Sin is everywhere in Science. How to use sin for your purposes?

[Dan From Smithville]

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody found my mistakes,
2. I am right, but I am being bullied because I am not famous yet.

Does there have to be mistakes in something for a person not to agree with it? Regardless of mistakes or not or noticing them or not, disagreeing with you does not rise to the level of a sin.

 

[Spirit of Light]

Does there have to be mistakes in something for a person not to agree with it? Regardless of mistakes or not or noticing them or not, disagreeing with you does not rise to the level of a sin.

Only if he see him self as RF God

 

[Dan From Smithville]

1. One scientist is better than another.
2. Thus, there is the best scientist.
3. I have a chance to be the best:
"Simply the best."

In what way are the better? Is a 6'6", 275 lbs scientist better than a 5'10", 180 lbs scientist? What if one is a great southpaw pitcher and the other is not. How are you measuring greatness? Is a scientist that discovers a means to synthesize organs better than one that discovers a means to combat climate change? Would you be comparing scientists or achievements?

 

[joelr]

"For there is no acceptance of faces with God" Romans 2:11.

I have submitted the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis to the top journal Math. Immediately I received a rejection letter. Then I sent the proof of the ABC hypothesis to Math. I have been waiting for an answer for a month, and I am waiting still: their website informs me, that the paper is under review. I am one-third sure that they got interested in my approach and can accept it for publication. Suppose it will happen, and, so I will receive the status and fame of an "absolute genius" on the level of Nikola Tesla, Einstein, Hawking, Poincare, and Perelman. Would they reconsider the paper about Riemann Hypothesis, if I resubmit the same file to them again? Indeed, after the successful publication of the ABC hypothesis, they will seriously read whats or ever I have written [and became rejected]. If they will accept my Riemann Hypothesis after they have rejected it, just because I have proven the ABC conjecture and became famous, it is WRONGDOING.

Not agreeing with me is sin, if:
1. nobody has found my mistakes,
2. I am right, but I am being bullied because I am not famous yet.

1. One scientist is better than another.
2. Thus, there is the best scientist.
3. I have a chance to be the best. I respect my papers because they are not debunked yet. God respects my efforts to advance mankind.

Are the non-trivial zeros all on the critical line or not? What branch of mathematics do you use in your proof?

 

[It Aint Necessarily So]

pecado.

Pecado is from the Latin peccare, to sin. It appears in some English words such as impeccable and peccadillo. The meaning is closest to mistake, not the religious sense of being a violation of God's law. Impeccable taste in clothing means never making a fashion mistake, and a peccadillo is a small mistake not considered serious. A less well known word is peccant, which means guilty of violating a rule, especially a moral violation.

Pecoso means freckled in Spanish, kind of a mistake in pigmentation if you will. I knew a spotted dog with that name.

 

[Irate State]

Sin means "without" in Spanish. So, he who is without sin is the one who is without without. But, if you run out of something you don't have any. If you run out of "without" you don't have any "without" which means that you have some. So, that must be the basis for the idea of original sin because we all have some.

Now all I have to do is figure out what it is that we are talking about. (without what?)

This is worse than the "who's on first" problem of Abbot and Costello.

Now I can start on the definition of "dime" which means 10 cents in English and "give me" in Spanish. So, dime un dime means give me a dime.

Ha! Nice, only that give me in Spanish is dame, as in lady, and dime is tell me.

 

[GardenLady]

Huh. I had a journal article accepted by and published in the Journal of Official Statistics. I am not famous nor considered as brilliant as Einstein or Tesla. Maybe I got cheated?