MNoBody
Well-Known Member
care to elaborateAnd therein lies the rub...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
care to elaborateAnd therein lies the rub...
Common sense?
If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCoV infection. [emphasis added - JS]
Maybe you should be clearer to avoid damaging your credibility.I'm not attached to the word lie, mislead/withhold information/not give the full picture would have the same result of damaging credibility.
I saw official statements saying exactly that (mostly in the UK but internationally too). You've still presented nothing supporting the idea that any official statements were misleading, over secondary reporting or individual understanding of them being flawed.You said "Alternatively, it might have reduced the panic buying of masks, making them unavailable to those who needed them to do their vital jobs". If that is the reason, then say it.
Well first, you've put that in quotes but you've still not identified who actually said it. That statement alone would indeed be incorrect but in wider context may not be. This kind of debate is exactly why the messaging put out to the public has to be simple, even if that involves brushing over technical complications and exceptions. The aim is to encourage the public to behave in the safest manner possible.When you say "there is no evidence masks protect people who are not sick", yet tell people who are caring for sick people to wear masks, doesn't that strike you as a bit odd?
care to elaborate or are enigmatic remarks your style?
And yet we now hear...
It seems to me that the only good reason not to where a mask is that they're in short supply and others need it more.
I saw official statements saying exactly that (mostly in the UK but internationally too). You've still presented nothing supporting the idea that any official statements were misleading, over secondary reporting or individual understanding of them being flawed.
Well first, you've put that in quotes but you've still not identified who actually said it.
The main reason medical staff wear surgical masks (the basic cloth ones) is to protect their patients they will be getting very close to from them and, alongside gloves and eye-wear, to protect from "splash" contamination when performing any kind of invasive procedure. It's an entirely different circumstance from the average person going to the supermarket under social distancing measures.
of course they do, which is why there are millions made and used every year by professional tradespeople....but they have always been incredibly expensive, since they are a "consumable", not intended for re-used.....and the ones worth having on site are pricey, the cheap ones fail or are ineffective in some way.....Masks do indeed provide some form of protection.
Happy Birthday!No, Korea did an amazing job in halting transmission by large scale testing, contact tracing and isolating.
Standard surgical masks are designed to provide a barrier to splashes and droplets contacting the nose, mouth and respiratory tract, they are not designed to prevent the inhalation of small airborne particles in aerosol generating situations; such as sneezing, coughing and secondary aerosolisation from sufaces (studies on SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 show that the virus persists on surfaces)
Face masks to be effective must tightly fit the user’s face, such as the N95 which must be used with eye protection. Aerosol virus can also enter the eyes infecting patients and are transmitted by touching infected surfaces.
To date there have not been any studies in the effectiveness standard surgical masks or home made masks in decreasing or preventing the transmission of coronaviruses in the general population.
One member said that any who would wear a mask ate idiots.Also interesting why so many (esp. Americans) on RF believe WHO and Government blindly,
that they even called others stupid and calling it nonsense, if they questioned certain things.
I cycle ten miles each day to keep my lungs clear, they bung up if I don't, and I want to get me dose of covid when I feel great.That "you" wasn't meant personal but for all, just as the question wasn't meant as a personal question.
German lawmakers are discussing to make them obligatory.
"I'm not old. I just feel decepid, & have had a few too many birthdays." - Revoltingest
I'm generally of good physical health, walk barefoot 24/7/365 and it was the first flu in my life. Had fever and muscle pain for a few days.
I think I could get it but I'm everything but a social hub, so it's not really worth it.
What the hell are you talking about? My (provisional) assumption is, in fact, that both are true.What about both of them being fine?And yet we now hear...
It seems to me that the only good reason not to where a mask is that they're in short supply and others need it more.
Why one or the other (de ja vu)?
Not every comment needs to have its rival, you know.
What the hell are you talking about? My (provisional) assumption is, in fact, that both are true.
The fact is that the WHO guidance is directed to the healthy, but you can't presume that you are healthy simply by how you feel. (reference #1) Furthermore, it now appears that COVID-19 can spread with greater ease than previously thought (reference #2) These presumed 'facts'. taken together, suggest that the WHO needs to re-evaluate their position.
My wife looks quite enticing in a mask! In lingerie!What I can't help thinking is that fundamentalist muslim women must be thinking the joke's on the rest of us, now.
Yes, women with good eyes can look quite alluring, it must be said.My wife looks quite enticing in a mask! In lingerie!
Ummmm..... errrrr..... too much info.
I do like simple, it is true.Alternatively, it might have reduced the panic buying of masks, making them unavailable to those who needed them to do their vital jobs and preventing those who failed to source any (which would be disproportionately the poor, old and vulnerable) unwilling to leave their home at all, even for important reasons like getting food or medical treatment. None of this is as simple as you'd like to imagine.
We are waiting for WHO reports here.I was reading more more details on
Interim Guidance for the Use of Masks to Control Seasonal Influenza Virus Transmission | CDC. It's for the flu, but I haven't heard yet whether there are other ways to catch the virus that doesn't mirror other similar virus protection protocol.
You put that so brilliantly.Asians often wear 'pollution masks', so masks are more common in general and there is less resistance to wearing them. If it helps with pollution then of course it helps with virus kind of thing.
Westerners have to get over the the fact that they feel like a bit of a wanker wearing one in public, and this is compounded by people saying 'you don't need to wear a mask unless you are ill'.
Obviously, however, a mask helps prevent spread and the 'no mask' brigade are, at best, criminally negligent.
of course they do, which is why there are millions made and used every year by professional tradespeople....but they have always been incredibly expensive, since they are a "consumable", not intended for re-used.....and the ones worth having on site are pricey, the cheap ones fail or are ineffective in some way.....