• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Socialist Netflix propaganda at it's 'Best'.

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
So 99% of the "new, fresh faced lawmakers" are anti-social?

What have you got against co-operation and family values? Didn't you post a diatribe against Right-wing values just a week nor so ago?

What the heck is a "socialist takeover?" Who are these "socialists," and what is their nefarious agenda?
Were the New deal and Great Society bad things? Are fairness, equality and general prosperity bad things?

You are a royalist.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I see the Ministry of "Truth" (10,000 lies) of Emperor Despicable Donald has told his true believers to use the word "socialist" whenever possible.

1*ugDyMOoJIgzGnFAt6c6i_Q.jpeg


obama-victory-republicans-socialism-thanksgiving-ecards-someecards.png
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
Opinion | The AOC documentary "Knock Down The House" caught lightning in a bottle

So busy prepping the socialist Democrats media darling , and their goal for a socialist takeover.


Ocasio-Cortez Has Turned Corporate Media Into an Agent of Socialist Change

What a pile of bull****. What's next? A mandatory parade trotting her likness down Red... I mean Times square?

Everything to you, indicates socialism.

From paper bags to paper straws...

It's pretty irrational, one could describe.
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Everything to you, indicates socialism.

From paper bags to paper straws...

It's pretty irrational, one might describe.
Hardly. It's a clear and direct symptom of a serious threat to this country. Namely socialist Democrats in their attempts to pave the way to a deep state infrastructure.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Hardly. It's a clear and direct symptom of a serious threat to this country. Namely socialist Democrats in their attempts to pave the way to a deep state infrastructure.
OMG, it’s infrastructure week again at the White House! Trump is a socialist!
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
Ocasio-Cortez Has Turned Corporate Media Into an Agent of Socialist Change
I’d suggest it’s the other way around. As much as the media is being used by her to promote her policies, she is being used by the media to make money in the full knowledge that she isn’t going to be able to actually change anything. I thought you’d be supportive or that brand of raw capitalism. :cool:

What's next? A mandatory parade trotting her likness down Red... I mean Times square?
Where did the mandatory come from? I’m sure there are plenty of fawning articles and documentaries about different politicians but we’re not forced to watch or agree with any of them. Indeed, much or the time I’m sure the media would want and encourage negative responses since they’ll tend to get them more attention.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
I see the Ministry of "Truth" (10,000 lies) of Emperor Despicable Donald has told his true believers to use the word "socialist" whenever possible.

1*ugDyMOoJIgzGnFAt6c6i_Q.jpeg


obama-victory-republicans-socialism-thanksgiving-ecards-someecards.png

Since my extended family come from Venezuela... let me translate this into reality... and remove the words Democrat and Republican..

It isn't sharing and caring, it is robbing an uncaring...

It isn't sharing your Thanksgiving, it is standing in long lines to get whatever is on the government menu and empty shelves.

The majority of Democrats do care as do the majority of Republicans but Socialism is not the answer.
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
Hardly. It's a clear and direct symptom of a serious threat to this country. Namely socialist Democrats in their attempts to pave the way to a deep state infrastructure.

Didn't I prove to you that the same policies of controlling bags were adopted by conservative counties and states?

All you see are red and blue. Could you be considered an extremist given all this exaggerated rhetoric?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
The majority of Democrats do care as do the majority of Republicans but Socialism is not the answer.
But by that standard, neither is capitalism. Besides corruption and over-investment, it was the large drop in international oil prices that created much of this economic catastrophe.
 

Yerda

Veteran Member

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
But by that standard, neither is capitalism. Besides corruption and over-investment, it was the large drop in international oil prices that created much of this economic catastrophe.
Yes, capitalism without love is not correct. Thus, capitalists should have philanthropic efforts. But socialism doesn't really accomplish that love.

Take Bernie Sanders, for an example, as the reason why it doesn't work:

"Senators Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker gave more than 2 percent of their total incomes, according to their returns."

How Much Money Democratic 2020 Candidates Gave to Charity in 2018

Hypocrisy defined by Merriam-Webster :

: a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not : behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel

So, here we have a socialists claiming to want to help the need and give more opportunity to those with less and gives between 2% to 3% of his income.

If you look at those who have much, preaching how unfair things are and how the masses need more help, will always follow the position of not giving towards what they believe. In the end, they will still have (as the leaders) and everyone else will still be in the "have not" category.

Cases: "Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea". Countries that begin to go to capitalism always improve the overall status of its citizens.

The reason why this surfaces, is because they preach that they want to help the needy and the needy do need help but the hypocrisy of what they are preaching is that they really don't live or do what they say and thus, when in power, the needy remain needy.

On the other extreme, capitalism without love, can also give the same results. The rich who have no skin in helping the poor. We see corporations that have done just that.

IMV, it is capitalism without love that gives place for the thought of socialism/communism. But both are extremes. Thus Jesus wanted the rich to help the poor (and not ROB, RANSACK AND FORCIBLY TAKE FROM THE RICH AND GIVE IT TO THE POOR).

the Apostle Paul understood this:

1 Tim 6:17 Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; 18 That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate; 19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.

Notice, it says for those who have the capacity to create wealth to have love and give. But he didn't say "forcibly take away".
 
Top