Solution to Cosmology Crisis: Flat Universe with dome

[Spirit of Light]

In my idea all galaxies run away from our own Galaxy, hereby there is no expansion of Universe spacetime.

But the galaxy you call ours, are also moving away from the middle of the universe (Big Bang point)
Why do you think everything goes out from this galaxy?

 

[ChristineM]

But the galaxy you call ours, are also moving away from the middle of the universe (Big Bang point)
Why do you think everything goes out from this galaxy?

There is no middle, (in general) everything is moving away from everything else. The big bang point is everywhere

 

[Milton Platt]

The humans are different from Nature: trees, dogs, stones are not going to the Church nor visiting an art gallery.

Humans are substantively the same as all other animals.

 

[Spirit of Light]

There is no middle, (in general) everything is moving away from everything else. The big bang point is everywhere

Yes, you are correct

 

[questfortruth]

Humans are substantively the same as all other animals.

If a fly and a Steven Hawking are in life danger, and you can save only one, what is your choice? Why Steven? Fly is useful as well: to clean the dirt in nature.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

It is my science, thus, it is not published. The dome is not half-dome, but spherical like a ball. The Universe is inside. The Earth is the globe, not flat.

You keep using that word: 'science'. It does not mean what you seem to believe it means.

There's a reason why it is not published. The exact same reason why you never see Horoscopes published in the science magazine Nature.

The exact same reason why you don't see Alien Abductions published in Scientific American (except possibly as a social/mental phenomena).

Have you tried getting it published in the magazine Abnormal Psychology?

 

[Milton Platt]

INTRODUCTION:

Author of the ideas: Dmitri Martila, ask him to publish it with your help: [email protected]

Google: "Flat Earth in Bible", "Cosmology Crisis", "Crisis in Cosmology".

Conclusion: Big Bang and expansion of spacetime are not functioning theories.

MY MODEL.

The Universe is flat Pseudo-Euclidean, Minkowski ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2+dy^2+dz^2.
Such one satisfies the Einstein Equations of Gravity if to include Dark Matter (K) and Dark Energy (E) as the non-detectable mathematical modifications of simple type: G+K+E=8\pi T.

The Microwave Background Radiation is not caused by Big Bang, but the quantum effect of the edge of the Universe. The ultra-high energy particle flux is coming from Quantum Effect at the beginning and the end of the Universe: Alpha and Omega t=const surfaces. This quantum effect is calculated in an analogy of Black Hole evaporation: Hawking Radiation.

The red-shift of galaxies is caused by the Doppler effect of galaxy run away from Earth velocity, not by the expansion of space. Consequence: Universe in this model is not isotropic and not homogeneous. However the result of homogeneous Universe is not the fact of observation, but of the globally accepted Big Bang model. I have a different model, the model, which contradicts the Theory of Darwin. Why? Because Darwinism trolls the human as being like non-important "star dust", aliens genetic failure, or monkey, which, thus, can not have a special place in the cosmos. In my model, the Universe has the center: our Galaxy.

Are you still on about this crap? Darwin has nothing to do with cosmology, an you need to present your "theory" to an appropriate authority, not an online forum.

 

[Twilight Hue]

If a fly and a Steven Hawking are in life danger, and you can save only one, what is your choice? Why Steven? Fly is useful as well: to clean the dirt in nature.

I'm suddenly thinking of Jeff Goldblum.

 

[Milton Platt]

If a fly and a Steven Hawking are in life danger, and you can save only one, what is your choice? Why Steven? Fly is useful as well: to clean the dirt in nature.

I said substantively. Meaning that humans are made of the same substance.
You are referring to a human construct of relative worth.

 

[questfortruth]

Darwin has nothing to do with cosmology, and you need to present your "theory" to an appropriate authority, not an online forum.

It is the Fallacy of Authority - demand to be published in an authority journal to be taken seriously.
Darwin (namely his followers) tells us, that the place of the human is not special at all: there must be different civilizations on other planets. In my model, the Milky Way is the unique center of all Reality.

 

[Subduction Zone]

All nonsense, shows ignorance of basic astrophysics.

Next.

But it sounds so sciencey.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There is no middle, (in general) everything is moving away from everything else. The big bang point is everywhere

That is only because I am the center of the universe.

 

[ChristineM]

That is only because I am the center of the universe.

And why everyone heads away from you at a rapid rate of knots ;-)

But watch out for Andromeda, seems friendly enough but in time will become all together too friendly?

 

[questfortruth]

But it sounds so sciencey.

It is the Fallacy of Authority - demand to be published in an authority journal to be taken seriously.

 

[questfortruth]

And why everyone heads away from you at a rapid rate of knots ;-)

But watch out for Andromeda, seems friendly enough but in time will become all together too friendly?

The Hubble law in my model shows, that 28 billion (virtual) years ago all galaxies were in one single point. Perhaps the different speed law would cause, that runaway would not be started from one single point, and all the galaxies were be colliding.

 

[Milton Platt]

It is the Fallacy of Authority - demand to be published in an authority journal to be taken seriously.
Darwin (namely his followers) tells us, that the place of the human is not special at all: there must be different civilizations on other planets. In my model, the Milky Way is the unique center of all Reality.

You seem to understand logical fallacies about as well as you understand cosmology and the scientific method. Which is to say, you don’t.

 

[questfortruth]

You are referring to a human construct of relative worth.

Fly is better than Hawking or not? From your philosophy.

 

[questfortruth]

You seem to understand logical fallacies about as well as you understand cosmology and the scientific method. Which is to say, you don’t.

Explain then why publishing in journals is not Fallacy of Authority. It is the fallacy, but one needs money and grants.

 

[questfortruth]

You seem to understand logical fallacies about as well as you understand cosmology and the scientific method. Which is to say, you don’t.

Explain then why publishing in journals is not Fallacy of Authority. It is the fallacy, but one needs money and grants. The rejection from a journal means nowadays nothing in relation to the correctness of the paper: the journal does not find the mistakes in the submissions. They simply troll me, saying: "we don't want it. Period." In the time of Einstein, the journals were in finding the truth, in finding the mistakes in the submissions.

 

[ChristineM]

The Hubble law in my model shows, that 28 billion (virtual) years ago all galaxies were in one single point. Perhaps the different speed law would cause, that runaway would not be started from one single point, and all the galaxies were be colliding.

Play nice