1nharmony said:
If all people were BORN blind, and none had ever experienced sight, vision would be a completely unknown concept. The other senses would naturally be more highly developed, however, I think that chances are we would NOT be the dominant species on this planet. Our existence would be primarily focused on survival.
Buttons* said:
This is true, so do you think it would help put us into perspective to see ourselves as blind at times?
That's difficult because one must have the experience of being blind in order to have an accurate perspective of it. After 48 years of a sighted existence I can only
imagine a life of blindness. Of course, I could delve into the experience by temporarily removing my sight by artificial means which could at least provide a better perspective. It is still a limited perspective, though, since even when I close my eyes my mind fills with images I am familiar with as a sighted person. I do think that greater empathy in the world would lead to greater peace. Empathy requires placing equal or greater importance on others than upon oneself, and viewing other experiences and perspectives to be equally as valid as our own. Anything that can create empathy is a valuable tool in this war-torn world.
1nharmony said:
If people couldn't see, what would they talk about? Of course, they would talk about what they hear, touch or smell. Our concepts and cultures originate at the base level of sensory input. From there our incredible human brains begin analyzing and storing memories. How different would the evolution of homo sapiens have been without, arguably, the most important of the five senses? Would we still develop the concept of a "god" without the benefit of sight? There's probably a whole new thread/debate in that question.
Buttons* said:
I really like where you're going with this.... What do you think?......i think it's a good point of discussion in this thread. I asked about all aspects of sight. So please, continue! *smiles*
Alright, since you insist. ;-)
I suppose the first thing one must debate is to what extent our sense of sight is incorporated into our concept of God. In my opinion it is an extremely extensive element. It seems to me that visual stimulus is the primary factor in the development of our thoughts and ideas. This is not to say that thoughts and ideas would not occur in the absense of sight, of course, but that the sense of sight overwhelms the others so dominantly that the input from our other four senses is minor in comparison.
The next question has to be whether "god" reveals itself to man in some way (as most religions assert) or has man "created" god out of some deep instinctual need to explain his own surroundings and existence? If one assumes the former, then no further debate is required since we would also assume that, no matter the condition of man, "god" would reveal itself in some way. So to debate the importance of sight as an element in our concept of god, let's assume the latter.
If the concept of god grew out of man's physical existence and experience on this planet, then two questions follow. Would the concept have developed at all in the absence of sight and, if so, how would it differ? Obviously, the most qualified to answer these queries would be the community of blind people in our world. Absent this input, we must depend upon our own imaginations which, as pointed out earlier, is highly tainted by a lifetime of visual images stored in there. But I'll give it a shot. (No pun intended, Mr. Cheney.)
If you could create an identical planet Earth populated by humans without visual abilities (with that being the single, isolated difference in the thousands, millions or billions of years of man's evolution) I think it would be unrecognizable by us today. Obvious differences would be the lack of cars, highways and oil rigs that we depend on for our mobility today. Quite honestly, the differences would be so staggering that I am having a rough time even imaging what life would be like under this condition of sightlessness. So instead, I'm going to focus on the ways my sight influences my concept of the existence of a god.
Today, there is so much printed matter available that one's spiritual path may be diverted in any number of directions during a lifetime. (This is true, at least, here in America; certainly it is less so in other parts of the world.) So reading is one of our visual sources of input. Images are another big influence, however, an association must be created in order for the image to have a religious meaning. A cross can have a very meaningful impact or it can just be the letter "t". It all depends on the association you assign to it. How about "miraculous" healings? Once again, there is a visual event which we find the need to explain. Why assign an explanation such as "it was an answer to prayer" rather than any other equally valid possibility such as "an unknown bio-kinetic immune system response occured, thereby eliminating the disease". It's not so much that we need to know why things are the way they are, but more of a need to explain why things
happen. So without a sense of sight, would we still have a need to explain events that we cannot see? Well, I tend to think yes. Because we would still have human hearts and emotions, we would still care about each other. I think we would still desire to ease the pain and suffering of our fellow man. I think questions would still arise such as "Why did he get sick? ...and... Why was she injured? ...and... Why did the baby have to die?" And so I think we would still develop the need for spiritual salve of some kind to ease our aching hearts. And out of that comes the concept of a Greater Being; hopefully one that has our better well-being at heart.