Sin is everywhere in Science. How to use sin for your purposes?

[questfortruth]

however respected scientists. That respect has been earned through years of work

I respect my papers because they are not debunked yet. God respects my efforts to advance mankind.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody has found my mistakes,
2. I am right, but I am being bullied because I am not famous yet.

If ever I were to label something as "sin," it would be this mentality of "you're either with me or against me." I would argue that extends to "not agreeing with me is sin." Especially when claimed from such certainty where it just cannot be had. Since you submitted it again, it may be possible they threw it in the shredder and are leaving at "under review." It may be they are reviewing it, and it may be right. But I suspect you're not, and it's going the way of rejection.

 

[Clara Tea]

"For there is no acceptance of faces with God" Romans 2:11.

I have submitted the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis to the top journal Math. Immediately I received a rejection letter

Respect must be earned, not demanded.

Math requires proof.

It is not like religion where one could proclaim themselves to be God, and those who follow without requiring proof will follow them.

 

[Clara Tea]

You can't even SPELL science without sin.

Let he who is without sin cast the first (ouch, that hurt).....as I was saying, let he who is without sin cast the first (ouch, that hurt again). Could whomever is throwing stones quit doing it for a moment?

 

[firedragon]

It is not like religion where one could proclaim themselves to be God, and those who follow without requiring proof will follow them.

Can you provide evidence that religion is someone proclaiming himself as God, and those followers only follow without requiring proof?

I presume you understand that saying "no evidence" is not evidence to your claim. I believe as a person who speaks so much about proof should understand that. Thus, I will wait for your thesis.

 

[questfortruth]

Respect must be earned, not demanded.

Please use Holy Bible or Koran to support your strange thesis.

 

[MatthewA]

Hello

Here is what is sin means in the Greek ~ from the bible incase you would like to understand what sin is.
Strong's Greek: 266. ἁμαρτία (hamartia) -- a sin, failure

Strong's Concordance
hamartia: a sin, failure
Original Word: ἁμαρτία, ας, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: hamartia
Phonetic Spelling: (ham-ar-tee'-ah)

Definition: a sin, failure
Usage: prop: missing the mark; hence: (a) guilt, sin, (b) a fault, failure (in an ethical sense), sinful deed.

266 hamartía (a feminine noun derived from 1 /A "not" and 3313 /méros, "a part, share of") – properly, no-share ("no part of"); loss (forfeiture) because not hitting the target; sin (missing the mark).

266 /hamartía ("sin, forfeiture because missing the mark") is the brand of sin that emphasizes its self-originated (self-empowered) nature – i.e. it is not originated or empowered by God (i.e. not of faith, His inworked persuasion, cf. Ro 14:23).

 

[Clara Tea]

Hello

Here is what is sin means in the Greek ~ from the bible incase you would like to understand what sin is.
Strong's Greek: 266. ἁμαρτία (hamartia) -- a sin, failure

Strong's Concordance
hamartia: a sin, failure
Original Word: ἁμαρτία, ας, ἡ
Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine
Transliteration: hamartia
Phonetic Spelling: (ham-ar-tee'-ah)

Definition: a sin, failure
Usage: prop: missing the mark; hence: (a) guilt, sin, (b) a fault, failure (in an ethical sense), sinful deed.

266 hamartía (a feminine noun derived from 1 /A "not" and 3313 /méros, "a part, share of") – properly, no-share ("no part of"); loss (forfeiture) because not hitting the target; sin (missing the mark).

266 /hamartía ("sin, forfeiture because missing the mark") is the brand of sin that emphasizes its self-originated (self-empowered) nature – i.e. it is not originated or empowered by God (i.e. not of faith, His inworked persuasion, cf. Ro 14:23).

Sin means "without" in Spanish. So, he who is without sin is the one who is without without. But, if you run out of something you don't have any. If you run out of "without" you don't have any "without" which means that you have some. So, that must be the basis for the idea of original sin because we all have some.

Now all I have to do is figure out what it is that we are talking about. (without what?)

This is worse than the "who's on first" problem of Abbot and Costello.

Now I can start on the definition of "dime" which means 10 cents in English and "give me" in Spanish. So, dime un dime means give me a dime.

 

[MatthewA]

Sin means "without" in Spanish. So, he who is without sin is the one who is without without. But, if you run out of something you don't have any. If you run out of "without" you don't have any "without" which means that you have some. So, that must be the basis for the idea of original sin because we all have some.

Now all I have to do is figure out what it is that we are talking about. (without what?)

This is worse than the "who's on first" problem of Abbot and Costello.

Hello Clara,

Did look up and seen that according to Google translation sin does mean without according to Google. Thought about doing a further search and found by typing this "spanish word for sin bible translation."

Found this: el pecado en dentro de el la la biblia. (sin in the bible).

Is el pecado the right word for sin here in spanish?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Please use Holy Bible or Koran to support your strange thesis.

And that's probably why you're solution will fail. You can't force fit things to conform to math. It works just fine, swell, and dandy for Christianity and Islam, but math demands proof.
This is how we know the Monty Hall problem is true, no matter how many people and how strongly they object and insist the second choice has 50/50 odds of selecting the winning door, even though that mathematically is not the case.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Hello Clara,

Did look up and seen that according to Google translation sin does mean without according to Google. Thought about doing a further search and found by typing this "spanish word for sin bible translation."

Found this: el pecado en dentro de el la la biblia. (sin in the bible).

Is el pecado the right word for sin here in spanish?

Just pecado, to refer to the word. El is a singular, masculine definite article that simple means "the."

 

[MatthewA]

You are right Shadow Wolf; it would be just pecado. Thank you.

 

[blü 2]

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody has found my mistakes,

First , no sin is involved if no bad faith is involved. It's entirely unsinful to be skeptical until one is satisfied of the correctness of any proposition.

Second, what is your demonstration that the abc conjecture is correct? Do you even know what "coprime" means?

 

[Fallen Prophet]

"For there is no acceptance of faces with God" Romans 2:11.

I have submitted the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis to the top journal Math. Immediately I received a rejection letter. Then I sent the proof of the ABC hypothesis to Math. I have been waiting for an answer for a month, and I am waiting still: their website informs me, that the paper is under review. I am one-third sure that they got interested in my approach and can accept it for publication. Suppose it will happen, and, so I will receive the status and fame of an "absolute genius" on the level of Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Hawking, Poincare, and Perelman. Would they reconsider the paper about Riemann Hypothesis, if I resubmit the same file to them again? Indeed, after the successful publication of the ABC hypothesis, they will seriously read whats or ever I have written [and became rejected]. If they will accept my Riemann Hypothesis after they have rejected it, just because I have proven the ABC conjecture and became famous, it is WRONGDOING.

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody has found my mistakes,
2. I am right, but I am being bullied because I am not famous yet.

1. One scientist is better than another.
2. Thus, there is the best scientist.
3. I have a chance to be the best. I respect my papers because they are not debunked yet. God respects my efforts to advance mankind.

Please use Holy Bible or Koran to support your strange thesis, which is "Respect must be earned, not demanded."

I guess you and I disagree on what constitutes "sin".

 

[Bear Wild]

"For there is no acceptance of faces with God" Romans 2:11.

I have submitted the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis to the top journal Math. Immediately I received a rejection letter. Then I sent the proof of the ABC hypothesis to Math. I have been waiting for an answer for a month, and I am waiting still: their website informs me, that the paper is under review. I am one-third sure that they got interested in my approach and can accept it for publication. Suppose it will happen, and, so I will receive the status and fame of an "absolute genius" on the level of Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Hawking, Poincare, and Perelman. Would they reconsider the paper about Riemann Hypothesis, if I resubmit the same file to them again? Indeed, after the successful publication of the ABC hypothesis, they will seriously read whats or ever I have written [and became rejected]. If they will accept my Riemann Hypothesis after they have rejected it, just because I have proven the ABC conjecture and became famous, it is WRONGDOING.

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody has found my mistakes,
2. I am right, but I am being bullied because I am not famous yet.

1. One scientist is better than another.
2. Thus, there is the best scientist.
3. I have a chance to be the best. I respect my papers because they are not debunked yet. God respects my efforts to advance mankind.

Please use Holy Bible or Koran to support your strange thesis, which is "Respect must be earned, not demanded."

Thank the goddess we have you in this forum to let us know what is sin and what is not. Not agreeing with you is clearly a sin so that is why so many on the forum are sinners. You at least are humble thankfully and open minded. Not.

 

[Bear Wild]

I guess you and I disagree on what constitutes "sin".

No it is simple if you disagree with him you are committing a sin. You see it is quite simple. Simple minded that is.

 

[Fallen Prophet]

No it is simple if you disagree with him you are committing a sin. You see it is quite simple. Simple minded that is.

And sad.

 

[questfortruth]

Thank the goddess we have you in this forum to let us know what is sin and what is not. Not agreeing with you is clearly a sin so that is why so many on the forum are sinners. You at least are humble thankfully and open minded. Not.

First , no sin is involved if no bad faith is involved. It's entirely unsinful to be skeptical until one is satisfied of the correctness of any proposition.

Second, what is your demonstration that the abc conjecture is correct? Do you even know what "coprime" means?

How skepticism correlates with the Presumption of Innocence?

How skepticism correlates with the Presumption of Guilt?

 

[Bear Wild]

How skepticism correlates with the Presumption of Innocence?

How skepticism correlates with the Presumption of Guilt?

Well skepticism and your posts seem to go hand in hand.

 

[blü 2]

How skepticism correlates with the Presumption of Innocence?

Being assumed innocent of someone else's accusation until the contrary is shown is not the same thing as being right regarding your own claims until shown to be wrong.

There is no assumption that your claims are correct. It's up to you to demonstrate their correctness to people with expertise in the field.

And what is your demonstration that your claim is correct anyway? I asked you for that before but you forgot to include it with your answer.