Mycroft
Ministry of Serendipity
Maybe with teens, but adults tend to use drugs without any thought of it making them cool. And, of course, many use them out of enjoyment.
In adults it's an unhealthy dependency.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe with teens, but adults tend to use drugs without any thought of it making them cool. And, of course, many use them out of enjoyment.
That's like saying drinking is an unhealthy dependency. Just because you drink abit every once in awhile does not mean you have a dependency. Marijuana can be used as an escape, and it can be abused, but so can World of Warcraft.In adults it's an unhealthy dependency.
That's like saying drinking is an unhealthy dependency. Just because you drink abit every once in awhile does not mean you have a dependency. Marijuana can be used as an escape, and it can be abused, but so can World of Warcraft.
There are no grounds to assume someone who uses marijuana has a dependency.
Depression was one of my symptoms as well.
I imagine the biggest aspect of it is escapism, the need for which is something that I don't think people can be "cured" from, in my opinion.I wish I understood why people think so. If anything, I feel the opposite. People are far too self-indulgent and have way too many avenues open to be that way.
I imagine the biggest aspect of it is escapism, the need for which is something that I don't think people can be "cured" from, in my opinion.
In all honesty, I do believe the need for escapism can become minimized, but I think it would depend on so many radical personal/social/politcal/economic changes that it's probably never going to happen.I am sorry to hear that. I very much believe that curing people from escapism is very much possible and a high priority. If not from escapism proper, at least from relying on it as a matter of course.
Is this a real thread? If we are going to keep pot illegal, shouldn't there be an even larger push to criminalize alcohol?
The point is that attempts to legislate morality almost always end badly.Sure. Count me in. I am very much wary of alcohol.
However, laws are hardly as effective as consumer refusal. Boycotts and bad publicity, mainly.
Is this a real thread? If we are going to keep pot illegal, shouldn't there be an even larger push to criminalize alcohol? That way, once it's illegal, no one will use it. We'll call it "Prohibition". There will be no booze, no criminal activity will commence, which of course would end up leading to the formation of a well funded and organized crime syndicate, and everyone will sing happy songs. What, it's been done?
Illegal pot kills people all the time. Look at Mexico. Your desire to say "Pot bad. Pot bad!" ends with dead bodies daily. If it were legal, there would be no money in it for criminals, and we could stop reading stories about 10 people being found in a dumpster with their heads cut off because the druggies wanted to make sure they got the right guy.
As long as we have a society where some people are going to be marginalized, and a substance makes them feel better while they are trapped, you'll have a drug problem. Wanna get rid of drugs? Get socialized health care and free university educations. If people have hope they have no need to escape.
Which is yet another reason not to rely on law - and that encompasses legalization just as much as it does prohibition.The point is that attempts to legislate morality almost always end badly.
The violence caused by those drug cartels is truly shocking. I'd love for them all to be put out of business overnight.
There's a difference between legalization and decriminalization, for starters. I favor the latter. How can you look at how alcohol is treated in the US and conclude that legalization is a rubber stamp approval? Did you watch any of the videos I shared above? There are growers who are genetically modifying pot for the medically beneficial component specifically for use medicinally. These strands have very little, if any, THC, the component which gets you high. So yes, there is a strong liklihood that pot will come to be seen as medically acceptable.Which is yet another reason not to rely on law - and that encompasses legalization just as much as it does prohibition.
Arguably more so, even, since legalization is at the end of the day so often (mis)perceived as a statement that the substance is medically and morally acceptable to use.
To do that though, you're going to have to get Humans to deny their desires for escapism via drugs.Deny them a market and they will crumble.
There's a difference between legalization and decriminalization, for starters. I favor the latter. How can you look at how alcohol is treated in the US and conclude that legalization is a rubber stamp approval?
Did you watch any of the videos I shared above? There are growers who are genetically modifying pot for the medically beneficial component specifically for use medicinally. These strands have very little, if any, THC, the component which gets you high. So yes, there is a strong liklihood that pot will come to be seen as medically acceptable.
ETA: Additionally, one of the biggest problems with today's pot is the level of THC in modern strands has been bred up significantly from what it was. Legalization offers the opportunity to control this by regulation.
To do that though, you're going to have to get Humans to deny their desires for escapism via drugs.
Legalization has potential to collapse the cartels too, and to be honest I think that outcome is more probable.
Exactly!
It did not work for tobacco, nor for alcohol. Why would it be any different for hemp?