likely nominee -- like Clinton does. So, this may be a bit of wishful thinking by Ellis. Keep that in mind.
Then go to this: Biden is giving every indication that, even at his advance age, he is planning to run again. The New York Times posted a piece Monday night headlined "Biden Irked by Democrats Who Won't Take 'Yes' for an Answer on 2024" that included these lines:
"Facing intensifying skepticism about his capacity to run for re-election when he will be nearly 82, the president and his top aides have been stung by the questions about his plans, irritated at what they see as a lack of respect from their party and the press, and determined to tamp down suggestions that he's effectively a lame duck a year and a half into his administration."
And finish here: Clinton has been pretty close to Shermanesque in her denials about even considering another bid.
tytlyf
Not Religious
Clinton isn't running in 2024. This is the same recycled nonsense these conservatives did for the 2020 election.
esmith
Veteran Member
He doesn't want me posting news items about
various people predicting or wanting Hillary to
run in 2024.
I'm not saying it's good, bad, or even likely.
But it's interesting.
tytlyf
Not Religious
I'm pointing out it's the same recycled opinion pieces that happen every presidential election. My predictions have always been right.
There is no merit to her running in 2024.