I don't know. I would check YouTube.
So where are you getting your information on Amun? Youtube? I've found that to be a terriblee soource for information. Especially when it comes to the attempts to sync-up Judaism with Egyptian religions.
Amun is the highest God of the Egyptian's state religion.
This is what I'm looking at.
en.m.wikipedia.org
I haven't read it carefully, but, I don't see "the highest God of the Egyptian's state religion". Do you see that?
I do see a rising to power and a name change to Amun-Ra. That's significantly different than Ahmayhn. Amun, it seems was a "wind" god. Alpeh-Mem-Nun is referring to a faithful king. The root Aleph-Mem-Nun means "faith". Judaism doesn't have a "wind" god. The word for wind or spirit is Ruach, that is Reish-Vav-Chet. It's a totally different word.
Amun-Ra's spouse, Ma'at, I think is the "faithful" god in the egyptian pantheon.
These are the sort of details that get omitted often when "youtubers" masquerade as experts.
Could be any inscription of Amun.
Bring one! Let's look at it!
t's great you said this. Dawg is a great example. What's happening, it seems, is a phonetic similarity is being exaggerated into something significant when it isn't. There's a term for this. It's called "parallelomania".
en.m.wikipedia.org
It should be obvious that phonetic similarities do not always have significance nor confer a relationship between two words. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.
In english is there a relationship between "sun" and "son"? How about the name "Don" and the sun rising at "dawn"? What about "damn" the expletive and a "dam" built by beavers? Is there any corresponence?
You mentioned "dawg" it's one of my favorite examples. Because in hebrew a "dog" ( dawg ) is a fish! Literally. You see, people claim these phonetic correlations a lot, but, they're really silly. They're claiming a dog is a fish! Then when it's shown to them that the two words are actually quite different, they put their fingers in their ears and close their eyes like a crazy person. That's why it's called parallelomania. The individual has a sort of mania.
What you'll find is, the shorter the word, the easier it is to falsely imagine a phonetic correspondance when there isn't one.
Conversely, there could be a correspondence, and it could be that someone like me has paralllelophobia where they will deny ANY parallels. It's the same cognitive fault as the maniac, but it's being applied in reverse as a phobia ( of sorts ).
Make sense?
That's why it's good to look at these correspondences to see if the phonetic similarity *actually* describes a parallel, or, are all the differences being ignored such that a dog is imagined to be a fish?